Wednesday, March 21st 2012
Windows 8 Launches in October, x86 and ARM Simultaneously
We know from a slightly older article, that the first variants of Windows will be released to market some time in Q4-2012. A new report by Bloomberg pin-points that to October, exactly 3 years after the market-launch of Windows 7. Further, Microsoft should launch Windows 8 for both x86 and ARM machine architectures around the same time, in what could be a breather for tablet and low-cost netbook designers. Despite that, there are fewer ARM devices running Windows 8, which will launch around that time, than x86 notebooks/PCs. With an October 2012 launch Microsoft should be able to target shoppers in the crucial winter shopping season, in mature markets, according to Bloomberg Analysts.
Sources:
Bloomberg, VR-Zone
36 Comments on Windows 8 Launches in October, x86 and ARM Simultaneously
Vista ftw! :D
only that no TSR/ Processes are closed.
Next up: the memory footprint for the kernel. Like the System process, memory footprint tends to vary widely from version to version, with successive releases showing an ever-expanding kernel working set. Based on the thread count values I observed in my previous example, I anticipated that the working set would be similar to Vista's. And in keeping with my initial suspicions, Windows 7's System process indeed consumed a similar amount of memory (3.5MB to 4.5MB). So far, the new OS was looking a lot like Vista.
In fact, the kernel in each major new version of the Windows OS has spawned a different, typically higher number of threads. So when I examined Windows 7 and found a nearly identical thread count (97 to 100) for the System process, I knew right away that I was dealing with a minor point-type of release, as opposed to a major update or rewrite.
Aaah...
with blue color
umm btw i dunno win 8 will success or not, if win 8 just offer some better from win 7 and with metro interface that looks dumb, i guess win 8 would get harder to replace win7 :D
Microsoft doesn't understand the tablet market. Never have - Never will. In the past they have always simply tried to cram full Windows onto tablets and its failed for them everytime.
So this time they just cripple the desktop OS and force everybody to use their 'me too!' interface.. I want to call it 'ME 2.0' or the 'Hipster OS' as that what it feels like. Fake glasses on some fake person trying to be something they obviously are not.
I have had all the versions of windows all the way back to 2.0. This is the first one I am not looking forward to and I'll try to skip. Unless.. Allow me to NOT boot into metro and put the damn start button back. Then... maaaaaaybe....
and YES the logo looks better facing to the right.
The vast majority of computers are mass produced OEM not home built. OS upgrades are likely a smaller subset of OS sales. New computers (and now some ARM tablets too) will be sold with Windows 8 even if there is a step down program. So Windows 8 basically already has a level of built in success,…if sales is how you measure success.
I’ll certainly run Windows 8 but I’ll be doing so through TechNet. I have an Asus Eee Slate EP121 Windows 7 PC tablet (Core i5). As much as I like Windows 7, I don’t consider it to be well suited for a tablet so I’m looking forward to the upgrade there.
In a lot of cases this is simply an issue of preference. If someone doesn’t like it and doesn’t want anything to do with it that’s fine but it doesn’t mean there is anything wrong with the OS.
Oh and I dont care which way the logo goes,....6 of one, half a dozen of the other,....IMO.
Reversing the paine puts you in the room with Windows 8.
On a visual level I like the reversed image but thats not the image Microsoft is selling.