Thursday, June 6th 2024

MSI Shows New Range of QD-OLED Gaming Monitors at Computex

MSI has become something of a major player in the gaming monitor market and the company had a range of new OLED and QD-OLED models on display at Computex 2024. Let's start with the biggest buzzword model, the MEG 321URX QD-OLED which MSI claims is the world's first true AI gaming monitor. The so-called AI engine is supposed to help gamers lose less with features like AI Skysight which scans the game's mini map in real time for threats and then points them out to the player. There's also the ability to display certain stats on the monitor's "SpectrumBar" which is an RGB light strip below the monitor. Looking at the actual specs we find a next-gen 31.5-inch, 4K QD-OLED display panel with 240 Hz refresh rate and a 0.03 ms grey to grey response time. There was no mention of any HDR certification for this model.

Connectivity wise many of you will not be happy to see DisplayPort 1.4 as the main input, although it also has two HDMI 2.1 ports, a USB Type-C with DP Alt-mode support that also offers 98 Watts of USB PD charging, one USB 2.0 Type-B input, two USB 2.0 Type-A outputs and a headphone jack. KVM support is part of the package and MSI states it has improved the cooling by using a graphene film and a custom heatsink so the QD-OLED panel should run cooler than competing products. The MEG 321URX finally comes with OLED Care 2.0 which MSI claims will "significantly reduce the chances of OLED screen burn-in" according to the information provided at the show. According to TFTCentral, it will cost US$1700, but there's no availability date as yet.
Next up we have the MPG 341CQPX QD-OLED which is a 34.18-inch display with 3440 x 1440 resolution and an 1800R curvature. The refresh rate and response time remains the same as on the MEG 321URX. The connectivity remains identical as well. The MPG 341CQPX is VESA DisplayHDR True Black 400 and ClearMR 13000 certified. It should be available in the US sometimes in July, followed by Europe in August and it will retail for US$1000/£950/€1100.

This is followed by the MAG 321UP, which is another 31.5-inch QD-OLED monitor which MSI says features a next-gen QD-OLED panel. However, it only gets a 165 Hz refresh rate, but retains the fast response time of the previous two models. MSI has trimmed the "fat" on this model, which means no KVM support and only 15 Watt USB PD charging support. It also gets the lower VESA ClearMR 9000 certifications, but it too is DisplayHDR True Black 400 certified. It should be available sometime in June for US$900.

Finally we have the MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2, which is a smaller 26.5-inch 1440p model with a 240 Hz refresh rate. It gets the same connectivity and features as the MAG 321UP, with the only difference being that it has VESA ClearMR 13000 certification. It should be available this month for US$800.
Add your own comment

39 Comments on MSI Shows New Range of QD-OLED Gaming Monitors at Computex

#26
TheLostSwede
News Editor
OnasiYeah, artificial segmentation, yay. That USB port is on the cheaper model as well, drop the PD if you must, but firmware updates, IMO, aren’t a big ask from a 900 dollar monitor. I was wrong when I said 150, by the way, sorry, it’s just 50 bucks. But they seem to really want to upsell. Not sure what the point of the base SKU even is then.

Edit: Oh, I am wrong again. Must be tired. There are no USB ports on the base model. Okay then, making a bit more sense then. Still, seems like going for the upsell makes it a no brainer here. Not like if you wanted to spend 900 you wouldn’t find another 50 dollars for QOL features.

Oh, and since there is no difference in the VRR range and we are talking OLED, there is absolutely no functional difference between basic Adaptive Sync and FreeSync. Another marketing trick, having another box checked, it seems.
The base model still has a Type-C input.
Posted on Reply
#27
Onasi
TheLostSwedeThe base model still has a Type-C input.
Sure, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they decided to artificially limit it to serving as DP Alt only and it is incapable of accepting data for firmware updates. It would be incredibly stupid, but I am not surprised by anything these days.
Posted on Reply
#28
VIPERSRT
TheLostSwedeI guess you've never had a fan start to fail? Getting into a lot of monitors is nigh on impossible, as they're clipped, not screwed together.
These companies will always put the smallest fan possible inside as well.
Fans are a bad idea in anything you can't easily access them in.
On top of that, most companies tend to use non standard fan connectors, so they're not easily replaceable either.
A heatpipe and a large enough heatsink should be good enough, but have you looked at how most OLED displays are made? A tiny little square box for the electronics and a thin, flimsy panel hanging around it. No wonder it's hard to cool.
Also, that's a picture of a TV, not a monitor, the two are not the same.
The company decisions made cooling solution more difficult and nightmare . Who will care for thin monitor design? just make it standard size as LED LCD monitor that provides enough space for heatsink. For fan they can fix it under mesh cover which make it easier to clean and replace as old HDD in laptop but they stupidly waste money on AI to find a solution to detect static IMAGE to reduce brightness when the led become hot!!
Posted on Reply
#29
Pumper
Why must all the gaming monitors have ugly stands?
Posted on Reply
#30
Vayra86
OnasiYeah, artificial segmentation, yay. That USB port is on the cheaper model as well, drop the PD if you must, but firmware updates, IMO, aren’t a big ask from a 900 dollar monitor. I was wrong when I said 150, by the way, sorry, it’s just 50 bucks. But they seem to really want to upsell. Not sure what the point of the base SKU even is then.

Edit: Oh, I am wrong again. Must be tired. There are no USB ports on the base model. Okay then, making a bit more sense then. Still, seems like going for the upsell makes it a no brainer here. Not like if you wanted to spend 900 you wouldn’t find another 50 dollars for QOL features.

Oh, and since there is no difference in the VRR range and we are talking OLED, there is absolutely no functional difference between basic Adaptive Sync and FreeSync. Another marketing trick, having another box checked, it seems.
You fell for MSI's trick. Seeing those three monitors its obvious everyone picks the middle option, and MSI is happy because you paid 1k for an OLED panel.
Elsewhere we see 1k and frown upon it being expensive. Here its 'the best pick'. :) Marketing. The AI option is just there to guide you to the 949,- product, much like the 899, one. I mean you have to be a special kind of noob to pay 700 bucks to get your health bar flashing in your face all the time. Imagine playing Diablo with that, constant random flashing usually way too late as your health has regenerated already. Its not only pointless, it would annoy your socks off.
Posted on Reply
#31
Bagerklestyne
Tim from MUB confirmed after a chat with MSI while was at computex that even the base model (that doesn't get software updates) will be able to get them as long as you don't have the first batch of the model that came out.

Second and subsequent batches have a chip in them that will facilitate firmware updates, how exactly was unclear but Tim said other monitors have used dp for the data ingress so who knows.
Posted on Reply
#32
Chomiq
PumperWhy must all the gaming monitors have ugly stands?
Monitor arms are a thing you know. They solve all the stupid stands problems.
Posted on Reply
#33
TheLostSwede
News Editor
BagerklestyneTim from MUB confirmed after a chat with MSI while was at computex that even the base model (that doesn't get software updates) will be able to get them as long as you don't have the first batch of the model that came out.

Second and subsequent batches have a chip in them that will facilitate firmware updates, how exactly was unclear but Tim said other monitors have used dp for the data ingress so who knows.
As I pointed out, it still has a USB-C input, so it might go via it.
Posted on Reply
#34
Bagerklestyne
TheLostSwedeAs I pointed out, it still has a USB-C input, so it might go via it.
What was your take/feel on the difference between the Vesa clear certifications (13k vs 9k) ? perceptible or not ?
Posted on Reply
#35
Onasi
BagerklestyneWhat was your take/feel on the difference between the Vesa clear certifications (13k vs 9k) ? perceptible or not ?
So far the numbers on clearmr seems like the definition of “pulled out at random”. They have several OLEDs and IPS screens of the same refresh get the same category, which is just patently nonsense. The fact that they also decided not to account for VRR is also worrying since it means that overdrive performance on lower refresh is not tested and, for OLED specifically, VRR artifacts are also omitted.
All in all, it seems like a meme of a cert and DEFINITELY asking whether it results in perceivable difference when you can provably take two monitors with the same certification and they OBJECTIVELY will perform differently is, frankly, pointless.

Tl:dr Nothing had changed since this article.
Posted on Reply
#36
Bagerklestyne
OnasiAll in all, it seems like a meme of a cert and DEFINITELY asking whether it results in perceivable difference when you can provably take two monitors with the same certification and they OBJECTIVELY will perform differently is, frankly, pointless.

Tl:dr Nothing had changed since this article.
Given I am looking at a monitor in this class, it's not pointless. It might not be obvious or it could be absolutely blatant. Writing it off without questioning it at all is, frankly, pointless.
Posted on Reply
#37
TheLostSwede
News Editor
BagerklestyneWhat was your take/feel on the difference between the Vesa clear certifications (13k vs 9k) ? perceptible or not ?
Sorry, I wasn't actually at the show, so I haven't seen either display.
Posted on Reply
#38
mxthunder
BagerklestyneTim from MUB confirmed after a chat with MSI while was at computex that even the base model (that doesn't get software updates) will be able to get them as long as you don't have the first batch of the model that came out.

Second and subsequent batches have a chip in them that will facilitate firmware updates, how exactly was unclear but Tim said other monitors have used dp for the data ingress so who knows.
I thought this was super interesting as well. If you could only find either of the models in stock.
Im starting to second guess wanting one after hearing some more horror stories of burn in.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 13:36 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts