Monday, March 19th 2007
Racing games increase likeliness of destructive driving decisions in the real world
German researchers have recently conducted a study to determine the effects of games that promote risky decisions on real-world driving. These researchers took a batch of subjects (both women and men), and divided them into three groups. The first group played first person shooter games, such as Medal of Honor. The second group played more calming/family-oriented games, like Crash Bandicoot. The third group played hardcore racing games such as Need For Speed. All test subjects got to play these games on a Sony PlayStation 2 on a gigantic 72" television. The results of this experiment drew parallels between racing games that promoted violent/risky decisions in the game and violent/risky decisions in real life. First person shooters and family-oriented games did next to nothing to a subject's driving ability. However, racing games did a ton to a subject's actual driving.
Playing these video games does the following things to a person's driving:
If you'd like to read the full study, please do so here.
Source:
Reg Hardware
Playing these video games does the following things to a person's driving:
- Increases the accessibility of thoughts that are positively related to risk taking.
- Leads to enhanced arousal and excitement.
- Increases risk-taking behaviour in critical road traffic situations.
If you'd like to read the full study, please do so here.
65 Comments on Racing games increase likeliness of destructive driving decisions in the real world
I don't know about anyone else but I know for sure that my kids will learn to respect guns (so they won't hurt themselves), respect others (so they'll get into conflicts less often), and to drive safely.
while i do not disagree that GOOD PARENTING is the major factor in child development... take 90% of teenagers... and remove the parent influence... and you say these games have NO IMPACT on the kids? Nope. Cannot agree with you.
And, as we all know, in the modern family, parents and children spend ever less time together... and kids have less respect for adults (whether teachers, parents, or strangers)... which all adds up to the fact that the modern teenager (on average) is less likely to be WELL PARENTED (whatever that means!)
i mean im all for safe driving but seriously 3rd clutch e-brake riding riding e-brake 2nd clutch out gas....ya sooooo fun. tehe
That's too bad then. At 17, I play many racing/violent video games and I've been driving for about a year and a half and I haven't got into an accident nor have I recieved a ticket/citation of any kind. My parents taught me to drive safely, which I do for the most part (I do speed once in a while if someone gets on my nerves.. but who doesn't?). And I'm also fortunate to have a cousin who owns quite a few guns and taught me how to shoot them (which is great fun :D).
I don't mean to be racist or anything, but I think that the second part of your reply generally applies to Caucasian and black households; in Asian households (much like my own), as well as Hispanic, it tends to be very family-oriented. And although parents of all ethnicities teach their children to be respectful of adults, it, in my experience, is most visible in Asian household. Children from Korea, China, Japan, and Taiwan (there may be others as well) are taught from an early age to bow when greeting adults, to talk in a respectful manner, etc.
Do take note that my statements were generalized; they are in no way meant to be applicable to everyone. The statements are merely from what I've seen/experienced, as I am fortunate to have friends from a variety of different ethnicities.
As a side note: some of these games have an ESRB rating for a reason. I don't get why parents buy a M rated game (for those of you who do not live in the U.S., M rated games are for people 17 and above) and give it to a 9 year old. Games like Counter-Strike should not be given to younger children for both the well being of the child, as well as the other players who have to put up with the incessant screaming and whiny voice of the child. My guess is that these types of children are the only types included in the "studies" which makes the outcome seem horrible :shadedshu
I have to agree with your there... about cultural differences with family. I have spent a lot of time in asia and can say there is a WORLD difference between asian and "contemporary" european caucasian family behaviour. Also within Europe there are big differences, from country to country, from class to class, from family to family, from person to person.
But, remove the positive effects of good parenting, and imagine if it didnt exist. (Perhaps an extreme, but ever more common "to some degree" in some sectors of society). What then? Remember that these observations in the research study are not based on your family. Dont take things personally. Remember that this research is trying to identify issues that are relevant to general public policy. Not every family is like yours (or mine). Not everyone has an IQ > 100. In fact, more than 50% dont. LOL.
I do play twisted metal though
I improved my driving-in-the-crap-that-looks-like-snow skills...in a stick shift :).
And no you can't push-start an automatic, you need to rely on your friends to have jumper cables :p.
I was just ranting at the general stupidity of the population, as well as the stupidity of these so called "studies". :|
Wyoming = America's autobahn...
A Nissan Pathfinder gets 16 City and 23 Highway...