Saturday, June 22nd 2013
Custom NVIDIA GTX 760 Card Pictured And Tested
With the official GeForce GTX 760 launch imminent, leaked specs, benchmark scores and pics are to be expected. That is precisely what we are looking at today, a card branded Xenon JetStream, sporting the familiar Palit aesthetics, apparently Xenon being a Palit sub-brand for the South Korean market. The images, specs and scores come from the ChipHell boards, where they were posted by forum member Charlie.
The card itself is very small, apparently a non-reference design, making use of an over-sized dual fan cooler, known to us from various GTX 600 generation cards, sold by Palit under the JetStream moniker. The GPU specs confirm the previous leaks, boasting 1152 CUDA cores, 96 TMUs and 32 ROPs. This particular card comes factory overclocked, with the base clock set at 1072 MHz and the boost clock 65 Mhz higher, at 1137 MHz. The GDDR5 memory, 2 GB on this model, comes with a slight overclock as well, 1550 Mhz precisely (6200 Mhz effective speed). Performance wise, the card did slightly better than a stock GTX 670, so keeping in mind the lower stock clocks of the reference GTX 760 card, we can expect it to perform slightly worse than a stock GTX 670.
The card itself is very small, apparently a non-reference design, making use of an over-sized dual fan cooler, known to us from various GTX 600 generation cards, sold by Palit under the JetStream moniker. The GPU specs confirm the previous leaks, boasting 1152 CUDA cores, 96 TMUs and 32 ROPs. This particular card comes factory overclocked, with the base clock set at 1072 MHz and the boost clock 65 Mhz higher, at 1137 MHz. The GDDR5 memory, 2 GB on this model, comes with a slight overclock as well, 1550 Mhz precisely (6200 Mhz effective speed). Performance wise, the card did slightly better than a stock GTX 670, so keeping in mind the lower stock clocks of the reference GTX 760 card, we can expect it to perform slightly worse than a stock GTX 670.
14 Comments on Custom NVIDIA GTX 760 Card Pictured And Tested
That would make it an excellent deal at it's projected price :rockout:
nVidia should try to released their product that 3 or 4 generation more than AMD in order to dominate the GPU market. Look at what Intel already did to AMD
For the Intel part, first the delay the K10 (Phenom 2008) which should be compete with Core 2, then after that got TLB bug with that one too... Then Bulldozer released (2011) which they should be compete with Nehalem but even Intel Core 2 processor or K10 can still beat bulldozer in not heavily thread software. Then comes Piledriver, which the bulldozer should be but still unable to beat Nehalem in benchmark (well, maybe some program faster)
So Intel Core, Nehalem, Sandy Bridge now Haswell
AMD K10, Bulldozer, Piledriver (which is still struggling to even beat Nehalem)
but the card looks nice and from outside looks pretty solid