Tuesday, October 12th 2021

AMD Confirms "Zen 3" with 64 MB 3DV Cache for Q1-2022, "Zen 4" Later, PCIe Gen5 + DDR5

AMD today celebrated 5 Years of Ryzen, with a special video presentation by John Taylor, AMD Chief Marketing Officer, and Robert Hallock, Director of Technical Marketing. The company confirmed that its next Ryzen processors will come out only in Q1-2022. These processors will feature updated CPU core complex dies (CCDs) that combine the existing "Zen 3" microarchitecture with 64 MB of additional 3D Vertical Cache memory. AMD claims that this change improves performance by anywhere between 4% to 25% for games, amounting to the kind of performance uplifts you'd expect from a new processor generation.

AMD did not reveal whether the updated processors will be branded within the existing Ryzen 5000 series, or newer Ryzen 6000 series. If you remember, the "Zen+" microarchitecture enabled AMD to come up with a whole new generation, the Ryzen 2000 series, despite modest 4% IPC uplifts, albeit significant improvements to the boosting behavior, resulting in improved multi-threaded performance. What remains unclear is whether the updated "Zen 3" chips with 3DV Cache will herald a new platform, or whether these chips will be built on the existing Socket AM4 with DDR4 memory and PCI-Express Gen 4.
AMD's next truly next-generation Ryzen processor will come out within 2022, the company confirmed. Based on the new "Zen 4" microarchitecture, the company is targeting significant IPC uplifts, that will help it compete with Intel; but more importantly, introduce the new Socket AM5. An LGA package with 1,718 pins, AM5 will enable next-gen I/O. The "Zen 4" based next-gen Ryzen will indeed feature the combination of DDR5 memory and PCI-Express Gen 5, letting AMD level up to Intel on that front.

AMD's 2022 roadmap for desktop Ryzen processors looks quite similar to its 2020 roadmap. The company had initially refreshed its Ryzen 3000 series with a trio of Ryzen 3000XT SKUs that missed the mark of being viable stopgaps; but followed it up with the groundbreaking Ryzen 5000 "Zen 3" series toward the end of the year. 2021 will go down as an year without any new Ryzen processor generation.

Another aspect of Socket AM5 confirmed by AMD in the presentation was backwards compatibility of coolers with Socket AM4. You'll be able to retain your AM4-compatible coolers for AM5, without needing any adapters or upgrades to your coolers' retention modules.

As for a concrete response to Intel's Hybrid CPU core designs that the company will be pioneering on the desktop PC with "Alder Lake," AMD doesn't appear to be having a hybrid core design of its own, but hinted at the possibility that it is working on a new power-management solution built from the ground up, which will probably run a homogeneous set of CPU cores across very different performance/Watt bands, while retaining a consistent ISA. AMD has given this a rather uninteresting name—Power Management Framework.

Find the AMD presentation here:

Add your own comment

136 Comments on AMD Confirms "Zen 3" with 64 MB 3DV Cache for Q1-2022, "Zen 4" Later, PCIe Gen5 + DDR5

#103
Tomorrow
N3M3515So what's zen 3 with 3d cache for?, no smart person would buy it when zen 4 is around the corner...
Umm all AM4 owners who do not wish to change platform and RAM?
Posted on Reply
#104
windwhirl
N3M3515So what's zen 3 with 3d cache for?, no smart person would buy it when zen 4 is around the corner...
Zen4 will not work on AM4, so this Zen3+VCache will be the last product line for AM4. I'm considering getting one to upgrade my 3600 to whatever the equivalent for a 5900X + Vcache is named
Posted on Reply
#105
TheoneandonlyMrK
N3M3515So what's zen 3 with 3d cache for?, no smart person would buy it when zen 4 is around the corner...
I dunno ddr5 isn't going to be cheap for a year or two post release.
And some of us allowed for in step upgrades until a board swap is actually needed.
Posted on Reply
#106
lexluthermiester
N3M3515Q1 2022?, so when is ryzen 4 going to arrive? 2023? i smell trouble for AMD.
Then you should not trust your sense of smell. AMD will be fine.
N3M3515So what's zen 3 with 3d cache for?, no smart person would buy it when zen 4 is around the corner...
That's your opinion and not a very good one. Current Ryzen CPU's are a great purchase choice as they will provide excellent performance for at least the next 4 years and the new lot with the VCache will be even better.
Posted on Reply
#107
N3M3515
lexluthermiesterThat's your opinion and not a very good one. Current Ryzen CPU's are a great purchase choice as they will provide excellent performance for at least the next 4 years and the new lot with the VCache will be even better.
It's like you did not even know what i'm talking about. You did not understand.
Posted on Reply
#108
MarcusNumb
lexluthermiesterWell, technically, it has two. The Ryzen 5xxx CPU's and these new ones.
I know but upgrading 3600x to 5600x is not really worth it, imo. The 5800x is kinda too hot and 5900x o 5950x are absolutely way too much. BTW, it will be the last cpu for am4 so I'm looking foward to something worth upgrading then stay with them for the next 5 to 7 years before thinking about changing my rig.
Posted on Reply
#109
lexluthermiester
MarcusNumbI know but upgrading 3600x to 5600x is not really worth it, imo. The 5800x is kinda too hot
The 5800X is not that hot, even under load and while you're right, the 5600X is not a good upgrade from a 3600X, a 5800X is. With the VCache models coming it might be wise to see what they have to offer.
MarcusNumbBTW, it will be the last cpu for am4 so I'm looking foward to something worth upgrading then stay with them for the next 5 to 7 years before thinking about changing my rig.
True, the VCache models will be the last for socket AM4. That does not mean that AM4 is a bad choice. I just means that people getting into a rig based on it will have to accept that the upgrade path will be limited to faster CPU's in the that lineup. This dynamic has been the same since the days of the 40pin 8086.
Posted on Reply
#110
TheoneandonlyMrK
MarcusNumbI know but upgrading 3600x to 5600x is not really worth it, imo. The 5800x is kinda too hot and 5900x o 5950x are absolutely way too much. BTW, it will be the last cpu for am4 so I'm looking foward to something worth upgrading then stay with them for the next 5 to 7 years before thinking about changing my rig.
Great that's you covered!?.

Intel buyers take it for granted they'll update board every other week:p

Others bought the upgrade path like me 5990x or weva with 3dvcache is a decent upgrade from a 3800X, and before the reply I don't just Game either, it will be used here.


Then wait till ddr5 is actually better than top bin ddr4 and the right price, then update again.
Posted on Reply
#111
windwhirl
TheoneandonlyMrKGreat that's you covered!?.

Intel buyers take it for granted they'll update board every other week:p

Others bought the upgrade path like me 5990x or weva with 3dvcache is a decent upgrade from a 3800X, and before the reply I don't just Game either, it will be used here.


Then wait till ddr5 is actually better than top bin ddr4 and the right price, then update again.
Kinda planning the same: get a 5900X with Vcache to replace my current 3600 (non-X) and hold on to that system for a few years. I'll give it some use with WCG, a VM or two, and some gaming too, but it doesn't justify going for a 5950X so, I'm willing to go up to a 12core and call it a few years lol
Posted on Reply
#112
seth1911
yotano211If you dont like AMD that much, why are you using a A10 7870K for your processor.
AMD was a good Company in Old Days, but today its in my opinion totaly garbage :)
Posted on Reply
#113
TheoneandonlyMrK
seth1911AMD was a good Company in Old Days, but today its in my opinion totaly garbage :)
And the relevance of that answer to his question is?! Or the relevance of it to this thread is?!.

Hold up, Are you saying that Kaveri was the golden age?! I gotta big, belly laughing wtaf for that thought.
Posted on Reply
#114
lexluthermiester
seth1911but today its in my opinion totaly garbage
I can not agree with this AMD is knocking it out of the park in many area's of computing. Innovative products, solid product advancement, customer based support AND taking customer input onboard. AMD is a great company presently!
Posted on Reply
#115
InVasMani
TomorrowUmm all AM4 owners who do not wish to change platform and RAM?
This and even just the latter situation of not wanting to discard ram though due to frequency scaling, PCIE 5.0, pricing, and IMC performance I have a feeling Alder Lake will be more compelling for me personally. It's better suited for what I'm after.
Posted on Reply
#116
medi01
Please, AMD, do not do the "mix size cores" bazinga.

What the heck is the point in a world where H series CPU notebooks last 10+ hours???
Posted on Reply
#117
lexluthermiester
medi01Please, AMD, do not do the "mix size cores" bazinga.

What the heck is the point in a world where H series CPU notebooks last 10+ hours???
I think you're missing some context. This article & thread is about the desktop CPU line. They didn't focus on the mobile lineup.
Posted on Reply
#118
yotano211
seth1911AMD was a good Company in Old Days, but today its in my opinion totaly garbage :)
AMD was last good over 10yrs ago, today its a good company that has been turned around.
Why do you hate them, give a reason.
Posted on Reply
#119
Wirko
lexluthermiesterTrue, the VCache models will be the last for socket AM4. That does not mean that AM4 is a bad choice. I just means that people getting into a rig based on it will have to accept that the upgrade path will be limited to faster CPU's in the that lineup. This dynamic has been the same since the days of the 40pin 8086.
Even after Zen 4 launches, AMD probably won't be able to order as many 5 nm wafers as they would like, so supply will be tight. It's only logical that they keep improving whatever they have on 7 nm, for both desktops and servers. Some HPC customers might be very interested in Epyc Milan processors with three times the cache.
Posted on Reply
#120
MarcusNumb
lexluthermiesterThe 5800X is not that hot, even under load and while you're right, the 5600X is not a good upgrade from a 3600X, a 5800X is. With the VCache models coming it might be wise to see what they have to offer.

True, the VCache models will be the last for socket AM4. That does not mean that AM4 is a bad choice. I just means that people getting into a rig based on it will have to accept that the upgrade path will be limited to faster CPU's in the that lineup. This dynamic has been the same since the days of the 40pin 8086.
I'm not saying AMD is a bad choice, on the contrary my last gpu was the 5700xt, I totally support them to challenge Intel the way they are doing with Zen CPUs. On the gpu side, I upgraded to a 3070ti simply because I was able to sell my 5700xt for 600euros, after 1 year using it, and bought that 3070ti for 850euros. BTW, I'm gaming on 1080p so I'm really hoping for a 5700 version with V Cache so it will be perfect for my rig. If not then I'll have to consider the 5600x o 5800x with V Cache. Let's see how AMD surprises us.
Posted on Reply
#121
medi01
lexluthermiesterI think you're missing some context. This article & thread is about the desktop CPU line. They didn't focus on the mobile lineup.
Intel is about to introduce smaller cores for desktop.
If it doesn't make sense for mobile world, it makes even less sense in desktops.
Posted on Reply
#122
lexluthermiester
medi01Intel is about to introduce smaller cores for desktop.
If it doesn't make sense for mobile world, it makes even less sense in desktops.
We'll see. Some say it's a good idea. I personally see potential if they do it right. Time and testing will tell.
Posted on Reply
#123
seth1911
TheoneandonlyMrKAnd the relevance of that answer to his question is?! Or the relevance of it to this thread is?!.

Hold up, Are you saying that Kaveri was the golden age?! I gotta big, belly laughing wtaf for that thought.
Dont tell things that im not write and say. Ignored :laugh: :kookoo:
Posted on Reply
#124
Wirko
lexluthermiesterWe'll see. Some say it's a good idea. I personally see potential if they do it right. Time and testing will tell.
I agree. I expect four E cores to be able to process more instructions per seconds than one P core, possibly at lower power consumption, while taking up the same chip area.

And yes, the "time" component matters a lot here. Chances of Intel + MS having an (almost) flawless scheduler ready by 4th November 2021 are small.
Posted on Reply
#125
lexluthermiester
WirkoI expect four E cores to be able to process more instructions per seconds than one P core, possibly at lower power consumption, while taking up the same chip area.
This is why we need testing. I suspect that 4 e-cores will be able to do a bit better than 1 p-core, but only just. The rumor is that one e-core has the same performance as one old Core2 Conroe core, which would not be shabby. If this is true, then Intel might be on to something because a Core2Quad can Windows 11 smoothly all by itself. And with the new i5 you add 6 p-core on top of that and you have the potential for something really interesting. And with the i7 you double those 4 e-cores and add 8 p-cores, then you're talking potential for something game-changing, without breaking anyone's bank..
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jul 18th, 2024 19:28 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts