Tuesday, September 18th 2018

MyDigitalSSD Introduces M2X External USB Enclosure for NVMe, M.2 SSDs

MyDigitalSSD is out with a relatively ingenious solution for users looking to get the best portable, external SSD performance available. Their new M2X external M.2 enclosure will allow users to create an external storage solution via a DIY kit. The M2X is built on JMicron's JMS583 USB 3.1 Gen 2 to PCIe 3.1 x2 bridge chip (meaning that a PCIe 2x NVMe will be sufficient in maxing out available performance), will only be limited by USB 3.1 Gen 2's 1GB/s throughput. The DIY assembly packs a thermal pad and the enclosure, as well as USB Type-C and Type-A cables, and will be available from Amazon for $39.99 or through MyDigitalDiscount for $36.14.
Source: AnandTech
Add your own comment

13 Comments on MyDigitalSSD Introduces M2X External USB Enclosure for NVMe, M.2 SSDs

#1
bonehead123
as yoda would say:

"Fast is not, this x2 drive", hehehe
Posted on Reply
#2
warrior420
bonehead123as yoda would say:

"Fast is not, this x2 drive", hehehe
I'm guessing you have a faster external enclosure?
Posted on Reply
#3
Prima.Vera
bonehead123as yoda would say:

"Fast is not, this x2 drive", hehehe
Yeah. 1GB/s it's not fast enough for an USB drive.... /facepalm
Posted on Reply
#4
Caring1
Prima.VeraYeah. 1GB/s it's not fast enough for an USB drive.... /facepalm
When USB3.1 Gen 1 is capable of 5GBps and Gen 2 10GBps, then 1GBps seems insufficient.
Methinks a typo occurred in the writeup and it is meant to be 10GBps, not 1GBps.
@Raevenlord
Posted on Reply
#5
warrior420
Caring1When USB3.1 Gen 1 is capable of 5Gbps and Gen 2 10Gbps, then 1Gbps seems insufficient.
Methinks a typo occurred in the writeup and it is meant to be 10Gbps, not 1Gbps.
@Raevenlord
1GB/s ≠ 1Gb/s
Posted on Reply
#6
Caring1
warrior4201GB/s ≠ 1Gb/s
Thanks Captain obvious for the detailed explanation.
My own typo has been corrected now, care to explain now how the O.P. is correct and I am wrong?
Posted on Reply
#7
hat
Enthusiast
USB 3.1 Gen 2 is 10 gigabits per second Gb/s. The OP says USB 3.1 Gen 2 is 1 gigabyte per second (GB/s), which comes out to 8Gb/s, so it is a little off there... should be 1.25GB/s.
Posted on Reply
#8
Prima.Vera
Caring1When USB3.1 Gen 1 is capable of 5GBps and Gen 2 10GBps, then 1GBps seems insufficient.
Methinks a typo occurred in the writeup and it is meant to be 10GBps, not 1GBps.
@Raevenlord
Dude, 1GB/s = 8Gb/s, so in theory an SSD drive can go a little faster than that considering the USB overhead is usually ~10%
Posted on Reply
#9
warrior420
Caring1Thanks Captain obvious for the detailed explanation.
My own typo has been corrected now, care to explain now how the O.P. is correct and I am wrong?
Well, if you think that this USB drive, or any USB3.1 G2 will be anywhere close to 1.25GB/s, you're mistaking... 1GB/s is much more realistic. I mean, we are talking about JMicron here...
Posted on Reply
#10
kastriot
Still shooting the breeze eh guys :)
Posted on Reply
#11
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
Caring1Thanks Captain obvious for the detailed explanation.
My own typo has been corrected now, care to explain now how the O.P. is correct and I am wrong?
You are wrong because USB3.1 Gen 1 is not capable of 5GBps, it is capable of 5Gbps, or 0.625GBps. And USB3.1 Gen 2 is not capable of 10GBps it is capable of 10Gbps, or 1.25GBps.

The typo is your's, the original news story is correct.
Posted on Reply
#12
Arjai
All this bit and byte talk is making me hungry. I gotta go find something to byte into.
:kookoo:
Posted on Reply
#13
Prima.Vera
ArjaiAll this bit and byte talk is making me hungry. I gotta go find something to byte into.
:kookoo:
You mean "bite". :laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 22nd, 2024 01:46 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts