As the many Atom based platforms only differ in chipset used - mostly Intel or NVIDIA ION, it will be interesting to see how the added AMD graphics card will change things. To gage the general performance, Futuremark PCMark was used as a comparison, while 3DMark is utilized to gage the very general graphical performance, to get an understanding about the usability of the Radeon Mobility HD 5430 in such a setting.
PCMark07
Futuremark PCMark 07 Full Bench |
---|
| ARCTIC MC001-BD | Foxconn NT-A3500 | Zotac ION F | Viako ML-55 E350 WiFi | Desktop PC Intel i7-930 |
---|
PCMark 07 Score | 984 | 1070 | 905 | 855 | 4198 |
---|
Lightweight score | 984 | 986 | 936 | 961 | 3906 |
---|
Productivity score | 549 | 699 | 576 | 684 | 3626 |
---|
Entertainment score | 1009 | 1029 | 827 | 764 | 4238 |
---|
Creativity score | 1328 | 1192 | 1247 | 1190 | 4352 |
---|
Computation score | 751 | 1037 | 638 | 961 | 4419 |
---|
System storage score | 1676 | 1357 | 1725 | 1468 | 4487 |
---|
Video playback | 22.86 fps | 19.91 fps | 22.8 fps | 11.11 fps | 22.93 fps |
---|
Video transcoding - downscaling | 717.22 kB/s | 1086.94 kB/s | 540.56 kB/s | 305.44 kB/s | 5735.49 kB/s |
---|
System storage - gaming | 4.13 MB/s | 3.24 MB/s | 4.21 MB/s | 3.48 MB/s | 15.32 MB/s |
---|
Graphics - DirectX 9 | 8.38 fps | 7.85 fps | 4.79 fps | 6.1 fps | 65.73 fps |
---|
Image manipulation | 2.52 Mpx/s | 2.66 Mpx/s | 2.13 Mpx/s | 2.39 Mpx/s | 9.16 Mpx/s |
---|
System storage - importing pictures | 5.68 MB/s | 4.42 MB/s | 6.3 MB/s | 5.08 MB/s | 19.71 MB/s |
---|
Web browsing | 2.58 pages/s | 3.38 pages/s | 2.14 pages/s | 2.94 pages/s | 15.35 pages/s |
---|
Data decrypting | 9.72 MB/s | 22.26 MB/s | 11.25 MB/s | 22.07 MB/s | 63.97 MB/s |
---|
System storage - Windows Defender | 1.42 MB/s | 1.19 MB/s | 1.59 MB/s | 1.35 MB/s | 5.4 MB/s |
---|
Web browsing with 3 tabs | 2.83 pages/s | 3.34 pages/s | 2.27 pages/s | 2.96 pages/s | 10.94 pages/s |
---|
System storage - adding music | 1.21 MB/s | 1.15 MB/s | 1.22 MB/s | 1.18 MB/s | 1.4 MB/s |
---|
Text editing | 1.65 operations/s | 2.92 operations/s | 1.95 operations/s | 2.41 operations/s | 10.7 operations/s |
---|
System storage - starting applications | 2.48 MB/s | 1.78 MB/s | 2.36 MB/s | 1.98 MB/s | 30.67 MB/s |
---|
Web browsing 1 | 2.04 pages/s | 2.19 pages/s | 1.67 pages/s | 1.86 pages/s | 10.23 pages/s |
---|
Web browsing 2 | 2.11 pages/s | 2.26 pages/s | 1.66 pages/s | 2.12 pages/s | 10.25 pages/s |
---|
Graphics - DirectX 10 - texture fill | 3.62 fps | 3.5 fps | 1.66 fps | 3.48 fps | 37.23 fps |
---|
Graphics - DirectX 10 - color fill | 0.64 fps | 0.41 fps | 0.32 fps | 0.3 fps | 6.84 fps |
---|
Graphics - DirectX 10 - POM | 1.96 fps | 2.41 fps | 1.58 fps | 2.36 fps | 36.58 fps |
---|
Graphics - DirectX 10 - GPU cloth | 5.26 fps | 4.02 fps | 4.65 fps | 3.1 fps | 35.57 fps |
---|
Graphics - DirectX 10 - GPU particles | 5.92 fps | 4.09 fps | 2.2 fps | 3.05 fps | 56.77 fps |
---|
Graphics - DirectX 10 - Perlin noise | 1.55 fps | 5.16 fps | 2.51 fps | 5.05 fps | 88.05 fps |
---|
Video transcoding - high quality | 176.78 kB/s | 192.71 kB/s | 145.46 kB/s | 180.66 kB/s | 1247.87 kB/s |
---|
System storage - video editing | 17.15 MB/s | 12.09 MB/s | 16.83 MB/s | 12.38 MB/s | 21.58 MB/s |
---|
System storage - Windows Media Center | 7.72 MB/s | 6.64 MB/s | 7.28 MB/s | 7.02 MB/s | 7.98 MB/s |
---|
3DMark06
Power Consumption
As this system does not offer a classical Atom or Fusion platform, the power draw at standby, idle, gaming and during movie playback was noted. The MC001-BD is on par with one would expect to see in an Atom based system, but due to the combination between the Intel Atom and AMD Radeon, the power requirements are a tad bit higher than those of a current Fusion offering.
CPU Utilization
The ARCTIC MC001-BD can easily play back 1080P movies without any trouble. CPU utilization is on par with other, similar Atom systems. This is expected, as the GPU takes care of most of the work.
Temperatures
Even though ARCTIC employs a completely passive solution the unit is always stable. The above are the absolute highest temperatures noted during use. As you can see the Radeon Mobility is quite hot when really pushed with Furmark for 20 minutes. Considering the fact, that the benchmark pushes the GPU beyond what any traditional 3D application would, so you can rest assured that the MC001-BD will always manage to keep going (and going and going...).