Thursday, July 15th 2010

Intel Speeding Up Sandy Bridge Launch

At this year's Computex expo held in Taiwan, some of the most unexpected exhibits were socket LGA1155 motherboards from almost every motherboard vendor, including from lesser known brands, among market-heavyweights such as ASUS, Gigabyte, and MSI. Socket LGA1155 is expected to be the platform on which value-thru-performance processors from Intel, based on its next-generation Sandy Bridge architecture will run. The fact that motherboard vendors managed to show almost market-ready products as early as May, shows that these products could in fact reach market before next year's CES event, which is typically held in January.

That seems to be the case, according to a recent report by PC World. In the company's Q2 conference call, Intel CEO Paul Otellini said that due to rave reviews by industry customers (which likely include OEMs, hardware vendors, and other partners), Intel is speeding up launch of new processors. "I am more excited by Sandy Bridge than I have been in any product that the company has launched in a number of years," he said, adding "Due to the very strong reception of Sandy Bridge, we have accelerated our 32-nanometer factory ramp and have raised our capex guidance to enable us to meet the anticipated demand."

On Tuesday, Intel announced record earnings, calling its Q2 2010 performance "the best ever" for the company. The new processors based on the Sandy Bridge architecture will be built on the 32 nm manufacturing process, and use the new LGA1155 package, compatible with certain Intel 6-series chipsets.
Source: PC World
Add your own comment

30 Comments on Intel Speeding Up Sandy Bridge Launch

#26
HillBeast
newfellowNo way for current i7. the 920/930 sucks.
Dude, are you mad? The 920s and the 930s are like the best i7s because they offer almost identical performance to the best quad core 900 series i7s and they overclock like monsters. These things easily reach well over 4.5GHz and they are unbelieveably stable. They're in a totally different league to the QX9650. For starters the QX9650 only has dual channel RAM, the 930 has EDIT: Triple. The 9650 has 4 threads, the 930 has 8 (which logic would dictate because they are both 45nm, it would use 2x the power of the 9650, but somehow Intel managed to make it not). They aren't just better than the previous generation, they are a mile ahead of them.

Don't get me wrong, Core was a great architecture, but it's not that brilliant. Nehalem is far better and there is no reviewer out there who would contradict what I'm saying.

EDIT: Man I'm a knob. why did I say quad channel memory? It's triple and I know that because I have one.
Posted on Reply
#27
LAN_deRf_HA
HillBeast930 has quad
:wtf:.. well fudge, where's my last two ram slots?
Posted on Reply
#28
TheLaughingMan
Well then.....I am glad to see Sandy Bridge is coming out early. I am considering building a dedicated folding rig now and I hold this will usher a price drop for the i7 920, even if it is just a little bit.
Posted on Reply
#29
Wile E
Power User
HillBeastDude, are you mad? The 920s and the 930s are like the best i7s because they offer almost identical performance to the best quad core 900 series i7s and they overclock like monsters. These things easily reach well over 4.5GHz and they are unbelieveably stable. They're in a totally different league to the QX9650. For starters the QX9650 only has dual channel RAM, the 930 has quad. The 9650 has 4 threads, the 930 has 8 (which logic would dictate because they are both 45nm, it would use 2x the power of the 9650, but somehow Intel managed to make it not). They aren't just better than the previous generation, they are a mile ahead of them.

Don't get me wrong, Core was a great architecture, but it's not that brilliant. Nehalem is far better and there is no reviewer out there who would contradict what I'm saying.
It's triple, not quad. Just a fyi.
Posted on Reply
#30
HillBeast
LAN_deRf_HA:wtf:.. well fudge, where's my last two ram slots?
Wile EIt's triple, not quad. Just a fyi.
Yeah I was half asleep while typing. My mistake. I know it's triple, it was a typo. I must have been thinking about quad cores...
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 28th, 2024 02:59 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts