Wednesday, May 27th 2020
![AMD](https://tpucdn.com/images/news/amd-v1723816949774.png)
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT and Ryzen 7 3800XT Benchmarks Surface
AMD's 3rd generation Ryzen "Matisse Refresh" processors surfaced on the Futuremark online database, as dug up by TUM_APISAK, where someone with access to them allegedly posted some performance numbers. Interestingly, the clock-speeds as read by the Futuremark SystemInfo module appear very different from what were previously reported. The 3800XT is shown featuring a 3.80 GHz nominal clock, boosting up to 4.70 GHz, while the 3900XT has a 3.90 GHz nominal clock, boosting up to the same 4.70 GHz as the 3800XT. APISAK reports that the 3800XT scores 25135 points in the FireStrike physics test.
A WCCFTech report presents screenshots of Cinebench R20 single-thread performance scores of the 3900XT, where it is shown beating the i9-10900K (in a single-threaded test). The 3800XT is within striking distance of the i9-10900K in this test, and beats the i7-10700KF. This single-threaded performance figure suggests that AMD's design focus with "Matisse Refresh" has been to shore up single-threaded and less-parallelized application performance, in other words, gaming performance.
Sources:
TUM_APISAK (Twitter), via VideoCardz, WCCFTech
A WCCFTech report presents screenshots of Cinebench R20 single-thread performance scores of the 3900XT, where it is shown beating the i9-10900K (in a single-threaded test). The 3800XT is within striking distance of the i9-10900K in this test, and beats the i7-10700KF. This single-threaded performance figure suggests that AMD's design focus with "Matisse Refresh" has been to shore up single-threaded and less-parallelized application performance, in other words, gaming performance.
87 Comments on AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT and Ryzen 7 3800XT Benchmarks Surface
Maybe you'll be right and the rumours are true, but you have no definite proof yet, which is what you were implying.
FWIW, he had talked about this Matisse refresh about 2 months ago, saying about exactly what we know today, excepting exact single-thread performance.
Edit to add: exact clocks and naming can be changed at the very last minute, though, so we shouldn't dwell on that too much.
I'm not trying to join your debate, I was only trying to point out that I consider Moore's Law is dead to be a very reliable source.
:rolleyes:
I often compare i to sport: there too fans speculate about transfers, results etc. For hardware enthusiast this is the closest analogue. Without real life betting of cource (god forbid someone starts gambling with money).
mlid told you very exact rumors,and when has a youtube rumor channel been wrong
But yeah when I hear marketing around 'gaming CPU' I get that same yucky feeling as marketing a 'Creator CPU'. Its BS. Performance is what it is.
Without removing too much performance viability from a future zen3 launch that's very effin close then zen 3 must be killer.