Monday, May 25th 2009
Intel Core i5 Lynnfield 2.66 GHz Tested
Intel's quad-core Core i5 2.66 GHz processor based on the Lynnfield core, was tested on an Intel reference-design P55 motherboard (DIBX_CRB) by forum members of XFastest. The processor accompanies 2.80 GHz and 2.93 GHz variants higher up in the series, and is expected to be priced at US $196.
The test bed was put through 3DMark Vantage (Performance and eXtreme settings), Cinebench R10, Queen, Photoworxx and AES tests of Everest. The GPU is of little relevance, as the CPU test 1 is what is to be looked at. At Queen, the setup with 4 cores and HyperThreading enabled, edged a dual-Xeon L5320 (8 cores) setup. It proved to be roughly 25% faster than Core 2 Extreme QX9650 at Photoworxx, and scored marginally higher than it AES. More pictures of the motherboard at the source.
Source:
XFastest
The test bed was put through 3DMark Vantage (Performance and eXtreme settings), Cinebench R10, Queen, Photoworxx and AES tests of Everest. The GPU is of little relevance, as the CPU test 1 is what is to be looked at. At Queen, the setup with 4 cores and HyperThreading enabled, edged a dual-Xeon L5320 (8 cores) setup. It proved to be roughly 25% faster than Core 2 Extreme QX9650 at Photoworxx, and scored marginally higher than it AES. More pictures of the motherboard at the source.
64 Comments on Intel Core i5 Lynnfield 2.66 GHz Tested
Also, processors are very light and volume goes by standardized container size. In either case, shipping a processor is well under a $1 from what the end user pays.
Tariffs are really the only thing that can explain it. That, or there's no competition down there in terms of retailers so the few retailers that are there are in cahoots extorting the market. :x
I'm waiting on these I5 chips too,i'll only be ditching my 6750 then.
Tasmania and New Zealand have got to have some of the worlds best natural resources in combination with prime weather conditions for high quality fabrication of anything.
Its not like we use Tassi for anything already . . .
---
I wouldnt mind seeing how 8 threads effects my overall day to day usage in an i5 rig. More so, i cant wait to see how this i5 runs with a GPU / ermm memory controller buzzzz.
Great!
But NOT worth upgrading from Core 2 Quad if you have a good one already; unless you can and want to significantly OC it.
eg. you OC your Core 2 Quad by 30%. Now you want to OC your i5 by 50% (+20%) and get another +20% from the better CPU = 40% upgrade. That makes sense... you can pull a HIGHER OC from the i5. However, if you are running stock, or going to pull the same OC, then for a 20% improvement, it aint worth the spend
For a new PC this is clearly the way to go. i5 has 90% of what i7 can give, so the options that make sense are i5 for cheap or Nehalem-EP for CRUNCH.
Seems should be some hefty competition...
with this being that same 200$ for the cpu lets hope the p55 motherboards have a top range at the 150$ marks and an average of 100-120$
Hmmm, looks like I may be jumping on the i5/i7 bandwagon sooner than I thought. :D
So compare prices to ~$290 in the US for the i920. And back to topic, I'm wondering how the i5 compares to the i7 clock for clock. Comparing it to Core 2 based CPUs while interesting is not enough info for me.
We just live in the most rip off country i can think of lol