Thursday, August 28th 2008
ATI Deliberately Retards Catalyst for FurMark
It is a known flaw that some models of the Radeon HD 4800 accelerators fail oZone3D FurMark, an OpenGL based graphics benchmark application that has found to stress Radeon HD 4800 series far enough to result in over-heating, artifacts or even driver crashes. The Catalyst 8.8 drivers have found to treat the FurMark executable differently based on its file-name. Expreview tested this hypothesis by benchmarking a reference design HD 4850 board using Catalyst 8.8 driver, with two runs of FurMark. In the first run, the test was cleared at a low score, much lower compared to those of whatever successful runs on older drivers could churn out. Suspecting that the driver could be using some sort of internal profile specific to the FurMark executable, Expreview renamed the furmark.exe file, thereby not letting the driver know it's FurMark that's being run. Voila! the margin of lead the renamed FurMark executable gave over "furmark.exe" shows the driver to behave differently. A shady thing since Radeon HD 4800 almost became infamous for failing at FurMark, and at least passing it with a low score seemed better than failing at it altogether.
Expreview caught this flaw when testing the PowerColor Radeon HD 4870 Professional Cooling System (PCS+) when odd behaviour with the newer driver was noted. Successive BIOS releases didn't fix the issue, in fact, it only got worse with erratic fan behaviour caused due to a "quick-fix" BIOS PowerColor issued (covered here).
Source:
Expreview
Expreview caught this flaw when testing the PowerColor Radeon HD 4870 Professional Cooling System (PCS+) when odd behaviour with the newer driver was noted. Successive BIOS releases didn't fix the issue, in fact, it only got worse with erratic fan behaviour caused due to a "quick-fix" BIOS PowerColor issued (covered here).
89 Comments on ATI Deliberately Retards Catalyst for FurMark
btw i can never get my 3870x2 to run at 70% usage never mind 100% usage even if i open 3 games at once im pushed to hit 70 at all so is this designed to run like this too to stop overheating ?? would also mean this cards not living up to its true potential.
No games do what furmark does, and if you don't OC to the max and/or use 3rd market cooling even 4850's are OK.
And even with furmark on a 4850 on 8.7 drivers you can clearly see glitches when your card is pushed too much and you can OC less or simply quit furmark.
I can OC to a level that creates glitches in furmark but NEVER shows any anomalies in any game I play, and when I don't overclock furmark doesn't cause glitches on my 4850.
www.tgdaily.com/content/view/39045/135/
ATI has a great 4800 series but with heat issues. I've dealt with these issues with Nvidia and ATI in the past. but at least I spent less today for 2 4850's than I did for one card in the past. Gaming couldn't be better. I am also looking into some aftermarket cooling for these cards.
The only problem is it is loud. At 100%, the fan is louder than hurricane Gustav...