Monday, May 17th 2010
More GeForce GTX 465 Details Surface
More details have surfaced about NVIDIA's upcoming GPU which is on the low-end of the GeForce GTX 400 series, the GTX 465. Chinese website eNet.com.cn published some lesser known specifications about the GPUs, which pieced together with known details more or less completes the picture. The GTX 465 has not four, but five streaming multiprocessors (SMs) disabled from the GF100 core, yielding 352 CUDA cores (against the earlier known number of 384). With a 256-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface, the GPU has 32 out of 48 ROPs enabled, and makes use of 1 GB of memory.
Out of the few benchmarks the GTX 465 was put through, it scored 5488 points in the eXtreme preset of 3DMark Vantage, which is roughly 20% less than what a GTX 470 would manage. It is said to have outperformed the ATI Radeon HD 5870 in Far Cry 2, while was slower than Radeon HD 5830 in Crysis Warhead. The GeForce GTX 465 will be launched on the 3rd of June, at the Computex 2010 event.
Source:
Hexus.net
Out of the few benchmarks the GTX 465 was put through, it scored 5488 points in the eXtreme preset of 3DMark Vantage, which is roughly 20% less than what a GTX 470 would manage. It is said to have outperformed the ATI Radeon HD 5870 in Far Cry 2, while was slower than Radeon HD 5830 in Crysis Warhead. The GeForce GTX 465 will be launched on the 3rd of June, at the Computex 2010 event.
44 Comments on More GeForce GTX 465 Details Surface
Either way, it's gonna pull way more than 80w he was hoping for.
I think it'll be like the 5830 not the 5850.
150/160 watt peak for my guess on the consumption. Though i dont think disabling 5 SM will make it any where near to "GREEN".
Kinda wish that Fermi Derivatives would be lot more interesting in price/performance and
Watt/performance ratio.
The 465 do run at pretty much the same clocks as a 470, so my bet is that it will be closer to 199W :p
I couldn't care less what the power usage is when the card is pushed beyond what it will ever see in real world use, which is where that 230w number comes from I'm sure. The highest it will ever see in real world use is 171w, so that is what the card peaks at.
And yes, it is going to be way higher than the 80w he is hoping for.
The point stands, they are ineffecient....
465 uses more power than 5850 ?
470 uses more power than 5870, meaning its not really good at all.
480 uses more power than two 5850.
sooo... Fermi(100) isnt going to be anything good before the refresh is out.
By then ati have come with a new lineup with die scrink.
Nvidia may survive with the other DIE's like GF104( meaning no GF100)
Core i7 920 (stock), Windows 7 x64, 6 GB memory.
I'm still finding it funny that a mere 5 less in name equals a 20% performance drop though. Seems like some kid's going to buy it thinking it's "almost as good" as the 470 and get disappointed with the actual numbers.
we'll see though.
That's like, totally relevant because there are lots of popular games using that Dunia engine, like Far Cry 2, Avatar... erm.. and Far Cry 2!
And Far Cry 2 is a totally demanding game, it's totally important to get 200fps in Far Cry 2!
j/k
Maybe it OC's like no tomorrow?