Wednesday, March 30th 2022

Intel Teases Arc Desktop Graphics Card

After today's mobile Arc GPU reveal, Intel has also teased its first desktop Arc graphics card in a YouTube video that gives us a first sneak peek of its first desktop graphics card since the late 1990's. Although it's not clear which card Intel is showing off in the video, as the card simply says Intel ARC Limited Edition on the back, it's clear that Intel has gone with a simpler design than those early concepts the company was showing off a couple of years ago. Based on the animated render, we'd hazard a guess that this is a higher-end model, as it appears to have eight memory ICs, as well as a somewhat elaborate cooling system with four heatpipes.

Two fans can also be seen in the video, although the mounting appears somewhat unusual compared to most graphics cards. The back of the card is covered, but it's not obvious if this is a functional rear cover or just for looks. The card also has three DisplayPort and one HDMI outputs. However, what can't be seen in the video, is any kind of power connectors on the card, although it's unlikely that Intel has managed to make a graphics card that doesn't require an external power-input, at least not based on what is known about Intel's upcoming Arc GPUs. The video ends with a message of the new cards coming in the summer of 2022. Based on the video, it seems like we should expect Intel branded retail cards, albeit in a limited production run and most likely only in select markets. You can watch the video after the break.
Source: Intel
Add your own comment

80 Comments on Intel Teases Arc Desktop Graphics Card

#76
GoldenX
R-T-BHasn't the rumormill been grinding nonstop about XeSS or whatever?


With all due respect, you've never gamed on an Intel driver IGP for long if you think AMD is bad...

And no, not talking about performance...
It's almost unusable, I had to endure with only an HD 5500 for over a year. But at least Youtube worked...
Posted on Reply
#77
R-T-B
GoldenXIt's almost unusable, I had to endure with only an HD 5500 for over a year. But at least Youtube worked...
Yeah the performance is what it is (awful), but I was more refering to the games that outright don't run or have severe unfixable graphics glitches on intel drivers. And there are (or were at least) plenty.

I remember trying to run Silent Hunter 3 on an IGP from a 6600k. Man, it never worked right, geometry errors everywhere... and the horsepower should've been there.
Posted on Reply
#78
Unregistered
R-T-BYeah the performance is what it is (awful), but I was more refering to the games that outright don't run or have severe unfixable graphics glitches on intel drivers. And there are (or were at least) plenty.

I remember trying to run Silent Hunter 3 on an IGP from a 6600k. Man, it never worked right, geometry errors everywhere... and the horsepower should've been there.
Does the 12th gen IGP still suck balls? never even tried mine.
#79
R-T-B
TiggerDoes the 12th gen IGP still suck balls? never even tried mine.
Probably, but don't honestly know. I think I remember reading they reused the 6600k IGP an absurd amount of times, so it might even BE that.
Posted on Reply
#80
GoldenX
TiggerDoes the 12th gen IGP still suck balls? never even tried mine.
Yes.
OpenGL support is nonexistent, like AMD, but at least it doesn't crash the whole system.
Vulkan is "fine", as broken and slow as AMD's, plus the small size of the IGP.
DirectX is also severely lacking, like R-T-B says. And Intel promises day 1 support that never comes.

We basically have a monopoly of drivers right now, and it's only caused by lack of care from 2 of the 3 options we have. Money goes to the 12900KS and 5800X3D...

The worst part is that Intel's hardware, some compute decisions aside, is GREAT. They only suck because of bad driver support.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Oct 7th, 2024 11:36 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts