Thursday, January 27th 2022

G.SKILL Releases Extreme Low Latency DDR5-6400 CL32 Memory Kit

G.SKILL International Enterprise Co., Ltd., the world's leading manufacturer of extreme performance memory and gaming peripherals, is delighted to announce the launch of an extremely low-latency, high-speed DDR5-6400 CL32 32 GB (2x16 GB) memory kit under the Trident Z5 family memory series, designed for the latest 12th Gen Intel Core desktop processors and Intel Z690 chipset motherboards.

Dedicated to developing ever-faster memory modules, G.SKILL is launching an ultra-low latency DDR5-6400 CL32-39-39-102 memory kit at 1.40 V with 32 GB (2x16 GB) kit capacity. Equipped with exceptionally tight timings, this extreme memory specification represents the next step of the Trident Z5 family flagship performance. The screenshot below shows this memory kit validated on the Intel Core i7-12700K processor and ASUS ROG Maximus Z690 Hero motherboard. The DDR5-6400 CL32 32 GB (2x16 GB) memory kits under the Trident Z5 and Trident Z5 RGB series is available now via G.SKILL worldwide distribution partners.
Source: G.Skill
Add your own comment

36 Comments on G.SKILL Releases Extreme Low Latency DDR5-6400 CL32 Memory Kit

#26
ir_cow
WirkoAs you have reviewed a lot of DDR5 tech so far, do you have any information or indications that the Alder Lake memory controller actually does, or doesn't, make use of 32-bit DDR5 subchannels?
Hmmm. I haven't checked. I would say purely by a aida64 benchmark we could see if in fact 2x32 bus is actually used.

D4 4400 vs D5 4400.
Posted on Reply
#27
Wirko
TheinsanegamerNAre you suggesting that DDR5 designed to run at 1.4V will fail quickly because other DDR5 not designed for said voltage cant do it?
Yes - because chips aren't designed to run at 1.4V. This is Micron's documentation, and here's what it says:

In all probability SK Hynix and Samsung have the same maximum ratings, however, I can't find their documents publicly available.
Posted on Reply
#28
ir_cow
WirkoYes - because chips aren't designed to run at 1.4V. This is Micron's documentation, and here's what it says:

In all probability SK Hynix and Samsung have the same maximum ratings, however, I can't find their documents publicly available.
Oh yeah Micron IC will crap out at 1.4. The sticks I had didnt like 1.35v.

I've been told 1.4v for Hynix is fine. No idea the long term affect on the ICs are though. So don't take my word as law.
Posted on Reply
#29
Cutechri
By the time I make a new build in a few years, DDR5 will have (hopefully) matured enough that kits like these aren't considered "extreme low latency".
Posted on Reply
#30
Caring1
CutechriBy the time I make a new build in a few years, DDR5 will have (hopefully) matured enough that kits like these aren't considered "extreme low latency".
They're not now.
Extreme is the name, there should be a comma after that then "low latency"
Posted on Reply
#31
IdealPC
mrthanhnguyenMy dell 4800 is running at 6400c28 1t at 1.56v.
With this, no need to upgrade DDR5 then....Can you upload a CPU-Z of it?
Posted on Reply
#32
MxPhenom 216
ASIC Engineer
Wirko1.40 volts, that's not for the faint of heart (and neither for those who just want their RAM and CPU to survive for long).
There's nothing to worry about there
Posted on Reply
#33
marios15
Well it looks to me that it will take another 2 years, until datacenters/server adoption to absorb all the slow sticks and DDR5 to mass produce some decent or EXTREME frequencies.
DDR4 also took 2-3 years, from 2014-15 to 2017-18

Then again there's EUV around which might help a bit.
Posted on Reply
#34
bug
MxPhenom 216There's nothing to worry about there
If 27% more voltage doesn't worry you, what about power draw which is 61% higher?

I mean, ok, these are tested and come with a warranty so they won't burst into flames as soon as you power them on. But you can't run them casually either.
Posted on Reply
#35
MxPhenom 216
ASIC Engineer
bugIf 27% more voltage doesn't worry you, what about power draw which is 61% higher?

I mean, ok, these are tested and come with a warranty so they won't burst into flames as soon as you power them on. But you can't run them casually either.
lol, neither of those concern me whatsoever
Posted on Reply
#36
bug
MxPhenom 216lol, neither of those concern me whatsoever
Well then, I guess that settles it.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jan 8th, 2025 08:09 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts