Thursday, July 7th 2022

AMD is Investigating a Potential 450 Gb Data Breach

RansomHouse, a newly established group aimed at monetizing stolen data, claims to own more than 450 Gb of data coming from AMD. The RansomHouse group is structured as the middleman and makes sure that hackers and victims negotiate to get the funds to hackers and data back to victims. It is claimed that the leaked AMD data contains network files, system information, and AMD passwords. This could be a very dangerous data breach, as inter-company passwords are used to access confidential files and personal information. The group notes that they own 450 Gb or gigabits of data, which translates into 56.25 GB or gigabytes of stolen data. We are not yet sure if the Gb notation is misspelled. It is claimed that AMD's poor security practices like using "password" passwords lead to the data breach, and no special ransomware software was used.

Tom's Hardware reached out to AMD for a statement, and got the following response:
AMD Representative for Tom's HardwareAMD is aware of a bad actor claiming to be in possession of stolen data from AMD. An investigation is currently underway.
Source: Tom's Hardware
Add your own comment

46 Comments on AMD is Investigating a Potential 450 Gb Data Breach

#26
Unregistered
TiggerApparently the best type of passwords are just 3 random words, treescooterracoon

www.ncsc.gov.uk/blog-post/the-logic-behind-three-random-words
Interesting read. Especially now with multiple accounts having random words require to remember can really help, maybe having random words in a different language (e.g. Chinese words written in Latin).
Thanks for sharing
#27
Chrispy_
Xex360Interesting read. Especially now with multiple accounts having random words require to remember can really help, maybe having random words in a different language (e.g. Chinese words written in Latin).
Thanks for sharing
correct horse battery staple

Posted on Reply
#28
Kohl Baas
zlobbyThat would be peak irony! Or, you know what's even better? If they were hacked via some backdoor!
Oh, wait! There are no backdoors! ;)
No. Being AMD the peak irony would to be hacked through one of the Intel ones through an Intel machine.
Posted on Reply
#29
zlobby
Kohl BaasNo. Being AMD the peak irony would to be hacked through one of the Intel ones through an Intel machine.
I agree. :D
Posted on Reply
#31
MarsM4N
bugSo... basically anything in German will do?
That's basically unhackable then. :laugh: Guess these has to be the 3 longest German words:

Donaudampfschifffahrtselektrizitätenhauptbetriebswerkbauunterbeamtengesellschaft
Grundstücksverkehrsgenehmigungszuständigkeitsübertragungsverordnung
Donaudampfschifffahrtsgesellschaftskapitänswitwe


To be fair, most of these words are invented by buerocrats, not used by the average joe. Funny part is the buerocrats also create a shortened version of these words for their law books, and everyone then has to google what it actually means. F.e. "Telekommunikationsüberwachungsverordnung" = § 1 "TKÜV"
Posted on Reply
#32
bug
MarsM4NThat's basically unhackable then. :laugh: Guess these has to be the 3 longest German words:

Donaudampfschifffahrtselektrizitätenhauptbetriebswerkbauunterbeamtengesellschaft
Grundstücksverkehrsgenehmigungszuständigkeitsübertragungsverordnung
Donaudampfschifffahrtsgesellschaftskapitänswitwe


To be fair, most of these words are invented by buerocrats, not used by the average joe. Funny part is the buerocrats also create a shortened version of these words for their law books, and everyone then has to google what it actually means. F.e. "Telekommunikationsüberwachungsverordnung" = § 1 "TKÜV"
I'm just gonna leave this here: www.leselern-paten.org/die-hottentottenstottertrottelmutter/
Posted on Reply
#34
DeathtoGnomes
MarsM4NThat's basically unhackable then. :laugh: Guess these has to be the 3 longest German words:

Donaudampfschifffahrtselektrizitätenhauptbetriebswerkbauunterbeamtengesellschaft
Grundstücksverkehrsgenehmigungszuständigkeitsübertragungsverordnung
Donaudampfschifffahrtsgesellschaftskapitänswitwe


To be fair, most of these words are invented by buerocrats, not used by the average joe. Funny part is the buerocrats also create a shortened version of these words for their law books, and everyone then has to google what it actually means. F.e. "Telekommunikationsüberwachungsverordnung" = § 1 "TKÜV"
Well there is supercalifragilisticexpialidocious to consider too.
Posted on Reply
#35
Vayra86
Chrispy_correct horse battery staple

Yeah I always use that one, its the safest :pimp:
Posted on Reply
#36
Valantar
Vayra86Yeah I always use that one, its the safest :pimp:
I wonder how many password brute-force scripts include that as a guess just in case :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#37
bug
ValantarI wonder how many password brute-force scripts include that as a guess just in case :laugh:
Not that one, in particular, but I wouldn't be surprised of they used 2-6 word combos. You can still foil that with capitalization, l33t 5p34k and some punctuation, without making the password hard to remember.
Posted on Reply
#38
Valantar
bugNot that one, in particular, but I wouldn't be surprised of they used 2-6 word combos. You can still foil that with capitalization, l33t 5p34k and some punctuation, without making the password hard to remember.
I meant that one in particular - after all, if there's one lesson to learn in these kinds of things it's to always make the stupid guesses.

You're probably right about the word combos, but even three words is a LOT of guesses. I've read that a native English speaker will know ~40 000 words (but use about half with some frequency), while a dictionary can contain 300 000 entries (though not all of those are "words" in a strict sense. So let's go with common words - two is 20 000^2, or 400 million guesses. That's not really secure, just a tad more than a six-letter password with only the 26 English non-capitals. But three? 8 trillion combinations. Six? 6.4*10^24 combinations. That's... 6 400 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 possible combinations. That sounds like a "maybe before the heat death of the universe" type of situation. (And we're still talking all lower case!) So I doubt any brute-force scripts include six-word combinations, unless they're using massively reduced word lists.
Posted on Reply
#39
Unregistered
ValantarI meant that one in particular - after all, if there's one lesson to learn in these kinds of things it's to always make the stupid guesses.

You're probably right about the word combos, but even three words is a LOT of guesses. I've read that a native English speaker will know ~40 000 words (but use about half with some frequency), while a dictionary can contain 300 000 entries (though not all of those are "words" in a strict sense. So let's go with common words - two is 20 000^2, or 400 million guesses. That's not really secure, just a tad more than a six-letter password with only the 26 English non-capitals. But three? 8 trillion combinations. Six? 6.4*10^24 combinations. That's... 6 400 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 possible combinations. That sounds like a "maybe before the heat death of the universe" type of situation. (And we're still talking all lower case!) So I doubt any brute-force scripts include six-word combinations, unless they're using massively reduced word lists.
So 3 random words is pretty secure, can see why it is recommended.
#40
bug
ValantarI meant that one in particular - after all, if there's one lesson to learn in these kinds of things it's to always make the stupid guesses.

You're probably right about the word combos, but even three words is a LOT of guesses. I've read that a native English speaker will know ~40 000 words (but use about half with some frequency), while a dictionary can contain 300 000 entries (though not all of those are "words" in a strict sense. So let's go with common words - two is 20 000^2, or 400 million guesses. That's not really secure, just a tad more than a six-letter password with only the 26 English non-capitals. But three? 8 trillion combinations. Six? 6.4*10^24 combinations. That's... 6 400 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 possible combinations. That sounds like a "maybe before the heat death of the universe" type of situation. (And we're still talking all lower case!) So I doubt any brute-force scripts include six-word combinations, unless they're using massively reduced word lists.
I wanted to write 2-4 initially. But then I felt a little more generous ;)

In a nutshell, if I were to write such a tool, I would add at least some heuristics, looking for low-hanging fruits, in addition to brute forcing.
Posted on Reply
#41
zlobby
bugI wanted to write 2-4 initially. But then I felt a little more generous ;)

In a nutshell, if I were to write such a tool, I would add at least some heuristics, looking for low-hanging fruits, in addition to brute forcing.
Assuming zero prior knowledge of your target, and your target follows good security practices, you'd need to go quantum.
Posted on Reply
#42
Athlonite
TiggerSo 3 random words is pretty secure, can see why it is recommended.
7 is better

It would take a computer about

4 quintillion years

to crack your password

so good luck hackin me wifi pword
Posted on Reply
#43
Valantar
Athloniteso good luck hackin me wifi pword
That's exactly seven words ;)
Posted on Reply
#44
Why_Me
zlobbyNobody seen Suomi or Hungarian?
Finnish and Estonian always seems easy on the ears. Probably harder than h3ll to learn but it still sounds pretty cool imo. JRR Tolkien was a big fan of that language.

Posted on Reply
#45
Athlonite
ValantarThat's exactly seven words ;)
Oh yeah so it is but it's not the seven I use though
Posted on Reply
#46
Valantar
AthloniteOh yeah so it is but it's not the seven I use though
That's what you're saying now, sure ;)
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 22nd, 2024 03:59 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts