In late May, NVIDIA launched their GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB. The RTX 4060 Ti and RX 7600 samples from ASUS arrived only after launch, on Friday, and I had to leave for Computex, Taiwan on Sunday. Now that I'm back from Computex I'm tackling those remaining reviews head-on, I've actually got a few more in the pipeline, from ASUS, Galax and Colorful. The GeForce RTX 4060 family consists of several models. Besides the $400 RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB, there will be a 16 GB version ($500) and the RTX 4060 non-Ti 8 GB ($300), which both launch in July.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is based on the NVIDIA AD106 graphics processor, which also powers several laptop GPU models—for desktop it's the first release. RTX 4070 non-Ti and RTX 4070 Ti are both based on AD104. As expected, RTX 4060 uses the NVIDIA Ada architecture, which not only brings improvements to efficiency and ray tracing, it also comes with the DLSS 3 Frame Generation feature, which is a game changer, especially in the lower-end segments, where reaching decent FPS matters more than anything else.

The ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Ti TUF is a factory overclocked custom-design variant with a large triple-slot, triple-fan cooling solution. The factory OC is rated for 2625 MHz, or +90 MHz, which is medium-sized and a bit lower than the OC on the MSI Gaming X Trio (+135 MHz), but at the end of the day there is not a lot of difference between these cards, and the gains over the NVIDIA reference design are small, too. In our testing, on average at 1080p, we found the ASUS TUF just 1% ahead of the NVIDIA 4060 Ti Founders Edition. Averaged over the 25 games in our test suite, at 1080p resolution, the RTX 4060 Ti is able to match last-generation's RTX 3070 and the older RTX 2080 Ti. The gen-over-gen performance improvement of the ASUS RTX 4060 Ti TUF is only 14%, which is much less than what we've seen on the higher-end GeForce 40 cards. Compared to AMD's offerings, the RTX 4060 Ti can beat the RX 6700 XT by 10%, even though that card has 12 GB VRAM. The Radeon RX 6600 XT, Red Team's "x60" offering, is even 38% behind. AMD's new Radeon RX 7600, which also launched last month, is 20% slower than the RTX 4060 Ti—definitely not in the same league. With these performance numbers, the RTX 4060 Ti can easily reach over 60 FPS in all but the most demanding games at 1080p with maximized settings. Actually, the RTX 4060 Ti will capably run many games at 1440p, too, especially if you're willing to lower a few settings here and there.

As expected, ray tracing performance of RTX 4060 Ti is clearly better than its AMD counterparts. With RT enabled, the RTX 4060 Ti matches the Radeon RX 6800 XT, which is positioned roughly two tiers above it. AMD's Radeon RX 6700 XT is a whopping 30% slower. Still, I'm not sure if ray tracing really matters in this segment. The technology comes with a big performance hit that I find difficult to justify, especially when you're already fighting to stay above 60 FPS in heated battles.

Probably the most important selling point for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Generation. The algorithm takes two frames, measures how things have moved in those two frames and calculates an intermediate frame in which these things moved only half the distance. While this approach is definitely not problem-free, especially when pixel-peeping at stills or slowed down video, in real-time it's nearly impossible to notice any difference. As you run at higher FPS and resolution it becomes even more difficult, because the deltas between each frame are getting smaller and smaller. Being able to double your FPS is a huge capability, because it means you can enable ray tracing for free, or game at higher resolutions. Of course you are limited to games with DLSS 3 support, of which there are currently around 40, mostly AAA titles, but not every title will support it. AMD doesn't have anything similar, they announced that FSR 3 exists last year and since then we haven't seen a single demo, with no updates at Computex either.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with a 8 GB VRAM buffer—same as last generation's RTX 3060 Ti. There have been heated discussions claiming that 8 GB is already "obsolete," I've even seen people say that about 12 GB. While it would be nice of course to have more VRAM on the RTX 4060 Ti, for the vast majority of games, especially at resolutions like 1080p, having more VRAM will make exactly zero difference. In our test suite not a single game shows any performance penalty for RTX 4060 Ti vs cards with more VRAM (at 1080p). New games like Resident Evil, Hogwarts Legacy, The Last of Us and Jedi Survivor do allocate a lot of VRAM, which doesn't mean all that data actually gets used. No doubt, you can find edge cases where 8 GB will not be enough, but for thousands of games it will be a complete non-issue, and I think it's not unreasonable for buyers in this price-sensitive segment to to set textures to High instead of Ultra, for two or three titles. If you still want more memory, then NVIDIA has you covered. The RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB launches in July and gives people a chance to put their money where their mouth is. I'm definitely looking forward to testing the 16 GB version, but I doubt the performance differences can justify spending an extra $100.

The ASUS TUF RTX 4060 Ti cooler is a serious looking heatsink that comes with an all-metal construction that definitely helps with the look and feel, and perceived product quality. I like how ASUS separated the fan assembly from the rest of the cooler, which makes it easy to clean the fans, or replace them should they wear out after a few years. Noise levels of the TUF are fantastic, just 28 dBA is almost whisper-quiet, and temperatures are super impressive too, with only 58°C. While the MSI Gaming X Trio runs at considerably lower dBA of just 23, the subjective differences are small—unless you're running a super silent build it'll be very hard to notice subjective difference between either of those models. Just like on their other cards, ASUS is including a dual BIOS feature with the RTX 4060 Ti TUF, which enables a "Quiet" BIOS setting. While the quiet BIOS is definitely a little bit quieter, right now the fan curves are pretty similar, which results in only minor differences—I believe that dual BIOS should provide meaningful choices. Temperatures are super low on either BIOS: 61°C vs 58°C. How about tuning the fan profile to 65°C or even 68°C ? That would result in an amazing low-noise experience that should be able to challenge the MSI Gaming X noise levels. Our apples-to-apples cooler comparison test reveals that the cooler on the ASUS TUF is much more powerful than the one on the NVIDIA FE, by 5°C at same heat output and noise levels. This makes it the second best 4060 Ti cooler tested so far, just 3°C behind the MSI Gaming X Trio. Just like all other recent graphics card releases, the RTX 4060 Ti TUF will stop its fans in idle, desktop work, internet browsing and light gaming.

NVIDIA made big improvements to energy efficiency with their previous GeForce 40 cards, and the RTX 4060 Ti is no exception. With just 160 W, the power supply requirements are minimal, any beige OEM PSU will be able to drive the RTX 4060 Ti just fine, so upgraders can just plop in a new graphics card and they're good to go. Performance per Watt is among the best we've ever seen, similar to RTX 4070, slightly better than RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon RX 7900 XTX; only the RTX 4090 and RTX 4080 are even more energy-efficient. While ASUS runs at the same 160 W default power limit as other cards, their manual adjustment range is the biggest one so far, up to 200 W.

The ASUS RTX 4060 Ti TUF is currently listed for $460, which is a pretty hefty $60 increase on top of the already extremely high MSRP of the RTX 4060 Ti. At that price point I find it impossible to recommend the card, considering that RTX 3080 is just another $40 away. $470 will buy you a Radeon RX 6800 non-XT with 16 GB. NVIDIA's 16 GB version of the RTX 4060 Ti is expected to go on sale for $500, dangerously close to this $470 price point, too. No doubt, you're getting an excellent cooler with the TUF, paired with great fan settings, a dual BIOS and a large power limit adjustment range. Still, I wouldn't be willing to spend more than $30 for that—the other cards are also quiet, and run cool enough. This high GPU pricing will drive more gamers away from the PC platform, to the various game consoles that are similarly priced and will give you a perfectly crafted first-class experience that works on your 4K TV, without any issues like shader compilation and other QA troubles. For GeForce 40 series cards, NVIDIA's force multiplier is DLSS 3, which offers a tremendous performance benefit in supported games. Features like AV1 video encode/decode and (lack of) DisplayPort 2.0 seem irrelevant in this segment, at least in my opinion. Strong competition comes from the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, which sells for $320, with only slightly less performance. That card has a 12 GB framebuffer, but lacks DLSS 3 and has weaker ray tracing performance. I don't think I'd buy a $400 RTX 3070, or a $320 RTX 3060 Ti—I'd rather have DLSS 3. If you can live with quite a bit less performance, but a more attractive price point of $270, then the Radeon RX 7600 could be an option. If you can find a great deal on a used card, maybe consider that.