Monday, May 11th 2009

Pentium Dual Core E6300 Spotted

Intel continues to use the Pentium brand name for its series of downscaled Core 2 series processors between the Core 2 Duo and Celeron lines. Japanese website ASCII.jp spotted a new model under the series, the E6300, originally slated for end of May. A retail box was spotted at a ground store. The most peculiar part of the name is its model number "E6300", which that has been used by one of the earliest Core 2 Duo models. The Pentium E6300 however, is the faster chip. While the Core 2 Duo E6300 is clocked at 1.86 GHz, with 2 MB of L2 cache and 1066 MHz FSB, the Pentium E6300 is clocked at 2.80 GHz with the same FSB speed and L2 cache size.

The Pentium E6300 achieves its 2.80 GHz speed with a bus multiplier of 10.5 (x 266 MHz). It is based on the 45 nm Wolfdale-2M core. The model follows the Pentium E5400 (2.70 GHz, 13.5 x 200 MHz) and falls into the E6000 series for having the 1066 MHz FSB. So in essence, it falls between the E5000 series' use of the Wolfdale-2M core, and the E7000 series' use of the 1066 MHz FSB. ASCII.jp notes its price to be at ¥8,880 (around US $90).
Source: ASCII.jp
Add your own comment

30 Comments on Pentium Dual Core E6300 Spotted

#26
kaneda
Well, the neoseeker review shows the 9600 barely competing with the E4300 in games.
the old 6300 beats the 4300. so yeah unless you really need the multitasking its kinda one sided. though, my 6300 clocked at 2.8 which is a pretty good thing to compare to atm is great with multi tasking. ive never had a problem with it, and i multitask a shitload.
Posted on Reply
#27
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
Multi-Tasking is probably not the best term for BTA and I to use when describing where the 9600 would shine over one of the dual-core counterparts at $90. Where the 9600 would shine over something like the E6300 or X2 6000+ would be in applications that take advantage of 4 cores. Obviously, most games do not do this, most newer games take advantage of dual cores pretty nicely, but show little improvement with quad-cores.

What most consider multi-tasking is really something that single-core processors could handle without breaking much of a sweat. Surfing the net, while listening to music, while burning a DVD, and IMing someone is not multi-tasking that requires a quad-core, or even a dual core.
Posted on Reply
#28
kaneda
newtekie1Multi-Tasking is probably not the best term for BTA and I to use when describing where the 9600 would shine over one of the dual-core counterparts at $90. Where the 9600 would shine over something like the E6300 or X2 6000+ would be in applications that take advantage of 4 cores. Obviously, most games do not do this, most newer games take advantage of dual cores pretty nicely, but show little improvement with quad-cores.

What most consider multi-tasking is really something that single-core processors could handle without breaking much of a sweat. Surfing the net, while listening to music, while burning a DVD, and IMing someone is not multi-tasking that requires a quad-core, or even a dual core.
I use the adobe suite frequently, that stuff defeintly rapes resources and definitly defines multitasking.
Posted on Reply
#29
totalz
tiggerTetsuo :p

I got my lowly E6300 to 3.9ghz,I might grab myself on of these if they're cheap in the uk just to see how far i can push it.
don't bother, keep your old E6300...

The new one is not good in OC, cause I'm OCing it :banghead:
Posted on Reply
#30
Unregistered
I have a e6750 now ;)

I sold the e6300 with the wondeful p5b-dlx ages ago,i miss that combo,it was awesome.
Add your own comment
Jul 21st, 2024 01:22 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts