Watercool Heatkiller Rad 360-S Review 5

Watercool Heatkiller Rad 360-S Review

Performance Summary & Performance per Dollar »

Thermal Performance

Everything needed—monitor, peripherals, motherboard w/CPU and GPU, radiator, PSU, and so forth—is placed in a sealed, climate-controlled box at 25°C +/- 0.05 °C. Each radiator is connected by Koolance QD3 quick disconnects for easier changing of the fans and radiator. The flow rate is held at 1 GPM constant flow rate. The CPU, an Intel Core i7-4770K at 4.6 GHz and 1.3 V, is held at a constant load using a custom Intel XTU profile, and the GPU, an EVGA GTX 780 Ti Classified under load from Unigine Heaven 4.0 at 1080p with extreme HD settings, is overclocked and overvolted in such a way that the total system power draw is 550 W as measured by a power meter.

A near-constant heat load into the liquid loop by the addition of the CPU and GPU helps quickly achieve stable liquid-loop temperatures as measured by three separate in-line temperature sensors hooked up to an Aquacomputer Aquaero 6 XT. The tubing and fittings are insulated by a sleeve heater, but its heat function is not utilized. Every single measurement is done twice as a means of verification. Any possibility of running a fan outside of its static maximum RPM is minimized by as much as possible by using a comprehensive series of separate fans (Noiseblocker eLoop, B12-1 through B12-4) to cover a broad RPM range while minimizing fan speed variance and, thus, airflow. The results below are the ∆T (coolant temperature - ambient temperature) in degrees Celsius.


Keep in mind that the current test database does not include many other radiators, with most radiators I have tested before being 480 or 560 mm. I have also gone ahead and removed the 2200 RPM results because the trend is clearly against much higher speed fans, especially as there are now better performance/noise fans than the NB-eLoops used here. Watercool says it was targeting the new radiators for good low-to-medium speed performance, and perhaps the lower end was potentially hampered by the louvered fins here. This hurts the Heatkiller Rad 360-S more than its thicker brethren, which scales better with airflow at the medium fan speeds. Unfortunately, the core geometry of the Heatkiller 360-S never gets a chance to do so here, which is also why I felt having the louvered fins on this model was going to hurt before.
Next Page »Performance Summary & Performance per Dollar
View as single page
Nov 23rd, 2024 21:46 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts