Wednesday, August 11th 2010

Intel 2011 Core Series Desktop Processor Roadmap Surfaces

Having turned its most profitable quarter, Intel is banking on its vast lineup of the 2010 Core processors, which will be updated towards the end of the year. By 2011, Intel will have a new series of second generation Core i7, Core i5, and Core i3 processors, based on a brand new architecture, and built for new sockets and chipsets. A roadmap of the same reached sections of the European media, which shows the company to be almost ready with a full-fledged lineup of desktop processors covering most price-points, by 2011.

The new architecture on which these processors are based is referred to by Intel as "Sandy Bridge", key features of which include the inclusion of the new Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX), a more advanced instruction set than SSE, to accelerate complex applications. AVX aside, there's Turbo Boost technology 2.0 that comes with even smarter algorithms to automatically manage clock speeds of individual processor cores to maximize performance within the processor's TDP envelope, AES-NI, which is a more manageable hardware data encryption instruction set, and processors with integrated graphics (IGP) controllers will have even faster ones, because Intel will be relocating the IGP and memory controller to the same die as the processor cores, this IGP is referred to as Intel "GT2" graphics.

Package and Platform
The new processors in Intel's lineup are built on the new 1,155-pin LGA package (LGA1155), and almost every motherboard manufacturer has already displayed consumer motherboards based on the upcoming Intel P67 "Cougar Point" chipset, at this year's Computex event held in Taipei.

Nomenclature and Positioning
Intel's 2011 lineup of Core processors will use the same brand identifiers as the 2010 series: Core i7 delivers all the features and quantitative performance available to the generation, Core i5 delivers "smart performance" by balancing "smart" features (such as Turbo Boost 2.0) to manage performance and energy-efficiency, with mid-thru-high levels of quantitative performance, while Core i3 delivers the essentials, and captures the value segment.

While the 2010 series three-digit processor model numbers starting with 5xx for Core i3 dual-core, 6xx for Core i5 dual-core, 7xx for Core i5 quad-core, 8xx for Core i7 LGA1156 quad-core, and 9xx for Core i7 LGA1366 quad-core and six-core processors, the 2010 series will use a four-digit processor number scheme:
  • 21xx - Core i3 dual-core
  • 23xx - Core i5 dual-core
  • 24xx - Core i5 quad-core
  • 25xx - Core i5 quad-core
  • 27xx - Core i7 quad-core
Among these, there are a few number suffixes that denote some special features:
  • K - Overclockers' favourite, has unlocked BClk multipler
  • S - Energy efficient, quad-core S chips have TDP of 65W against 95W, while having comparable clock speeds
  • T - Low-power, have relatively lower clock-speeds, quad-core chips have TDP of 35W
  • M - Mobile processors
  • QM - Quad-core mobile
  • XM - Extreme Performance mobile
Principal Features
There are essentially three kinds of dies Intel engineered, and carved out a horde of SKUs. A dual-core die that has a truly integrated memory controller (compared to present Core i3/i5 dual-core chips where IMC isn't on the same die as the processor cores), an IGP, and 3 MB of L3 cache; a quad-core die with integrated memory controller and 6 MB of L3 cache; and a high-end quad-core die with integrated memory controller and 8 MB of L3 cache.

Models
As given in the table below. At this point we're not entirely sure what differentiates Core i5 24xx from Core i5 25xx, frequencies don't seem to be it. Perhaps there's an instruction set or a feature that's enabled on the 25xx.

Availability
There has got to be a reason why every motherboard maker had an LGA1155 motherboard ready for display as early as in June 2010, especially 7 months ahead of CES 2011 (it's typically held in early January), and the only possibility that makes sense is that Intel could start releasing these processors very early in 2011, or even towards the end of 2010. As far as pricing goes, one can expect them to be on par with 2010 Core processors.
Source: Computerbase.de
Add your own comment

35 Comments on Intel 2011 Core Series Desktop Processor Roadmap Surfaces

#26
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
CDdude55Ya i saw the 970, it's supposedly been priced at $500 here in the U.S. and that's way to much for me.:((guess I'll wait till it gets cheaper)
$500? Try $850 in 1000 unit quantities...:shadedshu
OctopussI wonder if it's possible to have a CPU with both unlocked bclk AND lower TDP :D

I know I will be upgrading, still using my P45-based PC with E8400. This will rock for me. I'm happy I didn't buy a new AMD stuff (was in fact because of lack of 32nm CPUs).
Well the lower TDP processors seem to get that lower TDP from lowering the clock speed(and likely the stock voltage to match those clock speeds), so if you want an unlocked BCLK Multiplier, and a lower TDP, just buy the K edition and underclock/undervolt it...though that would make the unlocked BCLK Multiplier kind of useless...
Posted on Reply
#27
brandonwh64
Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!
So are they phasing out 1366 and 1156?
Posted on Reply
#28
CDdude55
Crazy 4 TPU!!!
newtekie1$500? Try $850 in 1000 unit quantities...:shadedshu
Ah damn, that's way to much for me.:(
Posted on Reply
#29
overclocking101
i saw no where where sandy bridge crushes bulldozer on that link. its all news we already have posted on here just all in one spot copy and pasted. but i saw no comparative SB vs BD just sandy bridge stuff
Posted on Reply
#31
Octopuss
CDdude55That site looks fake as $hit. Looks like some random guys blog.(which i think it is)
Also the awesome typing skills!
Posted on Reply
#32
Hayder_Master
i never expect good deals from unlock INTEL possessors anymore
Posted on Reply
#33
cheezburger
  • 21xx - Core i3 dual-core
  • 23xx - Core i5 dual-core
  • 24xx - Core i5 quad-core
  • 25xx - Core i5 quad-core
  • 27xx - Core i7 quad-core
hmm...it seems like they are copy their naming from amd's radeon line..
Posted on Reply
#34
CDdude55
Crazy 4 TPU!!!
cheezburgerhmm...it seems like they are copy their naming from amd's radeon line..
:confused::confused: how?... because they're four digits?
Posted on Reply
#35
cheezburger
CDdude55:confused::confused: how?... because they're four digits?
don't you find any coincident here?

21xx~23xx entry level

24xx~25xx mainstream

27xx ~ up high end
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 10th, 2025 18:02 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts