Friday, February 1st 2008
Apacer Launches 8GB DDR2-667MHz ECC Registered Server Memory
Apacer Technology has become the first memory module vendor to introduce a high-capacity 8GB DDR2-667 ECC Registered DIMM memory module for high-end servers and workstations. Apacer, which has already launched a 4GB DDR2-667 ECC Registered DIMM module, will be using this new ultra-high-capacity memory to meet the needs of the latest AMD Opteron based servers. Apacer's 8GB DDR2-667 ECC Registered DIMM is manufactured using advanced 70nm production process technology and carefully selected server-grade DDR SDRAM components, ensuring lower power consumption, high stability and superior electrical characteristics.
Model Name 8GB DDR2-667MHz ECC Registered DIMM
Capacity 8GB
Organization 256M X 4
Voltage 1.8V ± 0.1V
PIN 240 Pin
Cas Latency CL5
PCB Height 2.1''
RoHS Compliant Yes
Warranty Lifetime Warranty
Sources:
InfoMars.fr, XtremeSystems
Capacity 8GB
Organization 256M X 4
Voltage 1.8V ± 0.1V
PIN 240 Pin
Cas Latency CL5
PCB Height 2.1''
RoHS Compliant Yes
Warranty Lifetime Warranty
15 Comments on Apacer Launches 8GB DDR2-667MHz ECC Registered Server Memory
Though why aren't there FB variants? Are they planned?
In two year's from now I will have 2x4GB In my rig! :D:D:D
Whith 2TB SSD :D
And 8Core CPU
Oh yeah the world is rolling!
:rockout:
Seems they're already available.Doubt it, DDR2 is low powered, after all, while they won't exactly be overclocking them. And frankly, from the noise most servers emit rom the fans, I'd say that there will be enough fans to bring a little airflow over these.
They run at the standard 1.8v too, and CL5 means they're definately not going to be very stressed at 800MHz, so it should run cool.
Edit: I stand corrected (see above post).
I would say because of the small form factor of a 1U rack, the vast majority of servers would be in larger racks which could accommodate the module size.
6x4gb lol or it was 3x4gb not sure
well first 8 cored cpu is gona be beckton a xeon processor comming around q4 2009
Either way, I doubt server and workstations would be running the same exact versions of Vista as home users, so the limit doesn't apply there, or most likely won't.