It's simple to understand:
1. When a person gives someone attitude and guff, it can't be a surprise when they send it right back in kind.
2. One should be willing and able to go fact check oneself, by oneself.
3. When someone lies and claims they didn't say something that they are clearly quoted saying and then tries to blame-shift, there's clearly a problem.
1. Erm..when did I show any attitude whatsoever? I just re-read what I typed earlier and sure enough I can't find anything other than me saying 'but no prices are increasing are you confusing with 5080?'
2. It's entirely normal when someone asks 'oh where did you hear that, what was said because official slides say otherwise'. And it is up to the person claiming whatever it is it to back up his statement. Pretty normal I suppose.
3. What did I even lie about and what's this blame-shift and bla bla? Not sure what you're on about because I did none of that.
Seriously all I said is prices are increasing so can you clarify what you meant. You said it's something Jensen said and I asked what he said, That's literally all that happened in this exchange of ours.
edit: Just thinking this over my head because your responses are super confusing. This scenario is something like this.
My claim: "New AMD X3D CPU's aren't getting a price hike"
Someone points out: "the AMD slides say otherwise what do you even mean?"
Now the proper response would be "see x video, Lisa su states at 24:00 that prices will stay the same" instead of "Go find it, it's not my responsibility". Well, it is. Even if it's not my 'responsibility', it's common courtesy to back up my original statement with what i based it on.