Friday, February 4th 2022

Intel Arc "Alchemist" PCB Closeup Shows Up on Intel Graphics Discord

Intel put out a clear, close-up picture of its Arc "Alchemist" gaming graphics card engineering sample. This matches with a picture of the PCB rear shot that surfaced in a report by "Moore's Law is Dead." The picture reveals a PCB that's about 3/4th the length of the cooling solution, with the remainder of the cooler's length being used to directly vent airflow from the back.

The PCB reveals a rectangular pad for the GPU, which corresponds with that of the larger "Alchemist" GPU. This is surrounded by what look like eight GDDR6 memory pads for a 256-bit wide memory interface; at least 10 VRM phases of an unknown configuration; and a power input configuration that's made up of one each of 8-pin and 6-pin PCIe power connectors (capable of delivering 300 W including slot power). The PCB shows traces that connect the GPU to all 16 PCI-Express lanes of the PCIe finger. Display outputs include three full-size DisplayPorts and an HDMI. This particular variant of "Alchemist" is rumored to feature 512 execution units (4,096 unified shaders), and at least in SiSoft SANDRA, it allegedly outperforms the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti "Ampere."
Source: SquashBionic (Twitter)
Add your own comment

54 Comments on Intel Arc "Alchemist" PCB Closeup Shows Up on Intel Graphics Discord

#51
Quicks
Intel needed to release this last year already. Soon Nvidia and AMD will do a refresh and later this year release new cards.
The only thing that might help Intel then is good pricing and Intel already indicated it won't be cheap and this will fail.
Posted on Reply
#52
Kanan
Tech Enthusiast & Gamer
The 6500 XT is what I call, a pandemic card of mining times. It's kinda terrible but good enough, scares off the miners and can be produced easily in masses. The issue is it is simply not usable for Ultra settings and that's why it sucks in many reviews, as soon as 4 GB is used up the perf of it tanks hard. If you use it well it's good enough. The greater issue it then has is the fact you can not use ReLive with it.
Posted on Reply
#53
thelawnet
watzupkenTo me, it is a bad card as well. Performance wise, if the system that you are using it has a PCI-E 4.0 slot, then you will get the full performance of the card. And even if you get 100% of what you paid for, you are comparing a GPU that is 2 generations back, launched 6+ years ago with likely no driver optimisation by now. The improvement in performance is "meh" to say the least. And the difference in 2GB VRAM will also hurt performance at higher graphical settings. The story is worst when you compare both cards on the same system that only has PCI-E 3.0.
Objectively, the performance is decent if certain condition is met. But this is a card that I will only recommend if someone must buy a GPU because their existing GPU is dead or dying. For users for GTX 1060 6GB and RX 570/ 580, they should just continue to use their card until the opportunity presents itself to buy a better GPU at their target price, or until their GPU bites the dust. From an attractiveness standpoint, the RX 6500 series is a fail.
It serves one market well, and that's people building new Alder Lake PCs who don't want to spend $500+ on a GPU.

It's not at all a solution for people wanting to upgrade ageing cards, it's a card which goes in your new build an lets you play AAA games at acceptable quality levels.

I don't think it's exactly a question of whether it is an objectively good or bad product. Objectively it's a bad product, in that it should be faster, have more PCIE lanes, encoding, etc. But OTOH, it's better than the available alternatives, so if you need a GPU for your new PC it's the only choice in many cases (e.g., if you don't want to spend more than $250, and used is not an option for you).
Posted on Reply
#54
Patriot
AssimilatorI'm incredibly impressed that you're able to determine this from an image.


And that's where the unicorn comes in.
It's not terribly hard to tell the difference between a mechanical mockup and an ES. Clearly not a final product with the jtag on it. Looks like they took off a backplate and then covered up some identifying chips. If it was just a thermal test unit it would be wired up with thermistors. In its current configuration it has every indication that it is an ES meant to test gpu functions, but I guess you have not worked through prototype hardware stages before. :)
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 20th, 2024 17:36 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts