Friday, September 2nd 2022
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X Tested in Cinebench R23
A Cinebench R23 picture of AMD's recently announce Ryzen 9 7950X CPU having been put through its paces have appeared online via a post on Baidu, which has been taken down since the picture was posted. However, courtesy of @harukaze5719 it lives on, on Twitter and gives us a first glimpse into the Cinebench R23 performance of the upcoming CPU. The CPU is said to have been air cooled, so it's possible that we'll see even higher benchmark numbers with better cooling, so take these numbers with a pinch of sodium chloride, just to be on the safe side. The test system was also using Windows 10, so there's the potential of some extra performance by changing to Windows 11 here as well.
In the single score test, the Ryzen 9 7950X scores 2,205 points, which is in line with Cinebench R23 leaks for Intel's upcoming Core i9-13900K CPU, if a smidgen slower. The multi-core score is obviously not going to compete with Intel's Core i9-13900K due to the overall lower core count, but at 29,649, but it's ahead of the Core i9-12900K by a decent margin. It'll be interesting to see how AMD positions the 7000-series of CPUs, as although it seems like the company has done a good job in improving the overall performance compared to the 5000-series, it's not quite enough to take the performance crown this time around, if these early benchmark leaks from both sides are anything to go by.
Update 10:27 UTC: A new picture hjas appeared where the CPU has been kitted out with better cooling at the multi-core score has jumped from 29,649 to 36,256, which makes it competitive with the Core i9-13900K scores that have leaked in the past.
Sources:
@harukaze5719, @henry41224
In the single score test, the Ryzen 9 7950X scores 2,205 points, which is in line with Cinebench R23 leaks for Intel's upcoming Core i9-13900K CPU, if a smidgen slower. The multi-core score is obviously not going to compete with Intel's Core i9-13900K due to the overall lower core count, but at 29,649, but it's ahead of the Core i9-12900K by a decent margin. It'll be interesting to see how AMD positions the 7000-series of CPUs, as although it seems like the company has done a good job in improving the overall performance compared to the 5000-series, it's not quite enough to take the performance crown this time around, if these early benchmark leaks from both sides are anything to go by.
Update 10:27 UTC: A new picture hjas appeared where the CPU has been kitted out with better cooling at the multi-core score has jumped from 29,649 to 36,256, which makes it competitive with the Core i9-13900K scores that have leaked in the past.
83 Comments on AMD Ryzen 9 7950X Tested in Cinebench R23
Core i7-5960X, 8/16 @4.3, Cinebench R23, MT 9794, ST 953
I can upgrade to a 5-6000$ 22 cores Xeon for about 200€, getting the same multithreading performance of a Threadripper 1950X or a Ryzen 9 3900XT. The AMD chips though have higher ST performance, especially the R9 because of the frequency.
Still, if someone don't mind waiting a couple minutes more for a rendering and don't have much money, can be a great pick.
Anyway, I was also an FX owner and it's impressive to see how far AMD has gone in the CPU market.
Not going well!!! Send help!!!
I can wait for reviews. Not sure who else can without bashing AMD from now until then.
¿huh?, window 11 is slower than win10 in everything except if you're using that trash alder lake hybrid crap
I'm still impressed enough about the 7600x beating the 12900K in multi threaded - this could be one of those rare times both sides put out improvements at the same timeNot according to the leaks so far
The only benchmark that showed different was CPU-Z, and AMD actually showed CPU-Z in their slides, demonstrating that it got no gains from their changes while other programs did (1% for CPU-Z, 40% for winzip)
So lets be happy that we have some kickass processors AND gpus to look forward to! How often are we fortunate enough to have this scenario play out? A gamer/tech junkie/enthusiasts dream come true, to have whats purported to be amazing procs and gpus releasing nearly simultaneously?
Benchmarks. Sigh, benchmarks are fun to play around with and they can give you a good idea of what to expect. But ultimately its little more than a conversation piece/advertisement at this point in the game. Particularly coming from a drippy source. So lighten up and take it for what is. Nothing more than something to TALK about.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems crazy that a simple cooling swap could add ~30% increase to the benchmark.
So Intel from process disadvantage that has now with Raptor vs Zen4 in 2022, will go to process advantage in 2024 and 2025.
What I am most looking forward to is competitive pricing and technology between AMD and Intel and in the process hope that they don't deliver complete dogshit while trying to 1up each other.
But in my experience Winzip also very often corrupt archives when using open cl.
But as far as roadmaps go, since new leadership, Intel actually accelerated advanced process adoption, skipping "Intel 3" adoption entirely.
Even if Intel is one process behind of what roadmaps promise, it will still have advantage vs AMD:
Intel currently has the i3 12100 but AMD didn't need to release an entry level CPU this generation because the higher tiers were selling as quick as they could make them.
The Ryzen 5 5600 competes against the i5 12400F which isn't entry level.
That’s even higher score than reported yesterday and much higher than initial reports. The flagship Ryzen7000 CPU has now been spotted reaching 38,984 points thanks to water cooling. The leaker, using engineering sample (since no SKU name is listed but AMD OPN core), does not provide any further details.
Extracted from videocards site today, still ES sample in use but more inline with expectations.
Still not worth much, it's not released, verified or tested by W1zzard or other reliable sources.
www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/amd-ryzen-9-7950x-tested-in-cinebench-r23.298486/post-4826820