Friday, March 20th 2015

Palit Announces the GeForce GTX 960 JetStream 4 GB

Palit announced the GeForce GTX 960 4 GB JetStream graphics card, its first GTX 960 with double its standard memory amount. The card features Palit's fiery red cooler featured on its GTX 960 Super JetStream graphics card, and achieves its 4 GB memory amount using eight 4 Gb GDDR5 memory chips. The card also offers a factory-overclock, with its core clocked at 1127 MHz, and with a GPU Boost frequency of 1178 MHz. The memory is kept untouched at 7.00 GHz (GDDR5-effective). The card draws power from a single 6-pin PCIe power connector, display outputs include two DVI, and one each of HDMI 2.0 and DisplayPort 1.2. The company didn't announce pricing or availability.
Add your own comment

29 Comments on Palit Announces the GeForce GTX 960 JetStream 4 GB

#2
Caring1
btarunrachieves its 4 GB memory amount using eight 4 Gb GDDR5 memory chips.
My math must be wrong, it's been a while since I was at school ... o_O
Posted on Reply
#3
RCoon
Caring1My math must be wrong, it's been a while since I was at school ... o_O
Gb, not GB. Eight Gigabits in a Gigabyte.

4Gb = 0.5 GB
0.5GB x 8 = 4GB
Posted on Reply
#4
Caring1
Why didn't they say so :p
Posted on Reply
#5
DeSanta
Nice, lower tier card with 0.5GB more than higher GTX 970, makes sense ;)
silapakornLooks like MSI gaming series.
Great and all, but I'd still pick Palit over MSI any day. Too bad Palit doesn't sell their Jetsreams in the US.
Posted on Reply
#6
HisDivineOrder
Great.

Where's the 8GB version of the 980 and 7GB version of the 970, nVidia? You know? The cards most of us want AND may can afford.
Posted on Reply
#7
Darksword
HisDivineOrderGreat.

Where's the 8GB version of the 980 and 7GB version of the 970, nVidia? You know? The cards most of us want AND may can afford.
They want you to spend $1,000.00 for an overpriced Titan X instead.
Posted on Reply
#8
m6tzg6r
DeSantaNice, lower tier card with 0.5GB more than higher GTX 970, makes sense ;)
HAHAHAHA True story.
Posted on Reply
#9
Primey_
If any game requires near 4GB of vram usage then it's probably running extremely high settings which the 960 won't perform well in. What's the point of high vram on low end gpus
DeSantaNice, lower tier card with 0.5GB more than higher GTX 970, makes sense ;)
Stop beating a dead horse
Posted on Reply
#10
rtwjunkie
PC Gaming Enthusiast
Primey_If any game requires near 4GB of vram usage then it's probably running extremely high settings which the 960 won't perform well in. What's the point of high vram on low end gpus



Stop beating a dead horse
Well, it's not a lower-tier card. It's a mid-tier, just like the 760 and 660 were that it replaces. And per the reviews by W1zzard, it beats them both in every test, is right behind the 770 in most tests, even beating it a couple times. a few games it was even within spitting distance of the 780. Not bad at all for a mid-tier. 4GB can easily be used in games wihich require alot of VRAM for textures. A few I can think that I have are Watch Dogs, Sleeping Dogs, and heavily modded FNV and Skyrim.
Posted on Reply
#11
KarymidoN
After buyng an GTX 970 i will never trust in 4GB from nVidia...
Posted on Reply
#12
rtwjunkie
PC Gaming Enthusiast
KarymidoNAfter buyng an GTX 970 i will never trust in 4GB from nVidia...
It's a completely different chipset from the 980/970. The 970 was crippled memory-wise because of it being a cut down 980. The 960 is a different maxwell chip designed from the ground up.
Posted on Reply
#13
KarymidoN
rtwjunkieIt's a completely different chipset from the 980/970. The 970 was crippled memory-wise because of it being a cut down 980. The 960 is a different maxwell chip designed from the ground up.
nVidia lie to me, in ROPS, l2 Cache and memory... my next GPU = 100% AMD.
Posted on Reply
#14
rtwjunkie
PC Gaming Enthusiast
KarymidoNnVidia lie to me, in ROPS, l2 Cache and memory... my next GPU = 100% AMD.
But, did that change the performance of your card? If it did, then exchange it. No reason to be unhappy if you feel the stats changed the performance overnight.
Posted on Reply
#15
KarymidoN
rtwjunkieBut, did that change the performance of your card? If it did, then exchange it. No reason to be unhappy if you feel the stats changed the performance overnight.
send away my plans to SLI GTX 970 for 4K Gaming... 3,5gb memory for 4k gaming, even with SLI is noth enough...
Posted on Reply
#16
64K
imo the Maxwells are ranked in terms of gaming right now

High End
Titan X (so far)

Mid Range
GTX 980 upper mid range
GTX 970 mid range
GTX 960 lower end mid range

Entry Level
GTX 750 Ti upper entry level
GTX 750 mid range entry level

There are three notable holes that Nvidia has yet to fill imo.
1) More entry level Maxwells.
2) A GM206 performing between the previous Kepler 770 and 780 or a cut down GM204 for the mid range market that performs between a 770 and a 780.
3) A GM200 gaming only card with 6 GB VRAM and higher core clocks for ~$700 that will be faster than a Titan X in gaming.
Posted on Reply
#17
Primey_
KarymidoNsend away my plans to SLI GTX 970 for 4K Gaming... 3,5gb memory for 4k gaming, even with SLI is noth enough...
Neither is 4GB so why are you complaining?
Posted on Reply
#18
KarymidoN
Primey_Neither is 4GB so why are you complaining?
nVidia fanboy detected? 4GB for the games i wanna play is enough to 4k with some decent fps, but thanks to nVidia i have my GTX 970 3,5GB ready to play in 1080p till i buy my R9 390X and play in my 4K TV...
Posted on Reply
#19
ShiBDiB
Primey_Neither is 4GB so why are you complaining?
Don't feed the troll
Posted on Reply
#20
RichF
Primey_Stop beating a dead horse
Right, because the 970 isn't still being sold right now. :rolleyes:
Posted on Reply
#21
RichF
rtwjunkieBut, did that change the performance of your card? If it did, then exchange it. No reason to be unhappy if you feel the stats changed the performance overnight.
Fallacy of omission.
Posted on Reply
#22
rtwjunkie
PC Gaming Enthusiast
RichFFallacy of omission.
If the spec change makes him unhappy he should get something else. Trolling a product announcement isn't going to solve anything, and life is too short to continue to use a product that makes someone unhappy.
Posted on Reply
#23
rruff
Can somebody smart answer this?

On the 960 the memory bus seems to be a limiting factor more so than the 2GB of vram. Since the bus doesn't change when more vram is added, isn't 4GB serious overkill? Even if you could load bigger textures, the bus wouldn't be able to supply them at a decent frame rate. And that is assuming that the card would be able to process the frames at a decent rate.

In SLI with alternating frame rendering, does this issue go away? I'm thinking it does, since each GPU has twice as long to render a frame the bus will be adequate, and the 4GB of vram will be great if your goal is a more detailed image.
Posted on Reply
#24
RCoon
rruffOn the 960 the memory bus seems to be a limiting factor more so than the 2GB of vram. Since the bus doesn't change when more vram is added, isn't 4GB serious overkill? Even if you could load bigger textures, the bus wouldn't be able to supply them at a decent frame rate. And that is assuming that the card would be able to process the frames at a decent rate.
See this article. Though one thing that research outlines is that memory bandwidth is in line with GPU usage. At 1080p and below it's less of a problem.
KarymidoN4GB for the games i wanna play is enough to 4k with some decent fps
No, no it's not. No single GPU setup is capable of putting out 4K at decent FPS with 4GB. Even 980 SLI struggles to put out ~45 FPS. If you're buying a single 970 4GB for 4K gaming, you're doing it wrong.
Posted on Reply
#25
KarymidoN
No, no it's not. No single GPU setup is capable of putting out 4K at decent FPS with 4GB. Even 980 SLI struggles to put out ~45 FPS. If you're buying a single 970 4GB for 4K gaming, you're doing it wrong.
Friend, I do not intend to play BF, COD, AC, etc. The game that I play I'm sure 4GB of VRAM can handle at 4K, my neighbor has a CFX R9 290X and plays the same MMO I play at 4K smoothly and above 60fps ... bought the TV's 4k together but he already had a R9 290X and bought another for crossfirex, my choice is now buy a R9 390X and get rid of my GTX 970, which is very good for 1080p, wheel almost anything above 60fps, but it is useless for high resolutions.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 26th, 2024 18:55 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts