Wednesday, September 9th 2009
AMD Cypress Graphics Accelerator Pictured
Here's the first sighting of a fully-assembled upcoming AMD Cypress "Radeon HD 5870" accelerator. This photo-shoot comes a couple of days ahead of its unveiling to the press tomorrow. Here's our very first thoughts on what we see:
* Images removed at request of AMD *
Source:
Tweakers.net
- The accelerator is unusually long for a single-GPU one from AMD. The company wouldn't splurge too much on aesthetics (especially lengthening the PCB), if there's no need for it to do so. Apparently there is.
- Connectivity options galore. With two DVI-D, and one each of DisplayPort and HDMI, AMD promises it can handle three display-heads per GPU.
- The components behind the GPU area (exposed) indicates the GPU to be somewhat large
- History tells us that AMD uses a backplate only if it finds a real utility in it, such as cooling additional memory chips or VRM components. This card has a large, almost full-coverage backplate.
* Images removed at request of AMD *
188 Comments on AMD Cypress Graphics Accelerator Pictured
dont expect a pushover
None the less, the 5870 will easily take the HD 4870X2 at similar specs (double from 4870) simply because it is a single GPU and the resources of the card can be better managed, basically no more CF issues.
I guess we will see tomorrow, if it performs worst than the 4870X2 while more expensive, I might just jump on the Green wagon this time.
it doesn't seems to be PCI-E power slots it looks blocked or not opened all way to the fan.
Fck looks i'm more interested in how it performs. Because some thing looks good don't mean it performs good.
And i'm sure manufactures put stickers all over the dam thing anyways.
Originally AMD and ATI were merged ATI is still ATI as was before, but then ATI became AMD subsidary. Well either way , ATI retained every brand name trade mark and logo , so it's ATI Radeon not AMD Radeon (cause nothing is done by AMD other than ownership)
It gets too much distanced away , it can actually lead to forgotting ATI at all cause of associating with AMD.
i make no comment till i see real benches
explains why you didnt reply to me in MSN, at least :toast:
ugh i don't get it, publicity i'd think is exactly what ATI would want right now. i guess maybe y they removed the crysis performance numbers from chiphell is that they aren't done refining drivers?
i was running vista from prior to day 1, just like i am with 7 - and vista was painless, excluding the lack of x64 drivers from some companies.
ATI merely doesnt want a fiasco like that, since they dont have as deep pockets as nvidia or MS to recover from bad publicity (a single article saying that these cards suck cause X game doesnt work, will spread and hurt sales)
Though, if you go by history, I have a fear this card will barely managed to outperform the current single GPU nVidia offerings...
if you say vista is great.
winxp no bsod for a year.
Vista somewhat all the time, switched to win7 leaked beta.
Voila! gone.
Windows experience was faster even that early.
Game experience, same higher or less not a noticable change
Vista also used up more memory that you can put in a 4dimm pc and not to talk about the extra features that you turned off cause each used like 40% cpu for doing nothing.
Vista behaved worse and worse for every file you added on the harddrive and the longer you used it.
It didnt do a SINGLE thing of what i heard on a 5 hour seminar from microsoft, nor did it work on the same computer they demoed it on with aero, which didnt work when it was RTM, was to weak my ass.
Basicly, nothing they promised was there, nor was it any better than XP.
Don't make promises you are in doubt of holding!
Which is smart.
Which is the most fun:
drive a ferrari 430
Drive a ugly piece of car you dont know got 1000 bhp and it is made perfectly and beats youre expectations.
The last works best cause expectations isnt high cause there havnt been much hype, the longer the hype goes on the higher the expectation.
xp is best for older pc's with older drivers(older than 2003)
vista is best for newer pc's with drivers are still supported(newer than 2004)