Arctic Cooling Freezer 64 Pro Review 22

Arctic Cooling Freezer 64 Pro Review

Value & Conclusion »

Performance

Test System
CPU:AMD Athlon64 3000+ (S939; 512KB; Venice)
Motherboard:DFI LanParty NF4 Ultra-D, Bios 5.10-2 Fix
nForce4 Ultra
Memory:2x 512MB OCZ PC3500 Gold GX 2-2-2-5
Video Card:ATI X850 Pro PCI-E
Harddisk:Maxtor DiamondMax 160GB
Power Supply:HEC Power475
Software:Windows XP SP2, Catalyst 5.12


Motherboard on-board sensors are very inaccurate, that's why I placed a small Type K thermocouple at the edge of the IHS. The observed temperature differential between reported core temp and IHS temperature is about 7°C. Room temperature was kept at 20°C.

Idle means Windows sitting at the desktop for 30 minutes. Load is after 30 minutes of Prime95. The CPU was running at 1.50V.


While the idle temperatures are pretty close within each other, there is a measurable difference.


Under load the differences are bigger. The Freezer 64 Pro performs excellent here, especially if you look at the fan noise.


It seems that the vibration absorbing mounting does a great job. Arctic's cooler is among the quietest ever tested.

I tested with both Arctic's MX-1 (after settle in time) and Arctic Silver Lumière testing compound. The temperature difference is negligible.

In their Reviewer's Guide Arctic Cooling recommends installing the motherboard in an upright position, like in a tower case, for best heatpipe operation. I tested this and see only very small differences in temperature. If you are running the motherboard horizontally, there is nothing to be worried about.
Next Page »Value & Conclusion
View as single page
Dec 23rd, 2024 02:10 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts