Friday, September 7th 2007

Volvo Showcases Rechargeable Hybrid Concept Car

Fortunately for the environment, it seems as though hybrid cars are starting to catch on. In anticipation of the Frankfurt Motor Show next week, Volvo recently posted some information on their new concept car, the ReCharge. Based on the C30 Hatchback, the ReCharge concept boasts a Lithium Polymer battery that can drive the car for 62 miles without help from the motor, and an all-wheel-drive system. A flex-fuel four cylinder engine can drive what the electric system can't. However, Volvo added something that most hybrid owners have been expecting since the first retail models went to market: a charge cord. If the battery is low in the ReCharge, a customer can plug it in, saving the gasoline otherwise required to recharge the battery. As of yet, there is no word on when we can see a non-concept version.
Source: EnGadget
Add your own comment

32 Comments on Volvo Showcases Rechargeable Hybrid Concept Car

#26
R_1
If we are talking for nowadays cars and technologies , then like it was said the best way is nuclear power + high capacity batteries. At some point in the future hydrogen will be operational for use.
Space traveling and achieving speed of light is another (future) kind of transportation. You know : to speed up a single 100 tonne spaceship to the speed of light won't be possible with fossil energy, even if we have to burn all of it in 100% efficacy for both process - extracting and storing.
Accelerating a 100 -ton payload to 90 percent of the speed of light requires an energy of at least 3000 billion tons of TNT.
Posted on Reply
#27
mdm-adph
kakazzaAnd wtf "just 400 more nuclear powerplants" how is that a good idea? >_>
...because it would completely free America from dependence on fossil fuels? Someone please tell me why that isn't a good idea.
Posted on Reply
#28
zekrahminator
McLovin
Cheyenne mountain can only hold so much radioactive waste...
Posted on Reply
#29
wazzledoozle
zekrahminatorCheyenne mountain can only hold so much radioactive waste...
There are plenty of mountains, and mountain ranges out there.

Burying radioactive waste below mountain ranges beats burning petroleum products and releasing their byproducts into the atmosphere that we breathe every day.
Posted on Reply
#30
kwchang007
Shoot the waste into space if you're really desperate for space....
Posted on Reply
#31
mdm-adph
zekrahminatorCheyenne mountain can only hold so much radioactive waste...
Ah, but mountain-based nuclear-waste storage will be irrelevant in about 100 years, once a viable space-dumping program has been created.
Posted on Reply
#32
R_1
ghost101So Iran is doing the world a favour by developing nuclear power?

Of course, whichever nation develops such reactors can easily make the weapons if necessary.
Don't be stupid. Nowadays uranium or plutonium nuclear weapon is a short range tactical weapon. The ones you should be really afraid of are H-bombs (thermonuclear bombs), thousand times more powerful than fission bombs with major component hydrogen isotope extracted from sea water. So you may start looking around for countries with seawater extracting facilities.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jan 22nd, 2025 04:42 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts