Ripple Measurements
In the following table you will find the ripple levels that we measured on the main rails of HX1050. According to ATX specification the limits are 120 mV (+12V) and 50 mV (5V & 3.3V).
Ripple Measurements |
---|
Test | 12 V | 5 V | 3.3 V | Pass/Fail |
20% Load | 7.4 mV | 7.6 mV | 6.8 mV | Pass |
40% Load | 11.2 mV | 9.2 mV | 8.2 mV | Pass |
50% Load | 13.6 mV | 9.6 mV | 8.8 mV | Pass |
60% Load | 16.4 mV | 10.8 mV | 9.4 mV | Pass |
80% Load | 23.2 mV | 12.8 mV | 11.6 mV | Pass |
100% Load | 32.4 mV | 14.8 mV | 14.2 mV | Pass |
Crossload 1 | 9.6 mV | 8.8 mV | 7.8 mV | Pass |
Crossload 2 | 31.2 mV | 15.8 mV | 12.8 mV | Pass |
Overall ripple/noise suppression on all rails is superb! Even at 100% load, ripple at +12V is almost a quarter of the limit and on the minor rails it is less than one third of the respective limit. It is clear that Corsair/CWT found the secret formula that eliminates ripple, even at above 1000W loads.
Ripple at Full Load
In the following oscilloscope screenshots you can see the AC ripple and noise that the main rails registered (+12V, 5V, 3.3V). The bigger the fluctuations on the oscilloscope's screen the bigger the ripple/noise. We set 0.01 V/Div (each vertical division/box equals to 0.01V) as standard but sometimes we are forced to use 0.02 V/Div, meaning that the fluctuations will look smaller but actually this wont be the case. For the first screenshot we used 0.02 V/Div, so actually the registered ripple is much bigger than it seems (compared to the other screenshots where 0.01 V/Div was used).
Ripple at Crossload 1
For the first screenshot we used again 0.02 V/Div. The order of images is +12V, 5V and 3.3V.
Ripple at Crossload 2
For the first screenshot we used again 0.02 V/Div. As above the order of images is +12V, 5V and 3.3V.