Thursday, January 2nd 2025

ASUS Upcoming ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM is a 27-inch 4K 240 Hz Gaming Monitor

ASUS has published the product page for its upcoming ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM gaming monitor, which will go head to head with the MSI MPG272URX on which will hit retail as the first 27-inch 4K 240 Hz display. The PG27UCDM sports a 26.5-inch panel using what ASUS refers to as 4th gen QD-OLED technology, which the company claims offer longer lifespan compared to previous generations of OLED panels. The panel sports typical OLED features such as a 0.03 ms response time, a peak brightness of 1,000 cd/m², 99 percent DCI-P3 colour space coverage and VESA DisplayHDR 400 True Black. The display also supports AMD FreeSync Premium Pro and NVIDIA G-Sync compatible, as well as a host of ASUS specific gaming features such as ELMB, GameFast Input Technology, Shadow Bost and a DisplayWidget.

Inputs consist of a DisplayPort 2.1 port with UHBR20 (80 Gbps) support, a USB Type-C with DP-Alt mode and USB PD up to 90 W and a pair of HDMI 2.1 ports. There's also a three port USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 Gbps) USB hub with what we presume is a USB Type-B input and a headphone jack. The reason for the presumed USB Type-B input, is that the specs claim KVM support and this would only be possible if there was a USB input of some kind, but this isn't mentioned in the tech specs. The stand is your typical higher-end model with tilt, swivel, pivot and height adjustment, as well as ASUS' Aura Sync lighting and a tripod mount at the top. ASUS claims a power consumption of around 80 Watts, although this doesn't include USB PD. A big plus is that ASUS will bundle a DisplayPort 2.1 DP80 cable in the box, something for example Sony decided not to include with their INZONE M9 II which launched in September last year. There's no word on pricing for the ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM, but expect it to be on the expensive side of US$1,000.
Sources: ASUS, via Videocardz
Add your own comment

33 Comments on ASUS Upcoming ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM is a 27-inch 4K 240 Hz Gaming Monitor

#26
Cheeseball
Not a Potato
MxPhenom 216Im just on the fence on next monitor. I know itll be OLED and 4k, but im leaning towards jumping up to 32, but if i do that, my 2nd monitor needs to be 32 also, so may just need to go all in then. Or just upgrade my main and stay 27. I dont like when multi monitor setups use different monitor sizes hah
Actually :D 100% scaling of 2160p on a 27" monitor seems to be OK (for me). I tried it with the Dough Spectrum One last year and you can have it a reasonable 2.5' to 3' away from your face without the pixels looking mashed together and such. Take this from a middle-aged guy with bad eyesight (heavy astigmatism on left eye, mostly near-sighted).
Posted on Reply
#27
Upgrayedd
Garruscosts more than the 32" MSI one we have but now it is inferior at 27" though
Higher pixel density makes it inferior?
Posted on Reply
#28
MxPhenom 216
ASIC Engineer
CheeseballActually :D 100% scaling of 2160p on a 27" monitor seems to be OK (for me). I tried it with the Dough Spectrum One last year and you can have it a reasonable 2.5' to 3' away from your face without the pixels looking mashed together and such. Take this from a middle-aged guy with bad eyesight (heavy astigmatism on left eye, mostly near-sighted).
Same here dude. I have astigmatism in left eye as well. I wear contacts with -6.50 power. Im basically blind lol
Posted on Reply
#29
Scircura
MxPhenom 216Are you running windows with any scaling? Seems like shit would be tiny
For many years I've run my 27" 4K monitor at 200% scaling, but I also position the screen beyond arm's length. Prompted by this discussion I'll try running 175% today...
Posted on Reply
#30
Veseleil
TannhäuserSince I'm about to buy the PG32UCDM, but it ‘only’ has DP1.4 so far (presumably an updated model coming soon?), I'm wondering what advantages DP2.1 should have with an RTX5090. Isn't HDMI2.1 completely sufficient?
HDMI 2.1 is sufficient only for transfering 120Hz at 2160p with 10bit colours. HDMI 2.1 tops at 48Gbps transfer speed.
Posted on Reply
#31
Scrizz
ScircuraFor many years I've run my 27" 4K monitor at 200% scaling, but I also position the screen beyond arm's length. Prompted by this discussion I'll try running 175% today...
When I get mine I'll probably run 150%.
Posted on Reply
#33
Garrus
UpgrayeddHigher pixel density makes it inferior?
do you really need me to explain the meaning of my sentence? can you not figure it out.... sigh...
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jan 6th, 2025 15:39 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts