Wednesday, June 13th 2018

Intel Readying 22-core LGA2066 and 8-core LGA1151 Processors
Intel is readying a refresh to its "Basin Falls" HEDT platform (LGA2066 client high-end desktop), with a new 22-core silicon. This part is neither Skylake HCC (20 tiles, up to 18 cores) nor Skylake XCC (30 tiles, up to 28 cores), but a new die with four more tiles than the Skylake HCC silicon, all of which are cores. The new silicon could let Intel design 20-core and 22-core SKUs for the X299 Express chipset, and is seen as a direct response to AMD's 24-core Ryzen Threadripper II processor, which was recently shown beating the 18-core i9-7980X in tech demos. The 32-core Threadripper II could face competition from the 28-core HEDT processor Intel is readying for Q4-2018, but that processor won't be compatible with LGA2066.
In related news, the company is giving finishing touches to a new 8-core "Coffee Lake" die for the mainstream-desktop platform (LGA1151 socket, 300-series chipset). This die features 8 cores, and likely 16 MB of shared L3 cache, while retaining the iGPU and uncore components from the existing Coffee Lake-S die. The chip could retain the classic "Ring Bus" design. The new 8-core mainstream-desktop SKUs, and at least two new high-end desktop SKUs (20-core and 22-core), could be launched in September 2018. The "Basin Falls" refresh, coupled with the new LGA3647 "Purley" derivative for the 28-core monstrosity, will be all Intel has to face AMD this year, with the company's next HEDT silicon, "Cascade Lake-X" being reportedly delayed to the second half of 2019, probably due to foundry problems.
Source:
PC Watch
In related news, the company is giving finishing touches to a new 8-core "Coffee Lake" die for the mainstream-desktop platform (LGA1151 socket, 300-series chipset). This die features 8 cores, and likely 16 MB of shared L3 cache, while retaining the iGPU and uncore components from the existing Coffee Lake-S die. The chip could retain the classic "Ring Bus" design. The new 8-core mainstream-desktop SKUs, and at least two new high-end desktop SKUs (20-core and 22-core), could be launched in September 2018. The "Basin Falls" refresh, coupled with the new LGA3647 "Purley" derivative for the 28-core monstrosity, will be all Intel has to face AMD this year, with the company's next HEDT silicon, "Cascade Lake-X" being reportedly delayed to the second half of 2019, probably due to foundry problems.
40 Comments on Intel Readying 22-core LGA2066 and 8-core LGA1151 Processors
I can personally vouch for rooms being dramatically warmer after an 8800GTX system had been running for a little while. No modern system I've owned or worked with has done that for a long time.
Also, I can't claim to have perfect information, but is it possible that the 115W TDP back in the prescott days was not the same sort of number we get from Intel today for 95W parts, or there's some other factor at play?
The reason I ask that question is, It seems to me if a Prescott with 8800GTX SLI, was under 450W draw for those components, then we could expect maybe 550W draw for what, at the time was the most power hungry rig a consumer could reasonably build.
If that's the number we're dealing with, why was it that the majority of tech coverage at the time, and even Nvidia's own SLI Certified PSU programme, were recommending PSU's well above 800W, into the 1KW or 1.2KW range?
Ex, their existing and confusing 22 Cores CPU:
Needless to say I for one don't believe in the benevolence of profit making corporations.
As for TDPs, saying they've changed for the worse is... pushing it. Sure, turbo modes exceed TDP, but not in any way that's even remotely harmful. Mostly, modern TDPs are realistic and accurate in terms of sustained power draw and heat output at full load. Some GPUs in particular peak much higher, but not in a way that makes any real difference in load on the PSU or necessary cooler quality. Of course motherboards with various overboost modes ("multi-core enhancement" and similar auto-overclocked) blow CPUs past TDP easily, but that's not the fault of the CPU or the TDP rating.
Right now I am looking at the 1700 8core / 16 threads @ 65watts seems nice .... However I am in no rush ... and if them 16 core threadripps are going too drop in price ... I might jump to one of them .
Anyhow .. THANK YOU AMD !