Monday, April 26th 2010
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 Slated For June
Earlier this month, it came to light that NVIDIA is working on its third GeForce 400 series member, the GeForce GTX 460. A new report suggests that this SKU would be timed to be NVIDIA's front-line release for this year's Computex event, held in Taiwan. The SKU is slated for release in the first week of June. The GeForce GTX 460 will be derived from the GF100 GPU, by further cutting down the available streaming multiprocessor (SM) counts, and trimming the memory interface a little. With four SMs disabled (probably an entire graphics processing cluster or GPC), the GTX 460 has 384 CUDA cores, 32 raster operation processors (ROPs), 48 texture memory units (TMUs) with a 256-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface, to connect to 1 GB of memory. The rest of its feature-set will be common with the GeForce 400 series. It is expected to compete with ATI Radeon HD 5830, at a similar price-point.
Source:
Hardware-Infos
40 Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 Slated For June
I agree though, the price is atrocious, and HD5770 really is the better card, all factors considered.
I can't see this card being competitive enough against the 5850. Maybe the 5830 but that card makes no sense to me. Sure it might be a good card but the only reason I'd ever buy it would be just to get CUDA but that is slowly becoming less attractive these days.
It doesnt look longer than in america, i dont care, ati's prices are right, always compared to how they are in usa, where they compete with nvidia.
Sometimes it is where it should be, but mostly not.
The 285 is still more expensive than 5870 in norway.
Not Nvidias fault though, they use their PR so well, people are just uninformed morrons:shadedshu
@xtremesv: I feel your pain man, Intel and Nvidia are overpriced in our countries:mad:
www.fudzilla.com/content/view/18624/1/
So that would be right between 5830&5850.
AMD is confortable enough to lower the HD5850's price, as soon as the GTX460 is announced.
In fact gf104 continues to be a great breeze of fresh air continuing delivering great performance in mainstream like g94 was 9600gt against older g92 that has twice as much shading power. And if we put into equation that gf100 was underperforming chip and gtx470 was 7/8 of full product and perform much better than burning gtx480 (7.5/8 of full gf100) we see that hitting close to gtx470 with only 75% SPs of that in gtx470 but that can squeeze out more with much less leakage that might be the reason why gf104 and future product gtx475 (based on 100% working chip) is much better solution.
btw. nVidia is famous for it's "driver optimizations" or tweak'n'cheat approach and to hell with it it would be ok if we dont saw all that tesselation improvements and which otoh cause some frame drops. The only bad thing is that flucking nVidia canceled gt200b production when they released their cardboardware fermi g300 chip last October (2009).
And bad thing could be if ATI wouldn't play price reduction game and let nVida sale their gtx460 cards (as they do now) much higher than nV announced MSRP of 200 USD for 768MB and 220USD for 1024MB version