Friday, May 3rd 2019
Possible Listings of AMD Ryzen 9 3800X, Ryzen 7 3700X, Ryzen 5 3600X Surface in Online Stores
Remember to bring your osmosis process to the table here, as a good deal of salt is detected present in this story's environment. Some online webstores from Vietnam and Turkey have started listing AMD's 3000 series CPUs based on the Zen 2 architecture. The present company stands at a Ryzen 9 3800X, Ryzen 7 3700X, and Ryzen 5 3600X, and the specs on these are... Incredible, to say the least.
The Ryzen 9 3800X is being listed with 32 threads, meaning a base 16-core processor. Clock speeds are being reported as 3.9 GHz base with up to 4.7 GHz Turbo on both a Turkish and Vietnamese etailer's webpages. The Turkish Store then stands alone in listing AMD's Ryzen 7 3700X CPU, which is reported as having 12 cores, 24 threads, and operating at an extremely impressive 4.2 GHz base and 5.0 GHz Boost clocks. Another listing by the same website, in the form of the Ryzen 5 3600X, details the processor as having 8 physical cores and running at 4.0 GHz base and 4.8 Boost clocks.
Sources:
TPU Forums @Thread starter R0H1T, nguyencongpc.vn, ebrarbilgisayar.com
The Ryzen 9 3800X is being listed with 32 threads, meaning a base 16-core processor. Clock speeds are being reported as 3.9 GHz base with up to 4.7 GHz Turbo on both a Turkish and Vietnamese etailer's webpages. The Turkish Store then stands alone in listing AMD's Ryzen 7 3700X CPU, which is reported as having 12 cores, 24 threads, and operating at an extremely impressive 4.2 GHz base and 5.0 GHz Boost clocks. Another listing by the same website, in the form of the Ryzen 5 3600X, details the processor as having 8 physical cores and running at 4.0 GHz base and 4.8 Boost clocks.
242 Comments on Possible Listings of AMD Ryzen 9 3800X, Ryzen 7 3700X, Ryzen 5 3600X Surface in Online Stores
They can significantly improve the clocks and add more cores at the same time, why not?
Mainstream Intel's 8C were announced 2 years after Ryzen (but not available yet).
"Intel is done"?
"End of Intel"?
"No reason to buy Intel anymore"?
There's no reason why Intel wouldn't make a 16C competitor until 2021.They could have been true back then as well. I don't understand the excitement.
Also, people are drooling over a leak of 12 and 16C Ryzen like if this wasn't expected literally since AMD showed the chiplet idea.
Nothing here is shocking. Even if the specs are true, pricing will decide how these CPUs line up against Intel's.
And they are on the optimistic end of the scale…The final clocks and pricing is always the last step of the qualification process. People should know this by now. Since these facts didn't even exist back in December 2018, anyone who claimed to know them is either actually psychic, lying or delusional, and I don't know which one is worse…
There is nothing wrong in speculation, but what is wrong is calling your own speculation a "leak" of facts, facts that nobody can even know yet. And it doesn't matter if it turns out to be 70% accurate or 80% accurate, it's still fake news to attract traffic to their Youtube channels, blogs, webpages, or whatever.
I don't understand the aggressiveness between people here over this. Do all of you live so boring lives that the only place you can make a point of some kind is here?
Honestly, the bigger you dream, the harder it will be to face the truth. Let´s not get too excited because that only harms AMD itself.
Actually I'm hoping for those 5-15% promised IPC improvement.