Wednesday, May 27th 2020
![AMD](https://tpucdn.com/images/news/amd-v1723816949774.png)
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT and Ryzen 7 3800XT Benchmarks Surface
AMD's 3rd generation Ryzen "Matisse Refresh" processors surfaced on the Futuremark online database, as dug up by TUM_APISAK, where someone with access to them allegedly posted some performance numbers. Interestingly, the clock-speeds as read by the Futuremark SystemInfo module appear very different from what were previously reported. The 3800XT is shown featuring a 3.80 GHz nominal clock, boosting up to 4.70 GHz, while the 3900XT has a 3.90 GHz nominal clock, boosting up to the same 4.70 GHz as the 3800XT. APISAK reports that the 3800XT scores 25135 points in the FireStrike physics test.
A WCCFTech report presents screenshots of Cinebench R20 single-thread performance scores of the 3900XT, where it is shown beating the i9-10900K (in a single-threaded test). The 3800XT is within striking distance of the i9-10900K in this test, and beats the i7-10700KF. This single-threaded performance figure suggests that AMD's design focus with "Matisse Refresh" has been to shore up single-threaded and less-parallelized application performance, in other words, gaming performance.
Sources:
TUM_APISAK (Twitter), via VideoCardz, WCCFTech
A WCCFTech report presents screenshots of Cinebench R20 single-thread performance scores of the 3900XT, where it is shown beating the i9-10900K (in a single-threaded test). The 3800XT is within striking distance of the i9-10900K in this test, and beats the i7-10700KF. This single-threaded performance figure suggests that AMD's design focus with "Matisse Refresh" has been to shore up single-threaded and less-parallelized application performance, in other words, gaming performance.
87 Comments on AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT and Ryzen 7 3800XT Benchmarks Surface
Either way I'm still waiting for 4000 series desktops CPUs. It is still a good move. The price for these XT's is lower or what is it?
There's always good to have an alternative. AMD has thought about everything I guess.
If this is true, its about what I imagined... 100-200mhz bump. Enough to make news, otherwise, id rather wait for zen3/rocket lake.
Something does not add up here. Either these are early revisions that do not have the final 4,8Ghz boost or the 4,8Ghz reported max is false. I guess we will see in a few weeks when these are announced.
videocardz.com/newz/amd-ryzen-9-3900xt-to-boost-up-to-4-8-ghz
The fact that it's a rumor does not mean 100% of rumors are always false. The same way they are not always 100% right.
the hell are you even comparing ? this is a thread about the exact clocks.I'm not sure that amd are 100% sure themselves.