Wednesday, September 7th 2011
AMD Delays FX Series Launch to October, Expands First Wave
Even as there are rumors that the launch of Opteron processors based on the Bulldozer architecture is imminent, there is news that AMD has rescheduled the launch of its FX series performance desktop processors to October 2011, sources told X-bit Labs. The reasons for the delay are known, but when the processors do come out, AMD wants to make sure that they target as many performance price-points as possible, and so the first wave of FX processors will include 7 models, that's four 8-core FX-8000 series chips, one 6-core FX-6000 series chip, and two 4-core FX-4000 series chips.
The first wave is going to include the 3.60 GHz FX-8150, the 3.10 GHz FX-8120 that will be available in 95W and 125W variants, and 2.80 GHz FX-8100 eight-core models; 3.30 GHz FX-6100 six-core model; 4.20 GHz FX-4170 and 3.60 GHz FX-4100 quad-core chips. As you can see, AMD does seem to have tweaked the clock speeds of some of the models compared to older clock speed tables by other sources. The next wave of FX series processors is slated for Q1 2012, which includes faster models across the three lines. According to data compiled by X-bit Labs, the FX series can now be tabulated as shown below.
Source:
X-bit Labs
The first wave is going to include the 3.60 GHz FX-8150, the 3.10 GHz FX-8120 that will be available in 95W and 125W variants, and 2.80 GHz FX-8100 eight-core models; 3.30 GHz FX-6100 six-core model; 4.20 GHz FX-4170 and 3.60 GHz FX-4100 quad-core chips. As you can see, AMD does seem to have tweaked the clock speeds of some of the models compared to older clock speed tables by other sources. The next wave of FX series processors is slated for Q1 2012, which includes faster models across the three lines. According to data compiled by X-bit Labs, the FX series can now be tabulated as shown below.
153 Comments on AMD Delays FX Series Launch to October, Expands First Wave
But then again I'm broke so a wait isn't so bad for me :p
You should change "sources" to "unofficial sources" in your article.
This is nothing more than combining several rumors out there into this chart and guesstimating on a release date. Really does its job to drive traffic to that site :shadedshu
I am pissed because I don't usually buy the newest tech out, but had the funds this time so have gone all out ready for BD.... aaarrrggh!!!
Oh well, my ranting isn't going to change anything.
Just release it already.. or at least send me an ES!! :)
*grunt*
sites.amd.com/us/promo/processors/Pages/operation-scorpius.aspx/
This is getting silly. What happened to desktops first, servers second? You know, I bet the community would be much more understanding if AMD manned up and just explained why all these delays are necessary...
I knew it...... Shame on you AMD.....
Sitting here and waiting with latest HW to be installed .... grrrrrrrrrr
I think AMD needs to adapt a Tick-Tock methology too. They keep getting stuck like Intel did with Pentium 4 and it's bad for business.
As far as i can tell the highest retail clock speed i have seen is 3.8ghz (although i could be wrong :laugh:) but to the average buyer i assume they would see the higher number of those ghz things as better but also those in charge of marketing i'm sure the clock speed could/would be very useful for marketing spin.
But i have to wonder assuming this is accurate what this delay is about, as it's so short could it just be extra time so that more chips can get off the line and in to stocks ensuring higher levels available on launch day?
vr-zone.com/articles/amd-ships-first-interlagos-cpus-based-on-bulldozer/13503.html
If all these delays mean we get a good working chip I'm all for the delays, god help AMD if serious bug is found after launch though :slap: