Wednesday, March 21st 2012

Windows 8 Launches in October, x86 and ARM Simultaneously

We know from a slightly older article, that the first variants of Windows will be released to market some time in Q4-2012. A new report by Bloomberg pin-points that to October, exactly 3 years after the market-launch of Windows 7. Further, Microsoft should launch Windows 8 for both x86 and ARM machine architectures around the same time, in what could be a breather for tablet and low-cost netbook designers. Despite that, there are fewer ARM devices running Windows 8, which will launch around that time, than x86 notebooks/PCs. With an October 2012 launch Microsoft should be able to target shoppers in the crucial winter shopping season, in mature markets, according to Bloomberg Analysts.
Sources: Bloomberg, VR-Zone
Add your own comment

36 Comments on Windows 8 Launches in October, x86 and ARM Simultaneously

#26
Frick
Fishfaced Nincompoop
If there are good deals to be had I'll probably get it.

People hate it more than necessary imo. It deserves critic but it has its moments.
Posted on Reply
#27
naram-sin
Using Win 8 Consumer Preview on my business laptop for a week now and it works really well... subjectively, I think it's more responsive than 7 and although I was skeptical and initially annoyed with Metro on a desktop OS, I can say that it really takes a day or two to get used to it. And ergonomically it is much simpler to use than classic Start menu, because buttons are larger, their size as well as whole Metro content is customizable, and can hold more...

For now, I feel like that same tools (mouse&keyboard) can enable to you to do at least 150% more work with Win 8; also all my existing apps are working fine.

Win 8, regardless of usual Microsoft related rants (justified or otherwise), just seems to me as a good step forward. And also it seems very stable. I just had one single problem - domain joining, but I'll take it as a CP version "feature"...

And finally, I think that possible lack of field testing won't be an issue - Win 8 (x86/x64) should have similar compatibility "level" as 7 and you should even be able to to an in-place upgrade of 7...

Also, I did a clean install on my comp; next step: Win 8 upgrade of Win 7 (it worked ok for a VM, but we didn't test much).
Posted on Reply
#28
naram-sin
DepthI can't stand the logo. The window is pointing the wrong way. Started out as a minor annoyance but now I need a "fix" every time I see it

www.techpowerup.com/img/12-02-28/223a.jpg

i15.photobucket.com/albums/a367/Unit420/windows_8_logo-900x542.jpg?t=1331993639

Aaah...
Actually, after I gave it a thorough thought, I completely disagree. I think that, since I am left-to-right reading person, for me it is more "natural" that logo starts narrow on the left and then gets wider to the right. I dunno, it just kinda feels "right"... :o
Posted on Reply
#29
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
8 is starting to remind me of a mobile phone only OS and reminds me of win 3.1 quite a bit
Posted on Reply
#30
trickson
OH, I have such a headache
Prima.VeraWindows 8 is for AMD users. It is rumored to offer a 0.00001% increase in performance over Win 7...:D
OMG no you didn't :laugh:

Windows 8, I do not see the real appeal at all. Kind of plain looking and looks a bit less user friendly to be honest. But this is more for tablets and touch screen users, Not the real desk top user. Metro :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#31
naoan
eidairaman18 is starting to remind me of a mobile phone only OS and reminds me of win 3.1 quite a bit


:laugh:
Posted on Reply
#33
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
digibuccif i can ask, what does it offer to make it worthy of a release day upgrade on your main machine? especially if you are disabling metro?
Pretty much the same level of minor appealing visual tweaks that Win7 offered over Vista.

I prefer the new task manager and the new file copy/move dialog, as well as the ribbon in explorer and most importantly an up button.

Oh, plus I get it for free. If I didn't get it for free I wouldn't bother, but then again if I didn't get Win7 for free I wouldn't have bothered to upgrade to that since it doesn't offer anything worth the $150 over Vista.
Posted on Reply
#35
digibucc
newtekie1Oh, plus I get it for free.
lol, yeah that's a fine reason. i would be using it as well :)

i really like the task manager and file copy dialog as well, but again - it's not free...
Posted on Reply
#36
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
digibucclol, yeah that's a fine reason. i would be using it as well :)

i really like the task manager and file copy dialog as well, but again - it's not free...
Yeah, like I said, if you have to pay for the OS there isn't much reason to upgrade from Vista actually. Ignoring Metro, Win8 offers just about the same level of improvements over Win7 that Win7 offered over Vista.

And I'm going to tell people the same thing I told them when Win7 came out and they asked me if they should upgrade from Vista: "If you are buying a new computer and it comes with Win8, then get Win8, otherwise stick with what you have now."
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 26th, 2024 10:41 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts