Monday, March 27th 2023
EU's New Right to Repair Directive Requires 10 Year Component Availability
A new directive from the EU wants its member states to implement new right to repair laws that require hardware manufacturers to repair products up to 10 years from the date of purchase. This also means that devices under warranty will have to be repaired, rather than replaced, to reduce the waste that the faulty devices would most likely have ended up producing. The key part of the new directive is device manufacturers now have to offer the right to repair long after warranties have expired, with some product categories being forced to offer parts for repair up to 10 years after the purchase date, if the customer demands it.
We're not just talking about home appliances here, but also phones and tablets, as well as other consumer electronics, as well as commercial computers. That said, some devices will only be required to have a five year supply of parts and components, which makes sense for some more affordable products. The directive also calls for a union wide "repair matchmaking platform" that should make it easier for consumers to get their products repaired. However, the Right to Repair coalition calls the new directive a missed opportunity, as it wants the right to repair to be universal, but it says that the new directive is at least a step in the right direction. The biggest concern about the new directive is that it doesn't mention anything about the cost of the repairs, so we could end up seeing price gouging on spare parts and repair costs, which would make the new directive moot, as it could be cheaper getting a new product rather than having it repaired.
Sources:
The European Commission (PDF), via The Register, the Right to Repair coalition
We're not just talking about home appliances here, but also phones and tablets, as well as other consumer electronics, as well as commercial computers. That said, some devices will only be required to have a five year supply of parts and components, which makes sense for some more affordable products. The directive also calls for a union wide "repair matchmaking platform" that should make it easier for consumers to get their products repaired. However, the Right to Repair coalition calls the new directive a missed opportunity, as it wants the right to repair to be universal, but it says that the new directive is at least a step in the right direction. The biggest concern about the new directive is that it doesn't mention anything about the cost of the repairs, so we could end up seeing price gouging on spare parts and repair costs, which would make the new directive moot, as it could be cheaper getting a new product rather than having it repaired.
89 Comments on EU's New Right to Repair Directive Requires 10 Year Component Availability
What you describe is a libertarian ideal, in that customers should be free to make good and bad choices and are required to educate themselves. The problem with that is the end result of that is nothing is trustworthy and everything has to be researched if you take it too far. People who don't do their research don't deserve to get shafted, there are fields in which we all are uneducated and you should be required to do research for everything you buy. It's fine to apply that logic on a limited basis but overall there should be certain guarantees and protections that the government applies to the market to ensure that people aren't constantly getting shafted.
Repairable devices is one of those things that would not happen without government intervention. Listing a product's part cost does nothing if the company doesn't sell those parts to others or stops producing them quickly, both of which are their best interest and it encourages sales. It also doesn't help the user repair the device either, of which companies have been making it increasingly difficult to do. That the government doesn't go after these companies for using those stickers in the first place enables them to get away with screwing over customers. It's not surprising in the US though, given that the government has been extremely deferential to big businesses for a long time. The FDA can't even properly alert the public about Romaine lettuce or Salmonella outbreaks anymore because they are often months late and the damage is already done.
It's going to be better to just get the accidental drop/... insurance and just do that every year for the same model or newest device :cool:
I bet you in the end it's worst to change without a good reason to do so, especially if you're happy with the old device.
That said, modern gaming LCDs can consume around 60w and OLEDs up to 100w depending on what's being displayed so we have almost come full circle.
You see a similar phenomenon in the US vehicle market, where larger tonnage vehicles with more relaxed fuel economy standards have continued to become more and more popular.
People are always pushing at the boarder at what is affordable to them, thus far a lot of technological advances have only enabled people to get more gluttonous with their purchases.
The linked review is calibrated to 200 nits but stock it'll consume around 58w.
The new LG 27" OLED can reach 90w when displaying a 90% white screen.
These are very high end monitors and extreme cases but it's definitely possible even at 27 inches.
LCDs are definitely more efficient but a lot of higher end monitors are trading that efficiency for pixel transition times.
That 24 inch CRT you used to have, used about 75-95 W/h
The new OLED 48 inch comes in at.... the same amount of power usage :)
We saved half power per inch, so now the smallest 'regular TV' is double sized.
But let's keep living the dream! Meanwhile, the footprint per person isn't going down, its going up as wealth goes up. Because we don't have one TV in the house anymore. We've got one in several rooms. Plus a PC. Plus...
More interesting numbers
www.rtings.com/tv/learn/led-oled-power-consumption-and-electricity-cost See above for what really happens wrt power usage.
One could also say 'try finding a 24 inch OLED and get back to me' ;)
Now, of course you'll say "But at least now you have the right to choose" and you'd technically be correct, but the end result is that sites are now cumbersome and obtuse. Would it not have been easier to mandate "opt-out by default" and a less intrusive opt-in? What we have now is madness.
I expect this will be more of the same: sounds like a good idea, but it's not so good in practice.
Yes, in theory it sounds good, like a step in the right direction, but in the end when it's in effect if there are so many omissions and loopholes (be they intentional or unintentional), does it even matter? It's a world I often dream of, but doubt we'll see soon. Have 2-3 models of something instead of 20-30, have as much parts of it be interchangeable, have common standards for common parts etc. Alas, I know that manufacturers have strong lobbies and won't like it if you buy stuff less often. It's omissions and loopholes like this that make me wonder if the Comission is trolling us or it's just incompetent. You know damn well that Apple is a slippery one, why would you give them room to do what they do best and circumvent your rules? Imagine a world where a common smartphone battery standard is a thing and you can easily open the back of your 5-year-old phone and replace the dying battery in a minute. Imagine if the bootloader was mandated to be factory unlocked and you could flash the latest OS of your choice on it. Sounds good, no? xda-developers.com could have a solution. I hope they do at least. I love Louis. He may be cynical at times, but seems like he genuinely cares and always has some good points. For those too lazy to watch the video, his points are:
- no mention of parts being available to third-party repair shops (interesting, since I saw spare parts mentioned in the document);
- no mention of making schematics needed for repair purposes available to third-party repair shops;
- no mention of making service software needed to pair parts together available to third-party repair shops (why the hell is this even a thing, Apple?!);
- having to register in a special database and maintain standard contact forms would complicate life for repair guys; I'm on the fence on this one. On one hand, some users are experts and can often can do a better job than most shops. On the other, others are outright idiots that just break stuff.
The first thing that comes to my mind: if someone wants to claim the warranty on a non-working video card, for example, how do you know if he didn't just brick it by flashing a wrong BIOS without going all forensics detective on it? It could be a legit defective one, but it could also be user error. Most people I talk to on the matter complain about having a pile of old phones in their drawer collecting dust.
But when put in context next to keeping coal-based power plants up and running and their environmental impact, switching to a new phone or TV less often feels like a drop in the ocean. Hey now, keep your filthy mitts off muh little space heater! My room gets quite chilly during the winter! :)
---
My thoughts on the whole thing: first off, I wholly agree with @Vayra86 that what needs to change is most importantly people's mindset. For too long people have been conditioned that they need to buy the new thing instead of repairing the old thing and keeping it running. They live with the idea that repair is not sustainable and a new model is the way. Truly, artificially raising the cost of repair and the magic of marketing have zombified them to the point that they don't want to know about repair.
Man is an imperfect beast and the big players take full advantage of his imperfections... Oh, too difficult to deal with repairing it? Get the new model! Jack has the new model, does it not make you feel bad? Get the new model! Or better yet, buy this now, wait another six months, get the even newer model and rub it all in Jack's face. Think about how good that will feel. Just get the new model!!! Yeesss, that's a good boy...
So is this new legislation the way to go? I really can't be certain. I can only hope that it's one small step in the right direction.
The masses like being told what to like. If sustainable suddenly became the new sexy, people would start caring. But right now they don't. You can try to educate them, but pretty soon they stop listening. No, what we need to do is figure out how to make sustainable the new sexy.
Call me crazy, but I think that with the way the average Joe thinks and acts, a paid campaign where celebrities and influencers (God, I hate that word) start upselling people on the new repairable hotness would prove to be more efficient than EU legislation. I... I think I can see it...
"Hey errybody issyaboy Pnannyslayer69, back wit anutha one of dem block rockin repairable phones. This one be crazy, y'all, you can have the screen replaced for $25 a pop! I dun replaced my screen twice this last week alone cause my hands be always sweaty from holdin' dat paper, mayne! And I dun did it all by myself with just this itty-bitty screwdriver that came included with it! Now that's crazy, son!"
Might just work...
There is a quote from Henry Ford, "you can have a model T on any colour as long as it's black". Of course if everyone had one model of car and one colour, and a durable one, why would anyone ever want to buy a new car. So car companies facing decreasing sales, started to make new models every x years, new colours, etc... so you have to get the newest thing, a shiniest thing then your neighbour, etc...
This is how our economy works, it collapses if you deviate from it.
Nobody wants people to hold on to their car or smartphone, not the politician, not the companies, not the employees of those companies. Losing battle.
I woul agree if i could send the card, my custom TIM and thermal pads and an authorized person at the manufacturers service would swap them for free and reapply the warranty sticker. None are an option ATM.
super glue
a million screws of hundred different sizes
weird screws that you need to buy a special tool
warranty stickers
super fragile parts so they almost dare you to not brake it
etc...
and even the new trend that they want to stop you from importing parts (Louis talked about this)
The only scenario I see where I could agree with you is if by some miracle you present a document that's written and signed by a certified technician stating that the repair was done by you under his supervision and he automatically assumes responsibility for the repair. You have lots of other options before tearing into it, like:
1. Undervolting
2. Undervolting with underclocking
3. Setting a custom fan curve
4. Giving it a bit more general airflow
5. Returning the card (within 14 days, assuming it was bought digitally, you know how it goes)
6. Doing some research and not buying crap See now we're thinking alike :) Aaah, yes, the glue, so much glue. Thanks, manufacturers, I hate it!