Wednesday, May 27th 2020

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT and Ryzen 7 3800XT Benchmarks Surface

Updated by
btarunr
 Updated: Discuss (87 Comments)
AMD's 3rd generation Ryzen "Matisse Refresh" processors surfaced on the Futuremark online database, as dug up by TUM_APISAK, where someone with access to them allegedly posted some performance numbers. Interestingly, the clock-speeds as read by the Futuremark SystemInfo module appear very different from what were previously reported. The 3800XT is shown featuring a 3.80 GHz nominal clock, boosting up to 4.70 GHz, while the 3900XT has a 3.90 GHz nominal clock, boosting up to the same 4.70 GHz as the 3800XT. APISAK reports that the 3800XT scores 25135 points in the FireStrike physics test.

A WCCFTech report presents screenshots of Cinebench R20 single-thread performance scores of the 3900XT, where it is shown beating the i9-10900K (in a single-threaded test). The 3800XT is within striking distance of the i9-10900K in this test, and beats the i7-10700KF. This single-threaded performance figure suggests that AMD's design focus with "Matisse Refresh" has been to shore up single-threaded and less-parallelized application performance, in other words, gaming performance.
Sources: TUM_APISAK (Twitter), via VideoCardz, WCCFTech

Related News

Add your own comment

87 Comments on AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT and Ryzen 7 3800XT Benchmarks Surface

#26
ratirt
cucker tarlsonyup.money doesn't grow on trees.it grows in your wallet.
Well lately it goes outta my wallet :P
Either way I'm still waiting for 4000 series desktops CPUs. It is still a good move. The price for these XT's is lower or what is it?
Posted on Reply
#28
BoboOOZ
ratirtWell lately it goes outta my wallet :p
Either way I'm still waiting for 4000 series desktops CPUs. It is still a good move. The price for these XT's is lower or what is it?
Rumors are the 4000 series pricing might be a bit saltier than we have been accustomed, so if this is the case these XT's will remain a decent alternative for the smaller wallets
Posted on Reply
#29
ratirt
BoboOOZRumors are the 4000 series pricing might be a bit saltier than we have been accustomed, so if this is the case these XT's will remain a decent alternative for the smaller wallets
Either way, I will wait for the 4000 series. I only hope it will be worth the wait (honestly i do believe it will be worth it) even if the price is slightly higher.
There's always good to have an alternative. AMD has thought about everything I guess.
Posted on Reply
#30
Chrispy_
If AMD says July-September, it means September 30th in Cupertino, so October 1st for most of the world, or at least late in the evening.
Posted on Reply
#31
Wilson
+100mhz just as expected. It's not zen2+ and not 7nm+ so there can't be any but minor changes
Posted on Reply
#32
EarthDog
cucker tarlsonI think they're just monetizing more mature 7nm.
If this means binning, yes.



If this is true, its about what I imagined... 100-200mhz bump. Enough to make news, otherwise, id rather wait for zen3/rocket lake.
Posted on Reply
#33
MAXLD
ARFPretty much. :)

www.pcgamesn.com/amd/zen-3-release-date-specs-performance-price
Might be optimistic. Plus, seen referenced around that it's expected that Zen3 models won't be launched all at the same, so some of these refreshed XT models might have a more extended market coverage than others. Still a lot of guessing out there at this point.
Posted on Reply
#34
Tomorrow
cucker tarlsonmax 4670mhz ? man,that's not that much over 3900x,even the early batches did that.
That's all-core. 3900X allcore was what? like 4300 something at best?
cucker tarlsonbut did they ? aren't they just new 2020 ryzens they're renaming ?
The 2000Mhz Infinity Fabric clock would disprove that. None of the current ones have been able to go over 1900MHz
cucker tarlsonis that confirmed ?
Nothing is confirmed. Ever. Not even the day we die. Even if it were confired what would that give you? They could postpone at the last second anyway.
Posted on Reply
#35
cucker tarlson
TomorrowThat's all-core. 3900X allcore was what? like 4300 something at best?

The 2000Mhz Infinity Fabric clock would disprove that. None of the current mones have been able to go over 1900M

Nothing is confirmed. Ever. Not even the day we die. Even if it were confired what would that give you? They could postpone at the last second anyway.
it says "max turbo core".are you 100% sure this is a stable,sustained all core full load turbo ?
Posted on Reply
#36
Tomorrow
cucker tarlsonit says "max turbo core".are you 100% sure this is a stable,sustained all core full load turbo ?
Not 100% sure but seems to be: wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-3000-matisse-refresh-ryzen-9-3900xt-ryzen-7-3800xt-ryzen-5-3600xt-cpu-benchmarks-rumor/
What's really interesting about these benchmarks is not the performance metrics themselves but rather the information listed by CPU-monkey which lists down the all-core boost clock speeds for these Matisse Refresh processors. According to the information, the Ryzen 9 3900XT has an all-core boost clock of up to 4.6 GHz across its 12 cores, the Ryzen 7 3800XT has an all-core boost clock of up to 4.5 GHz across its 8 cores and the Ryzen 5 3600XT has an all-core boost clock of 4.5 GHz too across its 6 cores.
Posted on Reply
#38
londiste
Maximum Turbo Core Clock lists highest frequency seen during the benchmark run.
Posted on Reply
#39
EarthDog
cucker tarlsonaren't they looking at the same data we are looking ? how they they be sure if we can't ?
lol, its wccftech...they aren't sure if they are coming or going. Grain of salt, yo.
Posted on Reply
#40
cucker tarlson
londisteMaximum Turbo Core Clock lists highest frequency seen during the benchmark run.
that's what it sounds."max turbo" - highest clock recorded.this is not sustained all core turbo by any means.
Posted on Reply
#41
Tomorrow
londisteMaximum Turbo Core Clock lists highest frequency seen during the benchmark run.
If so then why does it list only 4,6.... something if it should be 4,8?
Something does not add up here. Either these are early revisions that do not have the final 4,8Ghz boost or the 4,8Ghz reported max is false. I guess we will see in a few weeks when these are announced.
Posted on Reply
#42
cucker tarlson
TomorrowIf so then why does it list only 4,6.... something if it should be 4,8?
Something does not add up here. Either these are early revisions that do not have the final 4,8Ghz boost or the 4,8Ghz reported max is false. I guess we will see in a few weeks when these are announced.
Jesus Christ how do you know exactly what it should be ?
Posted on Reply
#46
cucker tarlson
Chrispy_Here, let me circle a few things for you.

:cool:
Posted on Reply
#47
Tomorrow
cucker tarlsonleaks are no more than rumors like every rumor.
Chrispy_Here, let me circle a few things for you.

We know many things only because of rumors. There were NEVER any official proof or announcements. Remember Nvidia's GPP?
The fact that it's a rumor does not mean 100% of rumors are always false. The same way they are not always 100% right.
Posted on Reply
#48
cucker tarlson
oh here we go with GPP in a ryzen thread :roll:
the hell are you even comparing ? this is a thread about the exact clocks.I'm not sure that amd are 100% sure themselves.
Posted on Reply
#49
Tomorrow
cucker tarlsonoh here we go with GPP in a ryzen thread :roll:
Just an example. I could bring others but what's the point? You don't even believe XT models exist. It's not my duty to convince you or others otherwise. You believe what you want to believe and i believe what i want.
Posted on Reply
#50
cucker tarlson
TomorrowJust an example. I could bring others but what's the point? You don't even believe XT models exist. It's not my duty to convince you or others otherwise. You believe what you want to believe and i believe what i want.
lol,where did I say that ?
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Aug 31st, 2024 10:46 EDT change timezone

Latest GPU Drivers

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts