Thursday, March 9th 2023
AMD Ryzen 7045HX3D "Dragon Range" with 3DV Cache Should Technically be Possible
There are two distinct developments in the client processor space for AMD—first, its Ryzen 7000X3D desktop processors have managed to retain gaming performance competitiveness against Intel's fastest 13th Gen Core "Raptor Lake" processors; and second, that its Ryzen 7045HX "Dragon Range" mobile processors are picking up interest in the enthusiast-segment notebook community, where its advanced 5 nm + 6 nm process is dealing damage to 13th Gen Core mobile processors in performance/Watt, and gaming performance. Can AMD dial things up a notch? Technically, yes.
It should technically be possible for AMD to build "Dragon Range" multi-chip modules using "Zen 4" + 3D Vertical Cache CCDs (CPU complex dies), much in the same way it did for the desktop product stack. Such a processor would either have one CCD with the 3DV cache for a CPU core-count of up to 8-core/16-thread; or a contraption similar to the desktop 7950X3D, wherein one of the CCDs has 3DV cache, while the other is a regular "Zen 4" CCD, for core-counts of up to 16-core/32-thread. But will AMD build such chips? A lot would depend on the volumes of L3Ds (the 6 nm dies with the 64 MB 3D Vertical cache memory that operates at 2.5 TB/s), the production of CCDs with 3DV cache; and whether AMD is able to achieve the right performance/Watt numbers against Intel's fastest 8P+16E "Raptor Lake" mobile processors.In an interview with Korean tech publication Quasar Zone, AMD client and business development manager Eddy Chang stated that the company would "plan products based on market conditions," in a response to a question on whether AMD could extend 3DV cache to other product segments, such as cheaper Ryzen 5 desktop SKUs, or mobile processors. The only mobile processor AMD has in its stack to which it can easily integrate 3DV cache would have to be "Dragon Range," since the engineering effort would be limited to adding a 3DV cache-equipped CCD, and optimizing the chip's power-management.
Sources:
Quasar Zone, harukaze5719 (Twitter)
It should technically be possible for AMD to build "Dragon Range" multi-chip modules using "Zen 4" + 3D Vertical Cache CCDs (CPU complex dies), much in the same way it did for the desktop product stack. Such a processor would either have one CCD with the 3DV cache for a CPU core-count of up to 8-core/16-thread; or a contraption similar to the desktop 7950X3D, wherein one of the CCDs has 3DV cache, while the other is a regular "Zen 4" CCD, for core-counts of up to 16-core/32-thread. But will AMD build such chips? A lot would depend on the volumes of L3Ds (the 6 nm dies with the 64 MB 3D Vertical cache memory that operates at 2.5 TB/s), the production of CCDs with 3DV cache; and whether AMD is able to achieve the right performance/Watt numbers against Intel's fastest 8P+16E "Raptor Lake" mobile processors.In an interview with Korean tech publication Quasar Zone, AMD client and business development manager Eddy Chang stated that the company would "plan products based on market conditions," in a response to a question on whether AMD could extend 3DV cache to other product segments, such as cheaper Ryzen 5 desktop SKUs, or mobile processors. The only mobile processor AMD has in its stack to which it can easily integrate 3DV cache would have to be "Dragon Range," since the engineering effort would be limited to adding a 3DV cache-equipped CCD, and optimizing the chip's power-management.
31 Comments on AMD Ryzen 7045HX3D "Dragon Range" with 3DV Cache Should Technically be Possible
In saying that, Intel's 13th Gen mobile offerings are far from energy-sippers - there's a vocal majority of reviewers complaining about significant runtime reductions in this wave of 13th Gen laptop review. So it's not like AMD has to worry about runtime competition from Intel at least...
Zen4 3DVC works at a slightly lower frequency, and also has lower heat, while giving more gaming performance. This is basically the recipe for a gold medal in laptop gaming chip design.
Make it happen, AMD.
Now seriously, seems pretty straight forward as dragon range is just the same desktop cpu's but on a laptop, why would they go for that? The extra cache seems to barely provide any benefit on regular applications (let alone the ones that would run on a laptop) and would require a extra power to run. Maybe big chungus gaming laptops but are we really still doing that!?
The kind of laptop that uses a desktop chips is always on the big side, i'm all for making 3d cache standard but in a laptop seems like a detriment to being somewhat portable with some battery life. I see many problems, from the price premium of a 16 core desktop chip on a laptop (and 16 cores on a laptop for gaming?) and the price of a configuration that also combines that with a high end nvidia gpu, to the sheer size of such a monstrosity. But hey, people are free spend their money however they like
Also, don't the sockets for Zen 5 include separate voltage input for cache and core?