Not bad if you want to make a low power NAS. You might want a RAID card to hook up more drives though.

This seems like a product that should have launched two years ago, considering it's based on a mobile APU from 2015... I feel like the only selling point left for this after the release of the Ryzen mobile and Athlon parts is the relatively strong IGP. I hope this is priced well to offset the lackluster specs, like Kabini levels perhaps.

FouquinThis seems like a product that should have launched two years ago, considering it's based on a mobile APU from 2015...

It's supposed to be a high-performance APU for laptops, but due to HP's f#$% up it was not successful, if not a complete failure (TDP cap, bad optimisation of hybrid graphics etc.).
BIOSTAR probably got a batch of those for really cheap.
There are, however, few things I don't like about this product:
1) HSF is too small. It's a bad sign that these chips are also capped at 15W TDP and will suffer from the same "hiccups" as HP laptops, including media acceleration and raw CPU perf
2) They went ahead with DDR4 instead of DDR3, which will only increase the overall cost of your HTPC system
3) No WiFi, and no WiFi slot
4) Only 2 SATA, and that PCIe is wired to x1, which can only accommodate cheap crappy 2-port SATA expansion cards. Can't install a decent RAID controller (e.g. it's also bad choice for NAS).
5) SoC only supports HDMI 1.4, which also makes it a bad modern HTPC (max output is 4K@24Hz, and if it's as bad as it was on laptops - might as well run it at 1080p)
6) Only one shitty RTL8111 NIC, adding "bad edge router" to the bad list.

So, it's not NAS board, it's not HTPC board, not router board and the only remaining use for it is badly planned miniature office PCs or overpriced thin clients.

I love BIOSTAR, but sometimes they make very funny design choices.

This thing looks very, very similar to the Biostar A68N boards that had various AMD APUs (Kabini to Carrizo iirc). I nearly bought one of those for a small, cheap PC for my in-Laws home. Those were mostly 19W and 25W CPUs for the big cores and 15W for the small cores. If this thing is as cheap (60-70€), it might get a few sales.

silentbogo1)2)3)4)5)6)

1) Website says 15W TDP already.
2) Yup, although DDR3 is getting up there in price. Unless you get a good deal from a private individual. I personally wouldn't buy a new system that relied on DDR3. If you want DDR3, buy a good used system (Sandy-Bridge, Ivy-Bridge, Haswell are all capable and cheap). If you get something new (for warranty etc.) go with DDR4.
4) Is that PCIe slot wired for x1? The website says x16 and the previous versions of the A68N were either x4 (Kabini) or x8 (Carrizo), so Biostar has been good about not lying in their spec sheet. The M.2 slots takes 4 lanes, but that would still leave the possibility of an x4 slot (I don't have the block diagram on hand).
5) They really should have used displayport as well, which is supported natively. HDMI 1.4 sucks in 2019.
Overall, this is a bit of an odd one. Unless the 25W TDP of something like the Biostar A686N-5745 with an A10-5745 allows it to stretch its legs a bit more, this is more powerful (2.9 GHz vs 3.4 GHz, 384 VLIW Shaders @ 626 MHz vs 512 GCN Shaders @ 800 MHz, 32nm vs 28nm, only the L2 Cache is in Carrizos favour, 4MB vs 2MB). But still nowhere near powerful enough that I would consider it, since it is a dead end system.

Deathy1) Website says 15W TDP already.

I didn't even look at specs at that point. Just by looking at heatsink I figured that it's a TDP-capped version (TBH, it's kinda small even for 15W SoC).

DeathyIs that PCIe slot wired for x1? The website says x16

On the product page if you look at top-down image of the board, you can see that only one lane is wired to the slot.

Your A68N had a PCIe x4 routed to x16 slot, so at least you could get a RAID card, dual/quad NIC or a decent LP GPU running without issues or bottlenecks.

DeathyThis thing looks very, very similar to the Biostar A68N boards that had various AMD APUs (Kabini to Carrizo iirc). I nearly bought one of those for a small, cheap PC for my in-Laws home. Those were mostly 19W and 25W CPUs for the big cores and 15W for the small cores. If this thing is as cheap (60-70€), it might get a few sales.

1) Website says 15W TDP already.
2) Yup, although DDR3 is getting up there in price. Unless you get a good deal from a private individual. I personally wouldn't buy a new system that relied on DDR3. If you want DDR3, buy a good used system (Sandy-Bridge, Ivy-Bridge, Haswell are all capable and cheap). If you get something new (for warranty etc.) go with DDR4.
4) Is that PCIe slot wired for x1? The website says x16 and the previous versions of the A68N were either x4 (Kabini) or x8 (Carrizo), so Biostar has been good about not lying in their spec sheet. The M.2 slots takes 4 lanes, but that would still leave the possibility of an x4 slot (I don't have the block diagram on hand).
5) They really should have used displayport as well, which is supported natively. HDMI 1.4 sucks in 2019.
Overall, this is a bit of an odd one. Unless the 25W TDP of something like the Biostar A686N-5745 with an A10-5745 allows it to stretch its legs a bit more, this is more powerful (2.9 GHz vs 3.4 GHz, 384 VLIW Shaders @ 626 MHz vs 512 GCN Shaders @ 800 MHz, 32nm vs 28nm, only the L2 Cache is in Carrizos favour, 4MB vs 2MB). But still nowhere near powerful enough that I would consider it, since it is a dead end system.

I still have the A68N-5000. Quad core kabini @ 1.5ghz. It was a little slow, but it could handle HTPC duties as an HD-DVR and it could stream HD video. In both cases, the CPU was near 100%, but it worked. With an SSD, it’s not too bad with Linux or Windows 10 either. This board should easily be better than that, if only for the better memory bus—the A4-5000 was DDR3-1600 in single channel.

Super cheap, low power, in ITX for a secondary or back up SFF PC build. Add HDD, RAM, a supported O/S, and USB WIFI device and connect! I don't see a reason for argument here. None. It is what it is.

Interesting board that keeps things to a minimal, should be good for basic functions