Tuesday, July 7th 2009
Phenom II TWKR 42 Hits 7.00 GHz, New High for AMD
AMD's Phenom II TWKR 42 quad-core CPU was made with only one objective: to deliver record-setting CPUs to more professional overclockers than thought was possible. Having rolled out at least 100 units, AMD opened a door for several world-record attempts. Some of the most important ones took place at the SF3D OC Gathering in Finland. The new world record the group of overclockers put up was 7.00 GHz. The record was attempted on a DFI LANParty 790FXB-M3eH7 motherboard, and involved (from what the validation page shows) a bus speed of 250 MHz, and 28.0x bus multiplier. Its voltage remains a secret-sauce.
Other highlights include a run of 3DMark06 with the CPU clocked at 6.54 GHz, on a different bench. 3DMark06 tests the stability of this clock speed, as the test includes the CPU test score. The bench was aided by two ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 GPUs in CrossFireX mode. The same bench was used for a run of 3DMark05, with the CPU clocked at 6.67 GHz. This time however, the CPU test was not part of the score.
Sources:
XtremeSystems, PCGH
Other highlights include a run of 3DMark06 with the CPU clocked at 6.54 GHz, on a different bench. 3DMark06 tests the stability of this clock speed, as the test includes the CPU test score. The bench was aided by two ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 GPUs in CrossFireX mode. The same bench was used for a run of 3DMark05, with the CPU clocked at 6.67 GHz. This time however, the CPU test was not part of the score.
90 Comments on Phenom II TWKR 42 Hits 7.00 GHz, New High for AMD
This test would be like putting Chuck and the X-1 in a 8 mile long vacum tube to break the record- it would prove nothing unless it's done via "PRACTICAL" methods, So unles Hp will be shipping PC's with liquid helium What does this prove....Well I'll tell you, Nothing!
Give me the components of my choosing and a trip to the Dark side of the Moon and I guarantee I can hit 8ghz
And don't you think if Yeager could've flown his jet in a vacuum, he would've?
You are still completely missing the point.
But the point is still valid- they still have to run in the real world on their own, and not with the aid of outside influence-This test would be like putting drag cars on a fixed rail track inside a vacum tube, Drag cars still face wind resistance,friction and heat all in one contained unit
Dragcar = Extreme overclocking/doing a "run"/taking it to it's limits, no real world benefit other than entertainment.
Road car (for daily driving) = Normal end-user desktop processor. Real world.
Not very hard to understand really.
The components of this machine are not capable of achieving those results so they used outside influences to achieve them... That say's nothing....
When they can achieve these result's in a way that leads to home use.... I will be impressed....until then these results are maeningless
OT: And if "outside influences" are your complaint, what about running n2o on a car? That's an outside influence. Same with CO2 cooling an intercooler to make the air intake below ambient. There are many things that can be used in drag racing that "cheat" the effects of the environment on the car. It's no different than using liquid nitrogen/helium on a cpu.
new high my ass.
My point is, if you find it meaningless to your standards, that's fine, but don't come into a thread about these matters, and proclaim it's useless. You are better suited to keep the opinion to yourself, as these posts are clearly not aimed at the practical market.
Maybe with 8x SLI 295's and 32gb of ram...
but is that really considered doing it, that is my point
EDIT: it appears this is lost to me
A dog was the first earth creature to reach space,thus holding that record, this i guess is just as important as far as computer's go...
Don't get me wrong we needed to see it was possible before we sent a chimp etc... then followed by man.... So I guess if you look at like that....
It is not meaningless