Thursday, August 25th 2022
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and Ryzen 5 7600X Cinebench R23 Single-Thread Numbers See it Trade Blows with the Competition
Alleged Cinebench R23 single-threaded benchmark numbers of the upcoming Ryzen 7 7700X and Ryzen 5 7600X "Zen 4" processors, leaked to the web by Greymon55, and tabulated by VideoCardz, show the two chips to be matching Intel's 12th and 13th Gen Core processors. The 7700X 8-core/16-thread processor is shown scoring anywhere between 2000 to 2099 points (denoted as 20xx), while the 7600X does anywhere between 1900 to 1999 points (19xx). This would see the two easily match/beat the 12th Gen Core "Alder Lake" P-cores, with the i9-12900K scoring 2000 points, and the i5-12600K getting 1920 points.
Numbers for the unreleased 13th Gen Core "Raptor Lake" put Intel at an advantage, with the i9-13900K allegedly scoring 2290 points, and the i5-13600K allegedly 1967 points, but what's important is that the single-thread performance, and application performance of less-parallelized workloads, such as games, could be highly competitive for "Zen 4" against Intel.
Sources:
Greymon55 (Twitter), VideoCardz, harukaze5719 (Twitter)
Numbers for the unreleased 13th Gen Core "Raptor Lake" put Intel at an advantage, with the i9-13900K allegedly scoring 2290 points, and the i5-13600K allegedly 1967 points, but what's important is that the single-thread performance, and application performance of less-parallelized workloads, such as games, could be highly competitive for "Zen 4" against Intel.
48 Comments on AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and Ryzen 5 7600X Cinebench R23 Single-Thread Numbers See it Trade Blows with the Competition
Btw. how far in advance do tech sites get review samples shipped? If leaks are correct, reviewers gonna be busy the next 3 weeks.
The original leak stated 29th August as the official announcement of Zen4 from AMD. On the 13th of September, reviewers will be allowed to give their two cents regarding this new lineup and just 2 days later, the CPUs will be unveiled to the public.
- Announcement : 29th August, 8PM ET
- Press embargo : 13th September, 9AM ET
- Official Launch : 15th September, 9AM ET
Source: MSI Accidentally Confirms the Launch Date for AMD Zen4 along with its X670E MotherboardsAMD and Nvidia new GPUs will have nothing less than twice the performance of the current gen.. so don't tell me that CPU doesn't make a difference in 4K. I really believe it will be relevant from the near future
Motherboards have already shipped. CPUs I'm not sure.
Also 16 threads matching 24 threads, not bad
I'd expect techpowerup, of all places, to know that before writing something silly like this
Or if you live anywhere near a micro center, wait a year, and they will clearance the whole lineup in prep for zen 4 refresh
Raptor lake will fill the mid range gap but AM5 is a long lived platform so if I had to build a new rig in 2-4 months I would probably go AM5 7700XT then 7900X3D -> zen5 ... just because there's an upgrade path there.
13400 probably MSRP = $200 + MSI B660M-A PRO WIFI DDR4 = $140 + 32 GB DDR4-4000 CL18 = $120 - > SUM = $460
7600X probably MSRP = $250 + MSI PRO X670-P WIFI =$315 + 32BG DDR5-6000 CL30 = $310 -> SUM = $875
This translates into Zen4 being DOA no matter how AMD prices Zen4. And I'd be really surprised if 6700X MSPR gets sub $250 price tag given the fact that TSMC is rising prices.
Lets stop with the assumptions and just be patient and wait and see.
So no declaring winners when Zen4 reviews go live because I think people will be surprised with Raptor Lake's gaming performance (already they start to realize the MT performance difference, hence the comments regarding what pricing AMD must follow...)
Ryzen 9 5950X CPU-Z MC: 11906
Core i9-13900K CPU-Z MC: 16630 Intel's Core i9-13900K Raptor Lake CPU outperforms Intel Core i9-12900K and Ryzen 9 5950X CPUs in new Benchmark - TechnoSports
40% faster!It wouldn't surprise me, TBH. I am waiting for a flop from AMD, which will come at some point.
B boards and DDR5 5600 turns that $875 into $570 which is alot more manageable (still a little high but far from DOA)Yeah I didn't even factor in the board + the 13400 being a non-k CPU (intel intentionally gimped the ram overclocking for non-k cpus) there's no way he's hitting 4000 on that ram, there's like a 60-70% chance he doesn't even hit 3600mhz (12400 was really bad on ram overclocking)
That pretty much ends the debate for anyone using software that takes advantage AVX512.