Monday, September 8th 2008
Blu-ray has 5 Years Left says Samsung
After having won the battle for supremacy over HD DVD, Blu-ray is on its way to become the standard consumer video format. It is not just a format, it's an industry in itself which begins from HD content creation production houses to recording companies to the consumers who again, invest in necessary equipment such as high-definition displays, Blu-ray disc players, etc. An important name in this industry, Samsung, which makes high definition televisions and players has noted that the format has five years left to remain a premium content format.
In an interview to Pocket-lint, the director of consumer electronics at Samsung UK, Andy Griffins said "I think it [Blu-ray] has 5 years left, I certainly wouldn't give it 10". Griffins believes that 2008 is the year of the Blu-ray, where consumers embrace the format by purchasing necessary appliances. He added that Samsung is heavily back-ordered in regard to appliances at the moment.
Source:
Pocket-lint
In an interview to Pocket-lint, the director of consumer electronics at Samsung UK, Andy Griffins said "I think it [Blu-ray] has 5 years left, I certainly wouldn't give it 10". Griffins believes that 2008 is the year of the Blu-ray, where consumers embrace the format by purchasing necessary appliances. He added that Samsung is heavily back-ordered in regard to appliances at the moment.
54 Comments on Blu-ray has 5 Years Left says Samsung
we have downloads and dvds sometimes are big enuf
movies dont need blu ray size disks and blu ray dosnt add significant improvement over dvd to persuade me to buy a full new collection
i think that storage sector should or is starting to use high capacity memory and external hard drives
people believe they need it if they have a hd tv but they dont, also cheaper to et an upconvertor
5 years is short considering dvd was all the way back to 1996-97 then it got popular around 2000
I just got Good Will Hunting in HD, beyotch. WHAT NOT?!
Secondly, if you think upconverted DVDs look just as good as a BluRay, then you are in serious need of glasses, or you've never actually watched a BluRay on a decent TV.
And digital downloads, while better than DVD, pale in comparison to BluRay as well. My Good Will Hunting on BD not only looks better than a download, but likely sounds better too.
The current infrastructure in the US is not up to the task of heavy HD downloads as the primary way to get HD, not to mention the announcement that many ISPs made about considering to go to a pay per bandwidth scheme. Sorry, but downloadable HD just won't be going anywhere for a while.
I'm willing to bet there are many consumers out there that also prefer to have a physical copy of the movies they buy. I know I do. I trust an optical disc a hell of a lot more than I trust a hard drive to store my media on a permanent basis.
MilkyWay, you don't have to buy your entire collection again. I know this is hard for you to grasp, lord knows I have told it to you at least twice already, but Blu-Ray players can play DVD's too. Your entire DVD collection doesn't become useless the day you buy a Blu-Ray player. You can still watch them. I personally don't buy a single Blu-Ray movie that I already own on DVD, but every new movie purchase is on Blu-Ray.
i know that it is better quality but to me its not worth the price of getting a player and the extra money on the disks
£25 upconvertor or a £100-£200 blu ray player? add in the expense of the new movies
there is an imax theatre at the Glasgow science centre Superman on that shit was nice :pimp:
I just think blu-ray is fighting a losing battle because when most of the internet is switeched over to fiber-optics digitial distribution will be the way to go. Sadly this kind of scares me because I hate all the DRM issues out there right now.
is a flash drive really cheaper than a cd tho?
steam style movie downloading would be cool tho, but they have to let you transfer the movie to a hard drive so that you can take it to your friends or whatever
Take a DVD and Blu-ray disc of the same movie and compare it on a 54" LCD HDTV. Tell me it ain't worth it. Of course there's no real benefit for blu-ray over dvd when you're watching it on a 27" 4:3 tube.
Even with upscaling with the best DVD players, I notice a huge improvement with blu-ray. In fact, blu-ray spoils you and you end up thinking dvd's look worse than they really do.
BTW - I chose a random movie to compare prices with. List price for the ruins DVD: 35. List price for the ruins blu-ray: 40. Amazon has them for 22 and 20 respectively. 2 bucks for added clarity is definitely worth it to me, but then again, I have a sweet job.
In all honesty, I wouldn't have a Blu-Ray player if it wasn't for the fact that I bought a PS3. I wouldn't pay the outragous prices for a stand-alone blu-ray player.
Upconverting DVD is good enough for me, but certainly isn't close to blu-ray, the the players cost about half what they do now, I would consider them.
Sony can kiss my ass, the PS2 was the last good thing they made.
i dont have a 52inch tv lol but if i did id get sky HD and watch sky movies HD
the cheapest blu ray option is getting a ps3 or a blu ray drive for your pc, yet if you dont want a ps3 and blu ray on the pc is the worst option
infact monitors go to a higher res than tvs so blu ray would be good on a pc
sony ps2 was actually shit, sure i had one but looking back the only decent games where few and far God of War was good and a few multiformats so many random and crappy games like spyro and movie tie ins
DRM filled music died, the consumers don't want it. Yes there were some who did, I have some I bought, but overall the consuemr rejected it. Blu-ray is still being touted as the next big thing, but looking at video rental places DVD still outweighs Blu-Ray by a large margin, as well as at stores, etc....
Consumers don't want to move from something they have and are comfortable with, especially when they feel fear over new tech, it is cost prohibitive, they feel they can get equal value from HD cable and other sources.
So the quality is there, but Id like to see the players and discs fall in line sooner than 5 years.
For everyone comparing prices... please remember that in Europe there is still a BIG price differential between DVD and BR. Much more than "$5".
BR is great IMO - once you got the movie playing. But all that DRM, forced trailers, et al, gets on my nerves.
I actually have my butler rip most of my DVDs, selecting ENGLISH, NO SUBTITLES, and NO TRAILERS. That way I can just get on with the film. The WORST is kids movies/episodes. You only want the children to watch "one show" of 5 minutes... but you have to watch 10 minutes of blxxdy trailers.
I am :D
And the rips still aren't of the same quality. But they are still excellent.