AMD MI300X Accelerators are Competitive with NVIDIA H100, Crunch MLPerf Inference v4.1
The MLCommons consortium on Wednesday posted MLPerf Inference v4.1 benchmark results for popular AI inferencing accelerators available in the market, across brands that include NVIDIA, AMD, and Intel. AMD's Instinct MI300X accelerators emerged competitive to NVIDIA's "Hopper" H100 series AI GPUs. AMD also used the opportunity to showcase the kind of AI inferencing performance uplifts customers can expect from its next-generation EPYC "Turin" server processors powering these MI300X machines. "Turin" features "Zen 5" CPU cores, sporting a 512-bit FPU datapath, and improved performance in AI-relevant 512-bit SIMD instruction-sets, such as AVX-512, and VNNI. The MI300X, on the other hand, banks on the strengths of its memory sub-system, FP8 data format support, and efficient KV cache management.
The MLPerf Inference v4.1 benchmark focused on the 70 billion-parameter LLaMA2-70B model. AMD's submissions included machines featuring the Instinct MI300X, powered by the current EPYC "Genoa" (Zen 4), and next-gen EPYC "Turin" (Zen 5). The GPUs are backed by AMD's ROCm open-source software stack. The benchmark evaluated inference performance using 24,576 Q&A samples from the OpenORCA dataset, with each sample containing up to 1024 input and output tokens. Two scenarios were assessed: the offline scenario, focusing on batch processing to maximize throughput in tokens per second, and the server scenario, which simulates real-time queries with strict latency limits (TTFT ≤ 2 seconds, TPOT ≤ 200 ms). This lets you see the chip's mettle in both high-throughput and low-latency queries.
The MLPerf Inference v4.1 benchmark focused on the 70 billion-parameter LLaMA2-70B model. AMD's submissions included machines featuring the Instinct MI300X, powered by the current EPYC "Genoa" (Zen 4), and next-gen EPYC "Turin" (Zen 5). The GPUs are backed by AMD's ROCm open-source software stack. The benchmark evaluated inference performance using 24,576 Q&A samples from the OpenORCA dataset, with each sample containing up to 1024 input and output tokens. Two scenarios were assessed: the offline scenario, focusing on batch processing to maximize throughput in tokens per second, and the server scenario, which simulates real-time queries with strict latency limits (TTFT ≤ 2 seconds, TPOT ≤ 200 ms). This lets you see the chip's mettle in both high-throughput and low-latency queries.