Truthfully, there isn't much that can be said about the X2 Mini that hasn't already been said about the X2 (see here for our review). In terms of internals, the X2 and X2 Mini are one and the same, which is why everything said about that in regard to the X2 likewise applies to the X2 Mini. Much like the name subtly suggests, the main difference is the size. The Mini has been scaled down uniformly by roughly 4%, which isn't much but enough to alter how the mouse feels in hand, and what hand sizes are most suited for it. Pulsar giving users additional size options is certainly welcome, and as a bonus the weight is also slightly lower at 54 g instead of 56 g.

Compared to my copy of the X2, some other differences can be noted as well, although these aren't necessarily tied to the Mini as an SKU, and may simply be a product of sample variance. Most importantly, the left main button is much more stable on my copy of the X2 Mini, leading to less movement under the finger when pressed and no rattle when shaking. While it would be silly to claim that the Mini is less prone to loose buttons based on a sample size of one, it at least serves to illustrate that copies without button issues do exist. Another product of variance on the Mini is CPI deviation, which is significantly lower than on the X2 and in fact nonexistent altogether. Once again, it is impossible to tell whether this is an attribute shared by all other copies of the X2 Mini.

Hence, just like the X2, the X2 Mini is hampered only by minor issues, provided one receives a unit without QC-related deficiencies. Given that the better buttons on my copy aren't necessarily representative of the expected button quality of the X2 Mini in general, there is no reason to rate the X2 Mini any differently than the X2. No doubt less of a bargain than its predecessors of the Xlite series, the X2 Mini nonetheless is a very good mouse well worthy of our Recommended award.

When looking at alternatives, there is no shortage. The Razer Viper V2 Pro weighs virtually the same while also having no holes, has great performance, lower click latency and optical main button switches, high button quality, but a resource-heavy software and a hefty price tag of $149.99. The Xtrfy M42 Wireless weighs more while having holes, has excellent performance, great buttons, and a swappable back cover, for $99.00. For $89.99, the Fnatic BOLT has similarly great performance, slightly higher weight and no holes, and good main buttons, but suffers from its poor software and lackluster side buttons. The $79.99 Glorious Model O- Wireless scores in the click latency, weight, buttons, and charging cable department, but wireless motion delay is below par, and the software is a resource hog. Lastly, the Fantech Helios XD3 V2 is the budget option for $59.95, with great performance, very good buttons, and a big battery, but much higher weight, a stiffer charging cable, and lackluster side buttons.