Monday, January 27th 2025

AMD Teases Ryzen AI Max+ 395 "Strix Halo" APU 1080p Gaming Performance, Claims 68% Faster than RTX 4070M

AMD has just published its "How to Sell" Ryzen AI MAX series guide—several news outlets have pored over the "claimed" gaming performance charts contained within this two-page document. Team Red appears to be in a boastful mood—their 1080p benchmark results reveal compelling numbers, as produced by their flagship Zen 5 "Strix Halo" processor (baseline 55 W TDP). According to Team Red's marketing guidelines, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 APU: "competes with a GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile GPU at similar TDP and form factor." The first-party produced comparison points to their Radeon 8060S integrated graphics solution being up to 68% faster—in modern gaming environments at 1080p settings—than the competing Team Green dedicated laptop-oriented GPU, limited to 65 W TGP due to form factor restrictions. Overall, the AMD test unit does better by 23.2% on average (referring to Wccftech's calculations).

According to the document, AMD's reference system was lined up against an ASUS ROG Flow Z13 (2023) gaming laptop specced with an Intel Core i9-13900H processor, and a GeForce RTX 4070 mobile graphics card. The Ryzen AI Max+ 395's "massive iGPU" can unleash the full force of forty RDNA 3.5 compute units, paired with up to 96 GB of unified on-board memory (from a total pool of 128 GB). Non-gaming benchmarks place the flagship Team Red processor above Intel Core Ultra 9 288V and Apple M4 Pro (12-core) CPUs—as always, it is best to wait for verification from independent evaluators. Saying that, the "Strix Halo" APU family has generated a lot of excitement—even going back to early leaks—and the latest marketed performance could drum up further interest.
Sources: AMD Subreddit, uzzi38 Tweet, Wccftech, Tom's Hardware
Add your own comment

52 Comments on AMD Teases Ryzen AI Max+ 395 "Strix Halo" APU 1080p Gaming Performance, Claims 68% Faster than RTX 4070M

#51
mkppo
LittleBroWhy laptop? It'd do great in any SFF.
I SO want to tinker with this in a desktop form factor
JustBenchingIt will also be slower but you know, zombie buyers believe the marketing :roll:

I mean there is a reason they chose a tablet to compare it against. If im not mistaken a dekstop 4070 is ~50% faster than a mobile 4070. AMD claims their APU is 68% faster than the 4070m, which makes it faster than a desktop 4070. Aight
Desktop 4070 is in a different bracket altogether and is much faster. AMD were comparing it to mobile 4070, I don't think anyone was comparing it to the desktop version (unless I missed it and someone claimed it here)
Posted on Reply
#52
Sound_Card
Strix Halo is a mobile SoC, why are people trying to compare it to the desktop 4070? Is this confusion coming from the fact that Nvidia name the mobile and desktop 4070 the same? I give Nvidia credit, their confusing marketing at least works for their benefit.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jan 31st, 2025 05:09 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts