Tuesday, May 3rd 2016

Intel Core i7-6850K Pictured, Tested

Intel's upcoming Core i7-6850K six-core processor made its way to the hands of an enthusiast on OCN, who wasted no time in picturing the chip, and putting it through a few handy tests. Built for the LGA2011v3 socket, the i7-6850K is based on the 14 nm "Broadwell-E" silicon, and features six cores, HyperThreading enabling 12 logical CPUs, 15 MB of L3 cache, and a nominal clock speed of 3.60 GHz. To begin with, while the i7-6850K is pin-compatible with existing socket LGA2011v3 motherboards (and logically features an identical pin-map to "Haswell-E,") the package is slightly different. Its fiberglass substrate is slightly thinner (1.12 mm vs. 1.87 mm of "Haswell-E,"). Its thickness is made up for by a chunkier IHS (integrated heatspreader).

The i7-6850K sample was installed on a machine with ASRock X99 Extreme3 motherboard (BIOS: P3.30), 16 GB of quad-channel DDR4-2133 memory, and a single GeForce GTX 980 Ti graphics card. It was compared to a Core i7-5820K processor on the same setup. The i7-6850K based setup was barely (~1%) faster at 3DMark FireStrike Extreme in its final score, however, its CPU-intensive Physics score was 14.9% higher. Moving on to the community favorite Cinebench R15, the i7-6850K yielded a 10% higher score. To test its single-core performance, the chip was put through SuperPi 32M, where the i7-6850K crunched through the test in 8m 27.854s, compared to 8m 38.866s by the i7-5820K.
Source: OCN
Add your own comment

31 Comments on Intel Core i7-6850K Pictured, Tested

#26
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
That's fair maybe I'm to used to amd
Posted on Reply
#27
EarthDog
Uhhh yeah, apples and something not round or a fruit there bud! :)

(also did a quick edit of that post for clarity)
Posted on Reply
#29
InVasMani
R-T-BThe whole thickness of the substrate thing isn't really worth worrying about if coolers are just made properly and you know not to literally crush your CPU by over tightening.
Expensive fragile and brittle great combination can totally see why you'd be in favor of that combination if your heavily invested into Intel stocks. I know I'd be rather upset if I crushed one of those by mistake trying to mount it due to it being weak as a thin wheat cracker. Slight exaggeration sure, but it illustrates a direction I don't think many people are exactly "enthusiastic" to head in.
Posted on Reply
#30
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
InVasManiExpensive fragile and brittle great combination can totally see why you'd be in favor of that combination if your heavily invested into Intel stocks. I know I'd be rather upset if I crushed one of those by mistake trying to mount it due to it being weak as a thin wheat cracker. Slight exaggeration sure, but it illustrates a direction I don't think many people are exactly "enthusiastic" to head in.
I have literally mounted hundreds of skylake chips air and water. Honestly if you break/bend the pcb you should rethink life for a while and probably stop touching computers.
Posted on Reply
#31
EarthDog
cdawallI have literally mounted hundreds of skylake chips air and water. Honestly if you break/bend the pcb you should rethink life for a while and probably stop touching computers.
This. A little common sense goes a long way. :)
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 21st, 2024 05:46 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts