Tuesday, August 13th 2024

AMD Readies Ryzen 5 5500X3D Socket AM4 Processor with 3D V-Cache

If you're on the Socket AM4 platform, AMD is never gonna give you up, never gonna let you down, never gonna run around and desert you; never gonna make you cry, never gonna say goodbye, never gonna tell a lie, and hurt you. The company is reportedly giving finishing touches to a firecracker of a sub-$200 chip for price-conscious gamers, the Ryzen 5 5500X3D. That's right, AMD is bringing 3D V-cache technology to the mid-range, with a new 6-core processor based on the "Zen 3" microarchitecture, but enjoying the gaming performance boost from 96 MB of L3 cache on tap.

AMD already has a 6-core X3D Socket AM4 chip, the Ryzen 5 5600X3D, which joined the product stack a couple of years after AMD's original Ryzen 7 5800X3D took the gaming PC processor scene by storm, matching the then swanky new Core i9-12900K "Alder Lake" despite being based on an older-generation "Zen 3" architecture. Not much else is known about the 5500X3D, except that it could have a lower clock speed than the 5600X3D. Back in November 2023, when news of the 5700X3D first hit the scene, the 5500X3D was rumored to be a 6-core/12-thread chip with 3.00 GHz base frequency and 4.00 GHz maximum boost, compared to the 3.30 GHz base and 4.40 GHz boost frequency of the 5600X3D. Given that AMD launched the 5600X3D at $230, AMD could target a sub-$200 price point to wow gamers on AM4, such as $199.
Why is AMD continuing to launch Socket AM4 chips well into the mid-2020s? We're no strangers to love, you know the rules and so do I—the new Socket AM5 lacks backwards-compatibility with DDR4, and as such AMD would be abandoning a large value-conscious desktop market to Intel, which supports DDR4 on even its 14th Gen Core processors. While AMD can't backport Zen 4 to AM4, it can do the next best thing—expand Zen 3 with 3D V-cache to more market segments, and bring Zen 4 kind of gaming performance to those segments. This could probably also have something to do with AMD's wafer-supply agreement with GlobalFoundries, which provides the 12 nm client I/O die for these "new" chips.
Sources: Harukaze5719 (Twitter), chi11eddog (Twitter)
Add your own comment

114 Comments on AMD Readies Ryzen 5 5500X3D Socket AM4 Processor with 3D V-Cache

#76
AsRock
TPU addict
thesmokingmanMy kid bought the 7800X3D for $200 at MC not long ago.
Sadly our nearest is 200 miles away or i would of got my 2 AMD systems from there too.
Posted on Reply
#77
Vayra86
Minus InfinityTo deflect attention from Zen 5 fiasco.
LOL. Its a fiasco now already. Okay. What was Intel's recent fail then? A nuclear world war?
Posted on Reply
#78
Assimilator
I wonder how long AMD will continue to sabotage Zen 5's success with Zen 4.
Posted on Reply
#79
Palindrome
I'm wondering what the CCD configuration on this will look like. Cause if it has its cores scattered across two CCDs like the regular 5500, and then has its clock speed reduces as well, I'm not sure tacking on some cache will do all that much to help it? I could be wrong though.
Posted on Reply
#80
thesmokingman
Vayra86LOL. Its a fiasco now already. Okay. What was Intel's recent fail then? A nuclear world war?
Give him a break man, he's trying hard to... hey guys look over here!
Posted on Reply
#81
sLowEnd
PalindromeI'm wondering what the CCD configuration on this will look like. Cause if it has its cores scattered across two CCDs like the regular 5500, and then has its clock speed reduces as well, I'm not sure tacking on some cache will do all that much to help it? I could be wrong though.
It'd probably be just a 5600X3D with lower clocks
Posted on Reply
#82
Guwapo77
SL2Good for you.

Did you have a question for me, or you just wanted to tell me lol
You asked why can't they be the 5600X3D...it can't as there is already one. LoL
Panther_SeraphinNope it was a full X3D chip, just lower binned/lower top speeds vs the 5800x3d exactly the same case as the 5500x3d will be in relation to the 5600x3d

Why? At best case itll perform as well as a 58/78/9800x3d in games and worse case itll perform markedly worse when your having to go across the Infinity Fabric to access the 2nd cache die. Remember how the 7950X3D was barely any better at gaming than the 7800X3D even though it had double the cores AND a benefit in slightly higher top speeds?

AMD would need a rethink/redesign of the IMC on the I/O die and how chips can access caches across each others die or a marked increase in vcache per die to make it worthwhile going across the Infinity Fabric even with the extra latency.
This video is what I remembered from months ago and why I stated the 5700X3D wasn't worth it. However, if you don't have access to the cheaper 5600X3D and you can only buy the 5700X3D/5800X3D then the 5700X3D is worth it. Watching this video again, the performance isn't all that different all about the same; however the 5600X3D is the best bang for the buck. The big difference between 5600X3D and 5700X3d was the 300Mhz increased clocks on the 5600X3D.


Why? Because I want to upgrade my 5950X to a 5950X3D. It would be one hell of an upgrade for me. AM4 is still one helluva system. AM6 is what I'll be waiting for to do my next build.
Lew ZealandWhat? That makes no sense.

The 5700X3D is a 5800X3D that runs at 4100 MHz instead of 4500 MHz for 2/3 the price or less. It is in no way less "X3D" than the 5600X3D, 5800X3D, 7800X3D, 7900X3D, and 7950X3D.
Ultimately you're right. My memory failed me as 5700X3D is a true X3D chip just clocked lower than the 5600X3D and finding itself losing to the lower model in multiple games. 5600X3D > 5700X3D.
Posted on Reply
#83
Lew Zealand
Guwapo77Ultimately you're right. My memory failed me as 5700X3D is a true X3D chip just clocked lower than the 5600X3D and finding itself losing to the lower model in multiple games. 5600X3D > 5700X3D.
Based on reviews elsewhere, the 5600X3D is about 6% slower than the 5800X3D with the 5700X3D being 4% slower, so overall it's:

5700X3D > 5600X3D

by a hair. In real world use they're very similar with the 3D VCache doing most of the heavy lifting and the occasional game will favor one over the other.

But the real advantage of the 5700X3D is availability as few people live close enough to a Microcenter to get the 5600X3D.
Posted on Reply
#84
Guwapo77
Lew ZealandBased on reviews elsewhere, the 5600X3D is about 6% slower than the 5800X3D with the 5700X3D being 4% slower, so overall it's:

5700X3D > 5600X3D

by a hair. In real world use they're very similar with the 3D VCache doing most of the heavy lifting and the occasional game will favor one over the other.

But the real advantage of the 5700X3D is availability as few people live close enough to a Microcenter to get the 5600X3D.
I'm sure I linked a video from hardware unboxed. 5600X3D > 5700X3D. I already mentioned availability. Its all good bro, I got the 5600X3D in my son's rig and its well worth the lunch money.
Posted on Reply
#85
Lew Zealand
Guwapo77I'm sure I linked a video from hardware unboxed. 5600X3D > 5700X3D. I already mentioned availability. Its all good bro, I got the 5600X3D in my son's rig and its well worth the lunch money.
Lol, I was looking at TechSpot/Hardware Unboxed's individual 5600X3D and 5700X3D reviews instead of the head to head in your video and they found a slight difference the opposite way there as their original 5600X3D review used a different mix of games. Which means they're the same speed depending on what game you're playing as in each case the difference was 1.5% or less. Buy whichever's cheapest and available.
Posted on Reply
#86
amd64skater
This time next year they will announce the 5400X3D. Please just make a 12or16 core X3D AM4 and just get it over with.:banghead::respect:
Posted on Reply
#87
kapone32
If AM4 is anything to go by getting a high end AM5 X670E board seems like a really wise investment. If only their APUs were cheaper. They would own DIY.
Posted on Reply
#88
Unregistered
Lew ZealandBased on reviews elsewhere, the 5600X3D is about 6% slower than the 5800X3D with the 5700X3D being 4% slower, so overall it's:

5700X3D > 5600X3D

by a hair. In real world use they're very similar with the 3D VCache doing most of the heavy lifting and the occasional game will favor one over the other.

But the real advantage of the 5700X3D is availability as few people live close enough to a Microcenter to get the 5600X3D.
It's not really much of a choice anymore, Microcenter hasn't had the 5600X3D in stock for a while now (at least not in my area).
They're selling the 5700X3D for $190 though, which is still over $100 less than I paid for a 5800X3D on sale.

In all honestly I'd suggest the 5700X3D anyway for most, as an EOL upgrade for an aging rig you may as well get the extra cores.
Posted on Edit | Reply
#89
wNotyarD
Double-ClickIn all honestly I'd suggest the 5700X3D anyway, as an EOL upgrade for an aging rig you may as well get the extra cores.
In before AMD trolls everyone and releases the 5900X3D and/or 5950X3D in 2025.
Posted on Reply
#90
Guwapo77
Double-ClickIt's not really much of a choice anymore, Microcenter hasn't had the 5600X3D in stock for a while now (at least not in my area).
They're selling the 5700X3D for $190 though, which is still over $100 less than I paid for a 5800X3D on sale.

In all honestly I'd suggest the 5700X3D anyway for most, as an EOL upgrade for an aging rig you may as well get the extra cores.
Well damn...if that's the case my entire point is rather pointless. I didn't know they stopped selling them. 5600X3D < 5700X3D < 5800X3D
Lew ZealandLol, I was looking at TechSpot/Hardware Unboxed's individual 5600X3D and 5700X3D reviews instead of the head to head in your video and they found a slight difference the opposite way there as their original 5600X3D review used a different mix of games. Which means they're the same speed depending on what game you're playing as in each case the difference was 1.5% or less. Buy whichever's cheapest and available.
Double-Click just stated they are sold out anyways... You win. 5700X3D > 5800X3D

Microcenter 5700X3D - $189.99
Newegg 5800X3D - $349.99 (Amazon selling used for $329.99)

5700X3D is clearly the people champ as of 16 Aug 2024.
Posted on Reply
#91
RJARRRPCGP
erockerPeople know AMD is sandbagging performance due to lousy competition. This series is barely a step above the previous series. Maybe things will pick-up once they start selling X3D chips and x8xx series motherboards but I don't expect much.
That sounds like 2012's Intel, LOL.
SL2The difference is that LGA1700 is still Intel's latest socket, but given the FUD surrounding Rocket Rusty Raptor lake with all its economy cores, I wonder if they dare retiring Alder anytime soon.
Actually, I have been thinking about making an Intel build that is Alder Lake. Probably putting in an Arc A770 to top if off!
kondaminsomething tells me software will need to be optimised for the longer pipeline and the wider execution engine
Sounds like Pentium 4 all over again, LOL.
Posted on Reply
#92
Marcus L
AMD have lost a sale from me, I would have bought the 5600x3D if it wasn't only restricted to US/best buy or was it MC? as the 5800x3D was too much compared to a regular 5600x or even 5700x, so I bought a 5700x which cost me £149 which I suspect the 5500x3D will likely be there or there abouts, but there's no way I am dropping another 150 now after having already spent that on the 5700x to bring my total upgrade cost from a Ryzen 5500 to have a 5500x3D, they should have released all AM4 x3D chips to all regions to let ppl make a choice, I won't be going AM5 7*** or 9*** so guess I am just gonna stay where I am for now until I am forced to upgrade or I don't get the performance I want in games or general computing, which isn't the case right now...
Posted on Reply
#93
RJARRRPCGP
The reported clocks are so low, it may literally get spanked by a Ryzen 7 3700X in some games, or not be much better!

The 3700X was the "sold-like-hotcakes" Ryzen during the very-early pandemic.
Posted on Reply
#94
Lew Zealand
RJARRRPCGPThe reported clocks are so low, it may literally get spanked by a Ryzen 7 3700X in some games, or not be much better!

The 3700X was the "sold-like-hotcakes" Ryzen during the very-early pandemic.
With the 5600X3D and 5700X3D being ~5% slower the 5800X3D and the 3700X being 20% slower, it's very unlikely the 5500X3D will be more than 10% behind. Putting it well ahead of the 3700X. Maybe the 5700X could be faster in a particular game or two but very doubtful for the 3700X.
Posted on Reply
#95
Marcus L
RJARRRPCGPThe reported clocks are so low, it may literally get spanked by a Ryzen 7 3700X in some games, or not be much better!

The 3700X was the "sold-like-hotcakes" Ryzen during the very-early pandemic.
That's never happening whatsoever, maybe an odd few titles, the same where 5800x3D extra cache doesn't help, on the whole it should and will spank a 3700x and even a 5600x otherwise what is the point? 5600x which spanks the 3700x in pretty much all games selling for £125, no one is going to pay more for less than that
Posted on Reply
#96
RJARRRPCGP
Marcus LThat's never happening whatsoever, maybe an odd few titles, the same where 5800x3D extra cache doesn't help, on the whole it should and will spank a 3700x and even a 5600x otherwise what is the point? 5600x which spanks the 3700x in pretty much all games selling for £125, no one is going to pay more for less than that
On top of that, I don't know if my X3D is getting the maximum potential or not. Is there really that thing where the XBox game bar is required? LOL.
It's possible that in Windows tasks, lots of users will think it's not better than Matisse!

Especially with the fact that Windows (especially Windows Update) can still be a drag on a Ryzen 9 5900X! Even though I don't know if that's related or not, but Windows Update sure can be slow, even on a 5900X! :mad: :banghead:

So don't expect it to be faster than a Matisse in standard Windows tasks!

The 3D cache better be doing its job!
Posted on Reply
#97
Unregistered
Marcus LThat's never happening whatsoever, maybe an odd few titles, the same where 5800x3D extra cache doesn't help, on the whole it should and will spank a 3700x and even a 5600x otherwise what is the point? 5600x which spanks the 3700x in pretty much all games selling for £125, no one is going to pay more for less than that
As someone who's had a 3700X, 5800X and 5800X3D, this tracks.
RJARRRPCGPThat sounds like 2012's Intel, LOL.
To be fair, if you told me back in 2012 that my 3770K would last 7+ years and that my next gaming CPU would be AMD...

Posted on Edit | Reply
#98
RJARRRPCGP
Double-ClickTo be fair, if you told me back in 2012 that my 3770K would last 7+ years and that my next gaming CPU would be AMD...

Especially during 2012, was when there were new chips that seemed to not be much of an upgrade! Considering Sandy Bridge from 2011!

At least Ivy Bridge didn't have known major reliability issues. No known degradation issues at stock.
Posted on Reply
#99
Unregistered
^ Yep the era of 10% IPC gains...got my 3770K on clearance for that very reason, then sold it years later for $125 :laugh:
Posted on Edit | Reply
#100
RJARRRPCGP
Double-Click^ Yep the era of 10% IPC...got my 3770K on clearance for that very reason, then sold it years later for $125 :laugh:
2012-2016 was known by me as the "CPU-malaise-era", but we weren't having catastrophic levels of CPU failures, except for FX-9590, mostly.

Yes, there was also that issue with Skylake, with the PCB bending, but that looks like nothing.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 07:41 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts