Thursday, March 5th 2009
ATI Catalyst 9.4 to Lack Support for Many Older Cards
ATI wants to diminish the list of supported graphics cards in the next release of Catalyst. With the release of ATI Catalyst 9.4, the plan is to exclude support for Radeon 9500, 9600, 9800, X800, X1800, X1900 and other desktop video cards. Catalyst 9.4 will also lack support for the FireGL X1/X2/X3, V3000, V5000, V7000 and FireMV 2200, 2250 professional cards. Of course owners of these models will still be permitted to download older drivers and use them happily. The ATI Catalyst 9.4 is set to be released next month.
Source:
TechConnect Magazine
87 Comments on ATI Catalyst 9.4 to Lack Support for Many Older Cards
But seriously, did you really need a reason to "drive you away from future ATi purchases?" :laugh:
Other than the token ones, of course. ;)
- Better driver, with greater improvements.
- PhysX. I've been wanting trully better physics in games since 1996 (after DN3D). None delivered. Nvidia is trying.
- I've been a Stereo3D gamer almost since the beggining. I even tweaked Doom. Nvidia always delivered. But more now. Most people don't know but S3D in Nvidia is not new at all. Has always had the best stereo drivers.
- CUDA. Like it or not. Need it or not, Use it or not. CUDA just works and is getting much more support and love by Nvidia than Ati does with it's Stream solution. And I do use it where it's possible. Saves me hours of transcoding videos. Hours.
- Oriented at high-end gaming. Pushing the boundaries of what's enthusiast gaming, as opposed to AMD's mainstream orientation of late.
I think those are enough reasons to, but anyone can disagree, of course.
and thats just me, Solaris here was in those drivers before me getting physx up and operational, couldn't have done it without ya man :)
If anyone can add some extra device ID's to these drivers, is my man Solaris17.
Yep, I don't praise ATi and bash nVidia at every turn, so that must mean I hate ATi.
Of course your the biggest fanboy on the forums, for thinking the above is true...but hey...
1) Improved HD3/HD4 engine performance.
2) Decreased driver size.
3) Quicker interface.
4) Less bugs due to the need for extensive compatibility.
ATi has done a great job keeping up driver support for a long time now (much better than nVidia, mind you), and yet still manages a driver half the size of the competition. CCC has matured vastly since its inception, and I honestly can't help but feel that dropping support for older cards will, in the long run, improve performance and compatibility in more current generations. With the massive architectural shift that occurred with the R600, it's not surprising where the cutoff point will likely fall, and I imagine it has some very technical implications regarding what they can and can't do with these drivers on a software level.
Besides, with the price of HD3/HD4 cards these days, I can hardly see the point in hanging on to some of these older models. For now, maybe, but the drivers are already in good shape for those boards and the need to update, minimal. I think a lot of the issues people hanging onto old chips are facing with their drivers have links to their tendency to stick with their old OS install as well. I have very rarely seen cases of driver issues (at least as they pertain to backwards compatibility) which have gone unsolved by a clean install with the latest service pack.
But hey, I don't mean to criticize, as I very much see the reasoning behind sticking with these old boards, but the reality of the situation is that ATi probably spends countless programming hours ensuring that these old boards still work with the latest drivers, and for chips sold years back, it begins to soak up margin they never earned on the products in the first place. Long story short, support is expensive, and there are bills to pay at AMD.
I have just been talking with one of my X1900 owner friends, and I have mentioned this to him and he is too considering going Nvidia, even though he has always have Ati cards (3 in 10 years but). Not only because of this, but I can tell you it has been the deciding factor. Quoting him, translated of course: "If because of this, they make me upgrade sooner than I had planned, I'll go Nvidia no matter what. I just won't let this happen twice. They won't do me this twice. Not me."
And he really meant it. He is like that.
This month comes the first dx10 game (stormrise, not too convincing however), i wonder how the nv cards will perform.
What you like about nvidia is their software, because it is really good, but their hardware is not so good...
EDIT: On topic: In techreport this driver thing is better explained and they say that the cards will get Quarterly updates, so I'm more than happy with that (you can figure out how many computers would have I mod the drivers in otherwise, as a last resort). LOL. This cards might even get better/maturer drivers than the supported ones!!
You can argue that amd doesn't do that and its cheating but disregarding all that AMD could do it if they wanted to get more performance. What matters is what card is better in all aspects and not just technical ones.
I don't see why nvidia's hardware is not as good as ATI's. If it wasn't it would be evident in market share which shows nvidia as market leader and the performance leader atm.
I for one am glad AMD has stopped supporting old cards but dropping the entire x1000 series seems a bit much but this is all part of their plan to focus all thier effort in providing better hardware.