Are youtube money hungry bastards ?
Well if YT is something that you visit a lot is it really all that much
^^^This^^^ It is ironically amazing, in a pathetic sort of way, how some, who clearly are NOT destitute, living on the streets and rummaging through trash bins for half-eaten sandwiches, or sleeping under bridges to get out of the weather, using cardboard boxes for a blanket, whine, cry and complain that they can't have something for free - as though they are
entitled to it - at others expense. And then when they don't get their free hand-outs, they accuse the others of being greedy, money-hungry bastards. Really sad.
Nobody, including me, likes to pay for something I previously enjoyed for free. But I accept someone must pay to produce this product or service and make it available. No one can do that for free, forever without having some sort of revenue stream to support that "charity".
I would argue once you reach monopoly status you should be required to offer affordable options for youtube premium based on disabilities, incomes, etc.
Required? Really? If you owned a business that you run to support your family, would you really want
your government to
force you to provide discounted services to others? Do you want your government all up in your business making sure you are giving what they consider to be your fair share?
Are you going to pay, out of your own profits (if you have any left), to research and verify all those people claiming to be in need, really are in need? Are you going to pay, out of your profits, to verify people claiming to have a disability really are disabled? Do you expect taxpayers (of which you are one) to pick up the tab and compensate and other business owners? Or do you expect your government to force your neighbors and other citizens who have some money to just donate their money to compensate you after you are forced to give away free your product or services to those sticking their hands out?
I am NOT insensitive to those in need, or to the disabled. I spent 24 years in the military. I have close friends with disabilities. Some truly need, and deserve all the help, financially and otherwise, they can get. Poverty is a real problem, and deep rut some cannot escape from - not from lack of trying or through no fault of their own. I get that. The rich, indeed, need to give their
fair share. Loopholes in our tax systems need to be closed.
But the rich (individuals and companies) should not be forced by the government to become charities.
YouTube is not an "essential service" - like a power or water company that is the only provider in the area. While I would certainly argue that YouTube has monopolistic tendencies, it is not a monopoly as there are plenty of
YouTube alternatives.
Having said all that, YouTube does offer an affordable option for everyone - we just have to put up with ads, just like we do with free TV and freeware and so much more.