Friday, May 3rd 2019
Possible Listings of AMD Ryzen 9 3800X, Ryzen 7 3700X, Ryzen 5 3600X Surface in Online Stores
Remember to bring your osmosis process to the table here, as a good deal of salt is detected present in this story's environment. Some online webstores from Vietnam and Turkey have started listing AMD's 3000 series CPUs based on the Zen 2 architecture. The present company stands at a Ryzen 9 3800X, Ryzen 7 3700X, and Ryzen 5 3600X, and the specs on these are... Incredible, to say the least.
The Ryzen 9 3800X is being listed with 32 threads, meaning a base 16-core processor. Clock speeds are being reported as 3.9 GHz base with up to 4.7 GHz Turbo on both a Turkish and Vietnamese etailer's webpages. The Turkish Store then stands alone in listing AMD's Ryzen 7 3700X CPU, which is reported as having 12 cores, 24 threads, and operating at an extremely impressive 4.2 GHz base and 5.0 GHz Boost clocks. Another listing by the same website, in the form of the Ryzen 5 3600X, details the processor as having 8 physical cores and running at 4.0 GHz base and 4.8 Boost clocks.
Sources:
TPU Forums @Thread starter R0H1T, nguyencongpc.vn, ebrarbilgisayar.com
The Ryzen 9 3800X is being listed with 32 threads, meaning a base 16-core processor. Clock speeds are being reported as 3.9 GHz base with up to 4.7 GHz Turbo on both a Turkish and Vietnamese etailer's webpages. The Turkish Store then stands alone in listing AMD's Ryzen 7 3700X CPU, which is reported as having 12 cores, 24 threads, and operating at an extremely impressive 4.2 GHz base and 5.0 GHz Boost clocks. Another listing by the same website, in the form of the Ryzen 5 3600X, details the processor as having 8 physical cores and running at 4.0 GHz base and 4.8 Boost clocks.
242 Comments on Possible Listings of AMD Ryzen 9 3800X, Ryzen 7 3700X, Ryzen 5 3600X Surface in Online Stores
What are you talking about? I'm not living in your country.
8600K can be clocked 1.2GHz higher than a 8400, 1.2GHz is a lot of MHz, you know.
2- I didn´t overpaid for anything, I got a good Samsung B-die 3200 CL14 Teamgroup ram and overclocked it to 4000mhz, you know, because z390 allows you to, unlike AM4.
3- Everywhere on youtube, go look for it. And who cares about ultra graphics on multiplayer? Black Ops 4, Quake Champions, Apex Legends, Overwatch, World War Z, etc I have more than 200fps with a 1080ti at 1080p on all of them, and not even using low settings on those. Do the research.
"Almost every"
>11% do it at a greater voltage than you specified.
And just so you know the operational cost of F-35 isn't nearly as much as the E-3.
Pilots are loving it it's also easier to maintain and plus just like the F4 in the past most parts are interchangeable between service branches and also Global units
But whatever. This is not a physics forum.
In few weeks all will be revealed. I'm sure you'll be happy with (and able to defend) whatever frequencies Zen2 comes up with. :-)
Besides, isn't "Ryzen 9" actually where current Threadripper stands?
Just look at how the 2700x is dropping frames while the 9900k is almost consistent. Now add in the higher clocks of Intel and you get over 20% difference. It's also the reason why 2700x is bottlenecking the high end rtx cards
Set of instructions ?
Pci express support
Ram channels and speeds
Voltage?
Pcie 4.0
Dual channel - no idea of JEDEC
Will vary with every chip like all other processors.
While IPC is absolutely very important for gaming up to a point, gaming performance (which in reality is GPU performance) is not a benchmark of the CPU. Even a 10% IPC gain will not yield a 10% improvement in gaming performance, unless the GPU is extremely bottlenecked. While most CPU bound tasks will scale "forever", rendering performance will not, they will scale until your GPU is no longer bottlenecked, and Intel is basically already there for current games, and Zen(1) is close but not quite there. Even with more modest improvements in Zen 2 than most of you guys expect, Zen 2 should still be able to come close enough in gaming to where it's probably good enough, and Intel will probably only retain a marginal symbolic lead (~2-3%).
Ive got all brand new hardware waiting to do a new build, have everythig except a videocard, but I just can't reward nvidia's avarice so I've held off...guess that's why I'm daydreaming about an APU that'd allow me to nix the videocard altogether
Other than that, I don't think you need TR4 for what you describe once we get DDR5. Ryzen 3000 already fits two CPU chiplets, just replace one with a GPU die and call it a day. If you want on-package HBM that's another matter.
1) Adored TV is far from being an AMD fanboy . He is an AMD fan indeed ( he has the right to ) BUT when it comes to his job he always makes very detailed and well though out analyses + he never hesitates to call out and criticize AMD on their bad products ( GPU's lately ) .
2) Adored TV doesn't make up numbers ! He is well respected within the PC hardware community ( he earned that respect ) as for example Hardware Unboxed gave him credits in their latest video and if that's not enough he got credits from AMD CEO herself ! Weird for someone who makes up numbers don't you think ? Yeah NO you like it or not he has real sources !
Should his words be taken as gospel ? Ofcourse NOT but fact is Adored TV always tries to verify and publish only the leaks who come from trusted sources , sometimes leaks are spot on sometimes they aren't .... saying Adored TV is an AMD fanboy or that he makes up numbers shows that you know nothing about the guy and his work so yeah......
Internet is full of AMD bots everywhere, because that´s trendy. People like to bash Intel and Nvidia, yet they still deliver the best products. Facts. Deal with it.
I will believe in AMD Zen 2 performance when I see it, as always. I don´t feed dumb rumours spreaded by the game guy that said Radeon VII would obliterate every nvidia card (AdoredTv). You believe in what you want. Let´s wait for the full release and then we can comment on the performance. He is indeed a fanboy. THe guy that said Zen+ would obliterate Intel in gaming because the IPC was up to 20% higher, and said Zen+ would reach 4,5ghz clocks. Short story, they reach 4,2ghz and that´s already a stretch, and IPC wasn´t that much improved. He also said Radeon VII would obliterate RTX 2080ti, but then he proceeds to delete the videos where he "preditcs" stuff.. ironic.
I don't agree with that if you need high end performance you buy Intel and Nvidia. Maybe if you need "the best of the best." and even then, at 4k, Ryzen works just as good as Intel. I sold my entire 9700k @5.2 with a ftw3 2080 for a Ryzen build with a Radeon VII. I also went custom loop after I legit considered a 2080 ti.. I don't just game, though, and Zen WILL BE the better buy. 2% slower or not. Once I can get zen 2, it's a wrap. If you don't consider that high end then I just don't know what to tell you..
This isn't Bulldozer at 4.8ghz..
Not everyone is playing 1080p and need the most FPS they can get. Everyone knows the CPU matters less when going up in resolution.. The only GPU I would get at this point in time from Nvidia is a 2080 ti. AMD as of now just plain offers a better experience with their software and drivers.. On top of that they get better and better. And this is coming from someone who had a Vega 64, Radeon VII, 1080 ti, and 2080.. All of those being the highest of the highest end, unless you specifically need Intel for a certain task..
Zen 2 may not match Intels performance but if you really think it's not going to close the gap enough to not make a damn difference then you're just delusional. Also, even if AMD remains 5% behind Intel in preformance, guess what? The only thing Intel will be good for is gaming. That's it. Of course there's a few things/programs that benefits from each platform but even at 5% behind Intel it would be stupid to buy a more expensive processor with less cores for a 5% boost in only gaming
Just like core duo was the best thing to ever happen in 2006, Ryzen 3000 is the best thing to ever happen in 2019 for the pc comunity as a whole.