AMD Ryzen 9 3900X, SMT on vs SMT off, vs Intel 9900K 99

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X, SMT on vs SMT off, vs Intel 9900K

Test Setup »

Introduction

AMD Logo

The AMD Ryzen 9 3900X is the most powerful mainstream-desktop processor you can buy right now, and our comprehensive review of the chip shows it blow the competition to smithereens when it comes to multi-threaded tasks that can scale across multiple cores. It also performs very close to Intel's offerings at gaming.

Although over the past decade games have grown to leverage multi-core processors better, they still don't need HEDT-like core counts. "Battlefield V," for instance, was coded to leverage up to 12 logical processors. "Metro Exodus" and "Assassin's Creed Odyssey" can scale across a few more cores. There still remain games that don't need too many cores and benefit simply from high CPU clock speeds or IPC. This is probably why Intel didn't bother giving most of its desktop processors HyperThreading. The 6-core/6-thread Core i5-9600K is still being marketed as a gamer's CPU.



The Ryzen 9 3900X, thanks to SMT, or simultaneous multi-threading, can give your machine 24 logical processors, or threads. Identical in concept to Intel's HyperThreading, SMT treats each physical CPU core as two logical processors, so its machinery can be more optimally utilized. In theory, though SMT or HTT adds to the processor's power draw, latencies can pose compatibility issues with certain older software, or software that isn't coded too well to use it.

Nearly all PC platforms designed for multi-core processors offer two important settings in their BIOS setup programs: the ability to disable SMT or HTT and the ability to disable cores within a multi-core processor. These two settings come in handy for compatibility or troubleshooting, especially if you're a software developer trying to optimize or test your code. For most people, the settings don't make much sense, and so motherboards by default enable SMT/HTT on processors that feature it.



With a physical CPU core count as high as 12, we wondered how disabling SMT impacts the performance of a Ryzen 9 3900X and whether the processor in any way benefits from its disabling for certain kinds of applications or games. When you disable SMT, you shave off half the number of logical processors your operating system's scheduler has to address. Every processor it dispatches work to is guaranteed to be a full physical core with its L1/L2 caches, and integer and FPU pipes are fully dedicated to that workload. In theory, this should benefit software that don't scale across too many logical processors. Each core's scheduler isn't juggling resources between two threads, and so latencies should also be down.



In this review, we test a Ryzen 9 3900X with SMT disabled, making it a 12-core/12-thread processor. The processor is put through our entire CPU test bench and a number of games. We explore whether the 3900X with SMT disabled can be a viable daily-use solution for high-end gaming PC builds in which the user is more focused on gaming and light productivity. We are testing two theories: the extent of performance loss in multi-threaded tests and performance gain (if any) in tests that aren't too parallelized.
Next Page »Test Setup
View as single page
Dec 21st, 2024 12:22 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts